Case law

Reis v. Graff

51 Cal. 86 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1875

.: The Board of Supervisors not having made an order for the publication of the notice of the award of the contract, all the proceedings, including the assessment, subsequent to the award, were void. (Donnelly v. … Tillman, 47 Cal 40; Donnelly v. Marks, Id. 187.)

Reese v. Mahoney

21 Cal. 305 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1863

It is also alleged in support of the motion, on the part of defendant, Dennis Mahoney, that the process in the case was served upon him in 1854, on board of a steamer, as he was about leaving for the Eastern States, and that … (Patterson v. Ely, 19 Cal. 35 .) But if the rule were otherwise, the stipulations would not have aided the motion.

County of Sonoma v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development Commission

40 Cal. 3d 361 · California Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1985

Thaxter v. … Control v.

Cal. Cas. Ind. Exch. v. Industrial Acc. Com.

21 Cal. 2d 751 · California Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1943

Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., supra.) See, also, Di Renzo v. … Co. v. Industrial Acc.

S. P. Growers Ass'n v. Rodriguez

17 Cal. 3d 719 · California Supreme Court · Aug 10, 1976

In Schweiger v. … Retaliatory Eviction in California: The Legislature Slums the Door and Boards Up the Windows (1972) 46 So.Cal.L.Rev. 118.)

People v. Stockton & Copperopolis R.R.

49 Cal. 414 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1874

The “tax list or assessment-roll,” provided for by section 20 of the Act (Stat. 1861, 424), and which must be certified by him and delivered to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, is the only record of his final judgment … (People v. White, 47 Cal. 617 ; People v. Sargent, 44 Id. 432; Williams v. Corcoran, 46 Id. 555.)

County of Riverside v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.

202 Cal. 233 · California Supreme Court · Sep 29, 1927

Under the authority of County of San Benito v. Wapple, 188 Cal. 423 [ 205 Pac. 673 ], this finding cannot stand. It was therein held that by the amendment of chapter IY of the Political Code, section 2322 et seq. … of health that the board of supervisors of the county or other governing body determine in advance which of the alternative systems or methods of procedure should be selected for the extermination of said animal pests.

In Re McDonald

187 Cal. 158 · California Supreme Court · Sep 30, 1921

In Stanwood v. … (State v. Hoboken, 44 N. J. L. 131; Ricketts v. Hyde Park, 85 Ill. 111 ; Brown’s Estate v. West Seattle, 43 Wash. 26 , [ 85 Pac. 854 ] ; Hinchman v. Barns, 21 Mich. 558 ; Greenlee v. Marks, 62 Ind. 420 ; Hart v.

Shatto v. Crocker

87 Cal. 629 · California Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1891

(Board of Education v. Keenan, 55 Cal. 647 .) Furthermore, it appears from the defendant’s own evidence that he prosecuted the case referred to, and that the plaintiff was acquitted. Judgment and order affirmed.

People v. Hillery

62 Cal. 2d 692 · California Supreme Court · May 3, 1965

The television set was playing loudly, the sewing machine light was on, an ironing board was set up and the iron was hot. … A narrow brown belt (People’s Exhibit 35) was also found in the weeds on Elder, near the gloves. By contrast with the latter, the belt was not wet. Mr.

People v. Kinsman

51 Cal. 92 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1875

By the Court: It is admitted that the resolution of intention was not published in such manner as to give jurisdiction to the Board of Supervisors. … The facts of this case bring it within Reis v. Graff, ante. Judgment and order denying a new trial affirmed.

Schroeder v. Schweizer Lloyd Transport Versicherungs Gesellschaft

60 Cal. 467 · California Supreme Court · May 26, 1882

Law, 276; Bold v. Pother am, 8 Q. B. 781; Winthrop v. Union Ins. Co., 2 Wash. C. C. 7 , 20.) … (Id. 179; See Plantamour v. Staples, 1 Term. Rep. 611; Note, S. C. 3 Dougl. 1; Schieffelin v. N. Y. Ins. Co. 9 Johns. 21 ; 1 Phill. Ins., 485-6 ; Treadwell v. Union Ins. Co., 6 Cowen, 270; Saltas v. Ocean Ins.

Estate of Akers

184 Cal. 514 · California Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1920

(Coates v. Sulau, 46 Kan. 341 , [ 26 Pac. 720 ]; State v. Lanier, 79 N, C. 622; Snow v. Grace, 29 Ark. 131 ; Holliday v. Cohen, 34 Ark. 707 ; Cline v. State, 51 Ark. 140 , [ 10 S. W. 225 ].) … (Norval v. Zinsmaster, 57 Neb. 158 , [ 73 Am. St. Rep. 50077 N. W. 373].)

In Re Porterfield

28 Cal. 2d 91 · California Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1946

(Ventura County Harbor Dist. v. Board of Supervisors (1930), 211 Cal. 271, 280 [ 295 P. 6 ].) … (National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §151 ; Hill v. Florida (1945), supra; cf. National L.R. Board v.

Cooper v. Estero Municipal Improvement District

70 Cal. 2d 645 · California Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1969

It appears to be plaintiff’s seventh attempt to state a cause of action on substantially similar grounds, three complaints and amendments having been filed in the companion case of Cooper v. Leslie Salt Co. … Most of the matters have either been discussed in the companion ease of Cooper v. Foster, et al. or do not constitute assertions of wrongful conduct.

Newman v. Barnet

165 Cal. 423 · California Supreme Court · May 16, 1913

(Rowley v. Howard, 23 Cal. 401 .) … Brown, 73 Cal. 3 , [ 2 Am. St. Rep. 772 , 14 Pac. 366 ], and History Co. v.

Carlisle v. Tulare County

5 Cal. Unrep. 701 · California Supreme Court · May 29, 1897

In Pritchett v. … In Prince v.

City of Beverly Hills v. City of Los Angeles

175 Cal. 311 · California Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1917

Co. v. Citizens’ St. R. R. Co., 166 U. S. 557 , [ 41 L. Ed. 1114 , 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 653]; Russell v. Sebastian, 233 U. S. 195 , [Ann. Cas. 1914C, 1282, 58 L. Ed. 912 , 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 517]; Grand Trunk Western R. … Co. v. South Bend, 227 U. S. 544 , [44 L. R. A. (N. S.) 405, 57 L. Ed. 633 , 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 303].)

Bories v. Union Building & Loan Ass'n

141 Cal. 79 · California Supreme Court · Nov 20, 1903

(People v. Union Building and Loan Assn., 127 Cal. 400 .) After said reversal, upon the petition of a stockholder, receivers were appointed. … (See Bories v. Union Building and Loan Assn., ante, p. 74, this day decided.) 1.

People v. Parvin

2 Cal. Unrep. 783 · California Supreme Court · Aug 23, 1887

Brown, 54 Tex. 342 ; Breen v. Railroad Co., 44 Tex. 305 ; State v. Ranson, 73 Mo. 86 ; In re Public Parks, 86 N. Y. 439 , 440; Larned v. Tiernan, 110 Ill. 177 ; Mills v. Charleton, 29 Wis. 410 , 9 Am. … So in State v.