Case law

Smith v. Board of Supervisors

99 Cal. 262 · California Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1893

, 1891, before the said board of supervisors, by approving or rejecting the claim. … The production of the certificate of the superintendent of construction before the board of supervisors was a necessary condition to the allowance of the claim.

Pearson v. State Social Welfare Board

54 Cal. 2d 184 · California Supreme Court · May 20, 1960

State Social Welfare Board (Nov. 1959), 175 Cal.App.2d 614 [ 346 P.2d 808 ], and two unreported superior court decisions, Putnam v. State Social Welfare Board (June 1958), San Diego County No. 223,084, and Trujillo v. … (Newbold v. Social Welfare Board,, supra, 76 Cal.App.2d 844, 847 .)

Camper v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

3 Cal. 4th 679 · California Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1992

Camper also argues that our recent decision in Poster v. Southern Cal. … (See Tielsch v.

Cumero v. Public Employment Relations Board

49 Cal. 3d 575 · California Supreme Court · Sep 7, 1989

To the *595 contrary, the constitutional limitations laid down in Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, supra, 431 U.S. 209 , and Ellis v. … Citing Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, supra, 431 U.S. 209, 239-240, fn. 40 [ 52 L.Ed.2d 261, 287, fn. 40 ], and Railway Clerks v.

Hinojosa v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

8 Cal. 3d 150 · California Supreme Court · Oct 18, 1972

The board rejected the argument of the referee that Smith v. Workmen's Comp. App. … Nor did the appeals board dispute this finding, but instead noted that “the referee in relying upon Smith v. Workmen's Comp. App.

Cartwright v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners

16 Cal. 3d 762 · California Supreme Court · Apr 28, 1976

(See Yakov v. Board of Medical Examiners, supra, 68 Cal.2d 67, 73 .) … (Lorenz v. Board of Medical Examiners, supra, 46 Cal.2d 684, 687 .)

Lundberg v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

69 Cal. 2d 436 · California Supreme Court · Oct 4, 1968

Code, § 5908.5; Evans v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., 68 Cal.2d 753, 755 [ 68 Cal.Rptr. 825 , 441 P.2d 633 ].) There is grave doubt that the board has complied with this requirement. … (Wilhelm v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., 255 Cal.App.2d 30, 32 [ 62 Cal.Rptr. 829 ].) The order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board is annulled. Traynor, C.

Andrews v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

28 Cal. 3d 781 · California Supreme Court · Jan 29, 1981

(Shakin v. Board of Medical Examiners (1967) 254 Cal.App.2d 102, 117 [ 62 Cal.Rptr. 274 , 23 A.L.R.3d 1398 ].) … (Labor Board v. Pittsburg S. S. Co. (1949) 337 U.S. 656, 659 [ 93 L.Ed.2d 1602, 1606 , 69 S.Ct. 1283 ]; see also International U., United Auto., A. & A. I. Wkrs. v. N. L. R. B.

Weiss v. State Board of Equalization

40 Cal. 2d 772 · California Supreme Court · Apr 28, 1953

(Covert v. State Board of Equalization, 29 Cal.2d 125 [ 173 P.2d 545 ]; Reynolds v. State Board of Equalization, 29 Cal.2d 137 [ 173 P.2d 551 , 174 P.2d 4 ]; Stoumen v. Reilly, 37 Cal.2d 713 [ 234 P.2d 969 ].) … (See Altadena Community Church v. State Board of Equalization, 109 Cal.App.2d 99 [ 240 P.2d 322 ]; State v. City of Racine, 220 Wis. 490 [ 264 N.W. 490 ]; Ex parte Velasco, (Tex.Civ.App.) 225 S.W. 2d 921 ; Harrison v.

Franchise Tax Board v. Superior Court

36 Cal. 2d 538 · California Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1950

(Coca-Cola Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 25 Cal.2d 918 [ 156 P.2d 1 ].) … State Board of Equalization, supra; Assigned Car Cases, 274 U.S. 564 [ 47 S.Ct. 727 , 71 L.Ed. 1204 ]; Buttfield v. Stranahan, 192 U.S. 470 [ 24 S.Ct. 349 , 48 L.Ed. 525 ] ; Brown v. Winter, 50 F.Supp. 804; Ray v.

Garzoli v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

2 Cal. 3d 502 · California Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1970

Schreifer v. Industrial Acc. Com., supra, 61 Cal.2d 289 .) However, the principles enunciated in Smith v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … (Pollio v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., 33 Cal. Comp. Cases 8 ; Vierregger v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., 32 Cal. Comp. Cases 351 ; Fox v. Industrial Acc. Com., 27 Cal. Comp. Cases 247 ; McIntyre v. Industrial Acc.

Jones v. Board of Police Commissioners

141 Cal. 96 · California Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1903

Proc., sec. 23; also, part III, secs. 1063 et seq.; People v. Board of Supervisors, 27 Cal. 655 .) In Barnes v. … The rule as laid down in the above case is the rule in other jurisdictions (People v. Supervisors of Westchester, 12 Barb. 446 ; People v. French, 12 Abb. N. C. 156 ; Georges Creek Coal etc. Co. v.

Adams v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

18 Cal. 3d 226 · California Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1976

Adams seeks review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board), following reconsid *228 eration, refusing to apply to medical-legal costs a 10 percent penalty against respondent carrier, Beaver Insurance … (See Ramsey v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. (1969) 2 Cal.App.3d 693, 697 [ 83 Cal.Rptr. 51 ]; Vogh v. Workmen’s Comp. App.

Mathews v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

6 Cal. 3d 719 · California Supreme Court · Feb 29, 1972

(Briglia v. … However, the Board has properly held that “[i]t is not necessary that there be a battery before one can be deemed a physical aggressor” (Rosenthal v.

Herrera v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

71 Cal. 2d 254 · California Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1969

Under section 4909 of the Labor Code, the allowance of credit for wage payments voluntarily made by an employer with no agreement as to their purpose is within the appeal board’s discretion. (See Mercury Aviation Co. v. … Evans v. Los Angeles Ry. Corp., 216 Cal. 495, 498 [ 14 P.2d 752 ].) Rather, as stated in State Comp. Ins. Fund v. Industrial Acc.

Greener v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

6 Cal. 4th 1028 · California Supreme Court · Dec 27, 1993

In Loustalot v. … Brown (1982) 32 Cal.3d 236 [ 186 Cal.Rptr. 30 , 651 P.2d 274 ]; Amador Valley Joint Union High Sch. Dist. v.

Mann v. Board of Medical Examiners

31 Cal. 2d 30 · California Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1947

Board of Medical Examiners, 74 Cal.App.2d 46 [ 168 P.2d 65 ]; Rich v. McClure, 78 Cal.App. 209, 213 [ 248 P. 275 ]; Benton v. Industrial Acc. Com., 74 Cal.App. 411, 415 [ 240 P. 1021 ]; Anderson v. … (Arwine v. Board of Med. Examiners, supra.)

Board of Osteopathic Examiners v. Riley

192 Cal. 158 · California Supreme Court · Sep 27, 1923

by necessary implication, by the adoption of the budget amendment to the constitution on November 7, 1922, this contention has been sufficiently answered by the decision of this court in the recent case of Railroad Com. v. … of Osteopathic Examiners in a special fund in the state treasury and that the claims of said board for salaries and expenses should be drawn upon said fund and be payable out of the same, the decision in Railroad Com. v.

Zeeb v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

67 Cal. 2d 496 · California Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1967

The petitioner and board in their briefs discuss only this issue. … (McCoy v. Industrial Acc. Com., supra, 64 Cal.2d 82, 89 .) The order is annulled, and the respondent board is directed to determine this controversy in accordance with the views herein expressed. Traynor, C.

Koehn v. State Board of Equalization

50 Cal. 2d 432 · California Supreme Court · Jun 4, 1958

(See Hidalgo v. … United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v.