Case law

Mandel v. Myers

29 Cal. 3d 531 · California Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1981

This court’s decision in State Board of Education v. Levit (1959) 52 Cal.2d 441 [ 343 P.2d 8 ] illustrates the point. … (See, e.g., Newland v. Board of Governors (1-977) 19 Cal.3d 705, 711-713 [ 139 Cal.Rptr. 620 , 566 P.2d 254 ].)

Loeb v. Christie

6 Cal. 2d 416 · California Supreme Court · May 21, 1936

Assn. v. … Since the filing of appellant’s briefs in this cause we have handed down our decision in the case of Brown v. Ferdon, 5 Cal. (2d) 226 [ 54 Pac. (2d) 712 ], and companion cases.

McDonald v. Mezes

107 Cal. 492 · California Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1895

Appellant relies on Brown v. … This view is within the principle of Ede v. Knight, 93 Cal. 165 , and Parker v. Reay, 76 Cal. 103 .

Conley v. Price

1 Cal. Unrep. 356 · California Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1867

The case is apparently within the rule laid down in People v. Gray, 23 Cal. 126 . On the authority of that case the complaint is considered by us to be insufficient. … We further hold the petition to be defective, for the reason that neither of the auditor’s warrants “specifies the liability for which it was drawn,” as required by the act creating a board of supervisors, in the counties

In Re Marvich

27 Cal. 2d 503 · California Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1946

(People v. Marvich, 44 Cal.App.2d 858 [ 113 P.2d 223 ].) … (People v. McNabb, 3 Cal.2d 441 [ 45 P.2d 334 ].)

De Long v. Warren

4 Cal. Unrep. 677 · California Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1894

in a good and workmanlike manner and not otherwise; and that the damage to the property of plaintiff, if any, is by reason of the lot of the plaintiff being below the official grade of said street as established by the board … Co. v. Chicago, 99 U. S. 635 , 25 L. Ed. 336 . Under the clause of the present constitution above quoted the rule is reversed, and in Reardon v. City and County of San Francisco, 66 Cal. 492 , 56 Am.

Bonds v. Roy

83 Cal. Rptr. 2d 289 · California Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1999

Opinion BROWN, J. … (See Province v.

White v. Superior Court

110 Cal. 60 · California Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1895

Co. v. Placer County, 43 Cal. 365 ; People v. Board of Delegates, 14 Cal. 479 ; Buckley v. Superior Court, 96 Cal. 119 ; Loaiza v. Superior Court, 85 Cal. 11, 35 ; 20 Am. St. Rep. 197 .) … Bank v. Board of Equalization, 97 Cal. 317 ; Buckley v. Superior Court, supra.)

Wilson v. Shackelford

41 Cal. 630 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1871

took the key with him; that in the ensuing month of January, daring the plaintiff’s absence, the defendants entered the new house and have ever since occupied it; that they obtained access to it by removing some of the boards … This precise question was before the Court in Shelby v. Houston, 38 Cal. 410 , and was decided adversely to the construction now contended for.

Cleary v. Folger

4 Cal. Unrep. 76 · California Supreme Court · Aug 10, 1893

Rep. 257 , 25 Pac. 749 ; Newton v. Hull, 90 Cal. 487 , 27 Pac. 429 : Phelps v. Brown, 95 Cal. 572 , 30 Pac. 774 . … Campbell, 47 Cal. 542 , and Parnell v. Hahn, 61 Cal. 131 .

People v. Monstad

209 Cal. 658 · California Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1930

Co. v. Kimball, 114 Cal. 414 [ 46 Pac. 275 ]. … Co. v. Hamilton, 161 Cal. 610 *663 [37 L. R A. (N.

City of Pasadena v. Stimson

91 Cal. 238 · California Supreme Court · Sep 16, 1891

Neither is the vaccination case (Abeel v. Clark, 84 Cal. 226) opposed to our views. … In Earle v. Board of Education, 55 Cal. 489 , and in Miller v.

People v. Hardy

2 Cal. 4th 86 · California Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1992

(People v. Brown, supra, 40 Cal.3d at p. 544, fn. 17 ; [citation].) … (People v. Brown, supra, 46 Cal.3d at pp. 446-449.)

City of Monterey v. Jacks

139 Cal. 542 · California Supreme Court · Jul 11, 1903

In this same line are the cases, San Francisco v. Beideman, 17 Cal. 462 ; Gordon v. City of San Diego, 101 Cal. 522 , 1 and Oakland v. … Proc., see. 1963, subd. 14; Nalle v. City of Austin, 23 Tex. Civ. App. 595 ; Gordon v.

Hocharian v. Superior Court

28 Cal. 3d 714 · California Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1981

Rules of Court, rule 203.5; Sanborn v. Chronicle Pub. Co. (1976) 18 Cal.3d 406 , 418-419 [ 134 Cal.Rptr. 402 , 556 P.2d 764 ]; Denham v. … Superior Court (1970) 2 Cal.3d 557 , 564 [ 86 Cal.Rptr. 65 , 468 P.2d 193 ]; Corlett v. Gordon (1980) 106 Cal.App.3d 1005 , 1013 et seq. [ 165 Cal.Rptr. 524 ]; Brown v. Pacific Tel. Tel.

Newport Wharf & Lumber Co. v. Drew

141 Cal. 103 · California Supreme Court · Nov 25, 1903

The other defendants are members of the board of trustees of the asylum. … The principle controlling this case is stated by the supreme court of the United States in United States v. Denver, 106 U.

Tinn v. U.S. District Attorney

148 Cal. 773 · California Supreme Court · Mar 14, 1906

This rule is supported, and judgments so obtained declared to be void, by the following authorities: Spoors v. Coen, 44 Ohio St. 497 , [ 9 N. E. 132 ]; Jordan v. Brown, 71 Iowa, 421 , [ 32 N. W. 450 ]; Garretson v. … W. 786 ]; Dunlap v. Southerlin, 63 Tex. 38 ; Sheldon’s Lessee v. Newton, 3 Ohio St. 499 ; Munday v. Vail, 34 N. J. Law, 422; Beckett v. Cuenin, 15 Colo. 281 , [ 25 Pac. 167 , 22 Am. St. Rep. 399 ]; Young v.

Smith v. McPherson

176 Cal. 144 · California Supreme Court · Sep 17, 1917

(Noice v. Brown, 39 N. J. L. 133, [ 23 Am. Rep. 213 ]; Paddock v. Robinson, 63 Ill. 99 , [ 14 Am. Rep. 112 ].) Nor will this court in the slightest modify so salutary a principle. … App. 766 , [ 89 Pac. 441 ]; Felger v. Etzell, 75 Ind. 417 ; Dupont v. McAdow, 6 Mont. 226 , [ 9 Pac. 925 ]; Lauer v. Banning, 140 Iowa, 319 , [ 118 N.

F. A. Hihn Co. v. City of Santa Cruz

170 Cal. 436 · California Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1915

(People v. Morrill, 26 Cal. 336, 353 ; Teschemacher v. Thompson, 18 Cal. 21 , [ 79 Am. Dec. 151 ] ; Wright v. Seymour, 69 Cal. 125 [ 10 Pac. 323 ].) … (Hart v. Burnett, 15 Cal. 530 .)

West v. Crawford

80 Cal. 19 · California Supreme Court · Jul 22, 1889

(Steamboat Co. v. Seawell, 78 Me. 167 ; Oldtown and Lincoln R. R. Co. v. Veazie, 39 Me. 571 ; Atlantic Cotton Mills v. Abbott, 9 Cush. 423 ; Stoneham Branch R. R. Co. v. Gould, 2 Gray, 277 ; Hughes v. Antietam Mfg. … (Twin Creek and Turnpike Co. v. Lancaster, 79 Ky. 552 ; Christian College v. Hendley, 49 Cal. 347 ; George v. Harris, 4 N. H. 533; 17 Am. Dec. 446 ; Amherst Academy v. Cowls, 6 Pick. 427 ; 17 Am. Dec. 386 ; Funk v.