Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscal

10,000+ results

1.88s

  • Lorenz v. Board of Medical Examiners

    46 Cal. 2d 684 · California Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1956

    On April 9, 1953, a special investigator for the Board of Medical Examiners filed with the board an accusation against petitioner (Gov. … Brainard v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Homan v. Board of Dental Examiners

    202 Cal. 593 · California Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1927

    for its consideration, which this Board deems sufficient, . . . the said W. … The point that it was not shown that Rhyner was not a licensed dentist is answered by Anderson v. Board of Dental Examiners, 27 Cal.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Pettit v. State Board of Education

    10 Cal. 3d 29 · California Supreme Court · Sep 7, 1973

    (See Board of Trustees v. Metzger, 8 Cal.3d 206, 210 [ 104 Cal.Rptr. 452 , 501 P.2d 1172 ]; Governing Board v. Brennan, 18 Cal.App.3d 396, 402 [ 95 Cal. *36 Rptr. 712 ]; Comings v. … (See Board of Trustees v. Metzger (1972) 8 Cal.3d 206, 210 [ 104 Cal.Rptr. 452 , 501 P.2d 1172 ]; Nightingale v. State Personnel Board (1972) 7 Cal.3d 507, 512 [102.Cal.Rptr. 758, 498 P.2d 1006 ]; Monroe v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • State Land Settlement Board v. Henderson

    197 Cal. 470 · California Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1925

    (San Francisco v. McGovern, 28 Cal. App. 491 [ 152 Pac. 980 ].) … Co. v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Ballard v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

    3 Cal. 3d 832 · California Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1971

    (E.g., Smith v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., 71 Cal.2d 588, 592 [ 78 Cal.Rptr. 718 , 455 P.2d 822 ]; Granado v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., 69 Cal.2d 399, 401 [ 71 Cal.Rptr. 678 , 445 P.2d 294 ]; Zemke v. Workmen’s Comp. … The order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board is annulled, and the cause is remanded to that board for further proceedings consistent with the views expressed herein.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Cedillo v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

    5 Cal. 3d 450 · California Supreme Court · Aug 16, 1971

    (Granado v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., 69 Cal.2d 399, 405-406 [ 71 Cal.Rptr. 678 , 445 P.2d 294 ].) … In the light of the apportionment in the original stipulated award, this opinion, accepted by the board, warrants *457 apportionment of the new award under Zemke v. Workmen's Comp. App.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

    2 Cal. 3d 964 · California Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1970

    (See Miller v. Trinity Universal Ins. Co. (1964) 30 Cal.Comp.Cases 430; McGee v. American Motorists Ins. Co. (1943) 9 Cal.Comp.Cases 97; Douglas v. Industrial Acc. Com. (1941) 6 Cal.Comp.Cases 163.) 2. … A tort release is effective upon execution, but a compromise and release of workmen’s compensation liability is invalid until approved by the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board. (Lab. Code, § 5001; see Chavez v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Gamble v. Board of Osteopathic Examiners

    21 Cal. 2d 215 · California Supreme Court · Nov 2, 1942

    (In re Rust, 181 Cal. 73 [ 183 P. 548 ]; People v. Jordan, 172 Cal. 391 [ 156 P. 451 ]; People v. Ratledge, 172 Cal. 401 [ 156 P. 455 ]; Ex parte Gerino, 143 Cal. 412 [ 77 P. 166 , 66 L.R.A. 249 ]; People v. … Mills, 74 Cal.App. 353 [240 P. 296]; People v. Chong, 28 Cal.App. 121 [ 151 P. 553 ]; Bohannon v. Board of Medical Examiners, 24 Cal.App. 215 [ 140 P. 1089 ]; Crane v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Garcia v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

    6 Cal. 3d 687 · California Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1972

    in Roche v. … The decision of the appeals board is affirmed.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Keiser v. State Board of Control

    192 Cal. 129 · California Supreme Court · Sep 21, 1923

    that the same be audited, allowed, and approved by the said board of control, but that the said board of control rejected and disallowed his claim for the reason, as stated by it in a letter to this petitioner, “that it … That there is no merit in this contention may be seen by reference to the decision of this court in the matter of Railroad Com. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Amador v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

    35 Cal. 3d 671 · California Supreme Court · Mar 26, 1984

    She sought to compel the Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board (board) to vacate its ruling that she was ineligible for unemployment insurance benefits because she had been discharged for “misconduct.” (Unemp. Ins. … Portland Cement Co. v. Cal. Unemp. Ins. Appeals Board (1960) 178 Cal.App.2d 263, 272-273 [ 3 Cal.Rptr. 37 ].)

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Pearl v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

    109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 308 · California Supreme Court · Jul 19, 2001

    (Bowen v. Board of Retirement (1986) 42 Cal.3d 572, 578 [ 229 Cal.Rptr. 814 , 724 P.2d 500 ].) … (See, e.g., Board of Administration v. Ind. Acc.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Yoder v. Board of Supervisors

    208 Cal. 368 · California Supreme Court · Oct 8, 1929

    This is a proceeding to review an order of the Board of Supervisors of Riverside County, made under Statutes of 1913, page 785, as amended (Deering’s General Laws 1923, and Supp. 1925-1927, Act 9123), purporting to create … Johnson Corp. v. City of Los Angeles, 198 Cal. 308 [ 245 Pac. 164 ]; Ferry v. O'Brien, 188 Cal. 629 [ 206 Pac. 449 ]; Bay Rock Co. v. Bell, 133 Cal. 150 [ 65 Pac. 299 ]; 43 Cor.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Lindeleaf v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

    41 Cal. 3d 861 · California Supreme Court · May 29, 1986

    Norton Co. v. … V Finally, Lindeleaf challenges the Board’s imposition of a make-whole remedy. In J.R.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Hager v. Board of Supervisors

    50 Cal. 473 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1875

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kahn v. Board of Supervisors

    2 Cal. Unrep. 729 · California Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1886

    On the authority of Kahn v. Bauer, ante, p. 728 (No. 11,764, this day decided), motion denied, with leave to respondent to answer within ten days.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Truman v. Board of Supervisors

    110 Cal. 128 · California Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1895

    Assuming, but not deciding, that this court could control législative action of the board of supervisors, as prayed for in this proceeding, the writ must be denied, because under present statutory law the board of supervisors

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Trustees v. Reynolds

    49 Cal. 2d 120 · California Supreme Court · Sep 20, 1957

    California Laundry, 7 Cal.App.2d Supp. 757 [ 45 P.2d 833 ]; San Francisco v. McGovern, 28 Cal.App. 491 [ 152 P. 980 ]; State Land Settlement Board v. … Flint v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Corbett v. State Board of Control

    188 Cal. 289 · California Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1922

    attending upon the sessions of the last-named board. … (Gross v. Fowler, 21 Cal. 396; Pol. Code, sec. 16.)

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Evans v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

    39 Cal. 3d 398 · California Supreme Court · Aug 8, 1985

    V. … (See, e.g., Whitman v. Board of Supervisors (1979) 88 Cal.App.3d 397, 417-418 [ 151 Cal.Rptr. 866 ].)

    Cited 37 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.