Case law

Smith v. Board of Supervisors

99 Cal. 262 · California Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1893

, 1891, before the said board of supervisors, by approving or rejecting the claim. … The production of the certificate of the superintendent of construction before the board of supervisors was a necessary condition to the allowance of the claim.

Dryden v. Board of Pension Commissioners

6 Cal. 2d 575 · California Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1936

App. 26 [ 145 Pac. 736 ]; Brown v. Board of Police Commissioners, 2 Cal. … (Shannon v. City of Los Angeles, 205 Cal. 366 [ 270 Pac. 682 ]; Brown v. Board of Police Commissioners, supra.)

Speegle v. Board of Fire Underwriters

29 Cal. 2d 34 · California Supreme Court · Sep 20, 1946

(Brown v. National Electric Works, 168 Cal. 336 [ 143 P. 606 ] ; Davidson v. Laughlin, 138 Cal. 320 [ 71 P. 345 , 5 L.R.A.N.S. 579 ]; Millsap v. National Funding Corp., 57 Cal.App.2d 772 [ 135 P.2d 407 ] ; Seifert v. … Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341, 350-352 [ 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 ].

Board of Education v. Dresden Swan

41 Cal. 2d 546 · California Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1953

(Evard v. Board of Education, 64 Cal.App.2d 745, 751 [ 149 P.2d 413 ].) In Goldsmith v. … (Goldsmith v. Board of Education, supra, p. 169.)

LeVesque v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

1 Cal. 3d 627 · California Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1970

Martin v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board (1959) 52 Cal.2d 238, 246 [340 P.2d].) … Co. v. Industrial Acc.

DiGenova v. State Board of Education

57 Cal. 2d 167 · California Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1962

(DiGenova v. State Board of Education (1955) 45 Cal.2d 255 [ 288 P.2d 862 ].) Subsequently it was held in Fountain v. … State Board of Equalization, 11 Cal.2d 156, 167-168 [ 78 P.2d 731 , 117 A.L.R. 838 ] ; Bohn v. Bohn, 164 Cal. 532, 537-538 [ 129 P. 981 ] ; People v.

Reynolds v. State Board of Equalization

29 Cal. 2d 137 · California Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1946

Yellowley, 290 P. 849, 852-853 ; Klatt v. Guaranteed Bond Co., 213 Wis. 12 [ 250 N.W. 825, 830 ] ; Goldsmith v. Board of Education, 66 Cal.App. 157, 163-164 [ 225 P. 783 ].) … The case of Board of Trustees of Stanford University v.

Yakov v. Board of Medical Examiners

68 Cal. 2d 67 · California Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1968

See Cooper v. Board of Medical Examiners (1950) 35 Cal.2d 242 , 246 [ 217 P.2d 630 , 18 A.L.R.2d 593 ] ; Whitlow v. Board of Medical Examiners (1967) 248 Cal.App.2d 478, 483 [ 56 Cal.Rptr. 525 ] ; Morris v. … Contractors State License Board (1957) 151 Cal.App.2d 117, 120 [ 311 P.2d 51 ] (Contractors State License Board) ; Ashdown v.

Franklin v. State Board of Examiners

23 Cal. 173 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1863

In the case of Luther v. Borden (7 How. U. … (Martin v. Mott, 12 Wheat. 19 .)

Arp v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

19 Cal. 3d 395 · California Supreme Court · May 5, 1977

We review a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (board) which denied to Chris P. … (See also Kalina v. Railroad Retirement Board (6th Cir. 1976) 541 F.2d 1204 .)

Kerley v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

4 Cal. 3d 223 · California Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1971

Under virtually identical circumstances, an award was annulled and the appeals board directed to impose a 10 percent penalty. (Berry v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., supra, 276 Cal.App.2d 381 .) … Co. v. Industrial Acc.

Martin v. Board of Election Commissioners

126 Cal. 404 · California Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1899

In People v. … The county of San Francisco never has had such a board, or any board of supervisors since the consolidation act.

Meyer v. Board of Medical Examiners

34 Cal. 2d 62 · California Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1949

Hainline, 219 Cal. 532, 535 [ 28 P.2d 16 ]; People v. Barwick, 7 Cal.2d 696, 699 [ 62 P.2d 590 ]) or if it is offered for impeachment purposes in a subsequent prosecution (People v. … Code, § 309, nullifying the rule of Sherry v. Ingels, 34 Cal.App.2d 632, 635 [ 94 P.2d 77 ]; see Ellis v.

Adams v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

18 Cal. 3d 226 · California Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1976

Adams seeks review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board), following reconsid *228 eration, refusing to apply to medical-legal costs a 10 percent penalty against respondent carrier, Beaver Insurance … (See Ramsey v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. (1969) 2 Cal.App.3d 693, 697 [ 83 Cal.Rptr. 51 ]; Vogh v. Workmen’s Comp. App.

Honeywell v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

24 Cal. Rptr. 3d 179 · California Supreme Court · Feb 10, 2005

(Varela v. Board of Police Commissioners (1951) 107 Cal.App.2d 816, 822 [ 238 P.2d 62 ].) … J., Kennard, J., Baxter, J., Chin, J., Brown, J., and Moreno, J., concurred. 1 All further statutory references are to the Labor Code unless otherwise specified. 2 Section 3208.3, subdivision (h) provides: “No compensation

Fuentes v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

16 Cal. 3d 1 · California Supreme Court · Feb 2, 1976

Petitioner seeks review of an award by the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (the Board). … (Rees v. Layton, supra.) This is not such a case.

Laeng v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

6 Cal. 3d 771 · California Supreme Court · Mar 6, 1972

Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc. (1944) 322 U.S. 111, 124-129 [ 88 L.Ed. 1170, 1181-1183 , 64 S.Ct. 851 ]; B. P. Schulberg Prod. v. Cal. Emp. Com. (1944) 66 Cal.App.2d 831, 834-835 [ 153 P.2d 404 ]. … Exch. v. Ind. Acc. Com. (1945) 26 Cal.2d 130, 135 [ 156 P.2d 926 ]; Brown v. Ind. Acc. Com. (1917) 174 Cal. 457, 460 [ 163 P. 664 ]; Murray v. Industrial Acc. Com. (1932) 216 Cal. 340, 346 [ 14 P.2d 301 ]).

Rodgers v. Board of Public Works

208 Cal. 291 · California Supreme Court · Sep 27, 1929

of Public Works, certified plaintiff to said Board of Public Works for appointment to the permanent position of granite cutter, and thereafter said Board of Public Works appointed plaintiff to a permanent position of granite … , and on March 1, 1927, the defendant Civil Service Commission, in response to a requisition filed with it by the Board of Public Works, again certified plaintiff to said Board of Public Works and said Board re-employed plaintiff

DiGenova v. State Board of Education

45 Cal. 2d 255 · California Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1955

(Ratliff v. Lampton, 32 Cal.2d 226 [ 195 P.2d 792 , 10 A.L.B,.2d 826] ; Carroll v. California Horse Racing Board, supra, 16 Cal.2d 164 [ 105 P.2d 110 ] ; La Trade v. … Board of Civil Service Commrs., 26 Cal.2d 716 [ 160 P.2d 816 ] ; Bannerman v. Boyle, 160 Cal. 197 [ 116 P. 732 ] ; Welch v. Ware, 161 Cal. 641 [ 119 P. 1080 ] ; Knights of Ku Klux Klan, Inc. v.

Lamb v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

11 Cal. 3d 274 · California Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1974

(Lundberg v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., 69 Cal.2d 436 , 439 . . . .) This rule is binding upon the board and this court. (Id. at p. 439.)” (Garza v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … “As a general rule, the board ‘must accept as true the intended meaning of [evidence] both uncontradicted and unimpeached.’ (LeVesque v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., supra, 1 Cal.3d 627, 639 ; McAllister v. Workmen’s Comp.