Case law

Mitchell v. Board of Education

137 Cal. 372 · California Supreme Court · Sep 20, 1902

Amongst these cases may be cited Brown v. Board of Education, 103 Cal. 531 ; Earle v. Board of Education, 55 Cal. 489 ; Miller v. Board of Education, 44 Cal. 166 ; Kennedy v. Board of Education, 82 Cal. 483 ; Raisch v. … Board of Education, 81 Cal. 542 ; Stoutenborough v. Board of Education, 104 Cal. 664 . For the foregoing reasons the appeals are dismissed.

Board of Commissioners v. Younger

29 Cal. 172 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1865

(Marvin v. Bennett, 26 Wend. 169 ; 8 Paige, 312 .) … (Marvin v. Bennett, supra; Northrop v. Sumner, 27 Barb, 196 ; The Morris Canal Company v. Emmett, 9 Paige, 168 .)

Cohen v. Board of Supervisors

40 Cal. 3d 277 · California Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1985

(Sunset Amusement Co. v. Board of Police Commissioners (1972) 7 Cal.3d 64, 72 [ 101 Cal.Rptr. 768 , 496 P.2d 840 ].) … The board heard from three individuals regarding the proposed ordinance. Chief of Police Cornelius Murphy and Mayor Dianne Feinstein submitted letters to the board urging approval of the law.

Fry v. Board of Education

17 Cal. 2d 753 · California Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1941

“It must be conceded that, within the limits fixed by the School Code, the Board has discretionary control over the salaries of teachers. (Fidler v. Board of Trustees, 112 Cal. App. 296 [ 296 Pac. 912 ]; Abraham v. … A teacher employed but on leave of absence is, nevertheless, an employee of the Board. (Fairchild v. Board of Education, 107 Cal. 92 [ 40 Pac. 26 ]; Kennedy v. Board of Education, 82 Cal. 483 [ 22 Pac. 1042 ].)

Beals v. Board of Supervisors

28 Cal. 449 · California Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1865

He therefore seeks, by a mandate from the District Court, to compel the Board of Supervisors to levy, and cause to be collected, a tax, to create a fund sufficient to pay the balance still due. … The Board of Supervisors appeal, and the question is whether the warrant bears interest ?

Veterans' Welfare Board v. Riley

188 Cal. 607 · California Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1922

A. 431, 28 Pac. 951 ]; Conlin v. Board of Supervisors, 99 Cal. 17 [ 37 Am. St. Rep. 17 , 21 L. R. A. 474, 33 Pac. 753 ]; McClure v. Nye, 22 Cal. App. 248 [ 133 Pac. 1145 ]; Molineux v. … A. 431, 28 Pac. 951 ], supra; Conlin v. Board of Supervisors, 99 Cal. 21 [ 37 Am. St. Rep. 17 , 21 L. R.

Damrell v. Board of Supervisors

40 Cal. 154 · California Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1870

It is sufficiently shown in the petition in what particulars the Board exceeded its authority. … There are many valid objections to the proceedings before the Board, which are not mere matters of error.

Hill v. Board of Supervisors

176 Cal. 84 · California Supreme Court · Sep 7, 1917

It is conceded that this case has a close analogue in Hopping v. … To the same effect are State v. Ferguson, 104 La. 249 , [ 81 Am. St. Rep. 123 , 28 South. 917 ]; State v. Lancaster County, 17 Neb. 87 , [ 22 N. W. 228 ]; Oxnard Beet Sugar Co. v. State, 73 Neb. 57 , [ 102 N.

Hagenmeyer v. Board of Equalization

82 Cal. 214 · California Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1889

As this was made a part of the return, so far as the appellant could make it so, even although it was not properly a part thereof (Spring V. W. W. v. … The rule as to the matter of notice in such cases as that in hand is well stated in Spring Valley Water Works v. Schottler, 62 Cal. 103 , as follows: “In our opinion (as intimated in Patten v.

Klein v. Board of Education

1 Cal. 2d 706 · California Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1934

This decision was followed under similar facts in Fairchild v. Board of Education, 107 Cal. 92 [ 40 Pac. 26 ], and was approved in Barthel v. … In Cullen v. Board of Education, 126 Cal.

Weber v. Board of Supervisors

59 Cal. 265 · California Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1881

.: On the third day of February, 1880, the Board of Supervisors of Santa Clara County, by final order and judgment, located, established, and ordered to be opened a public road and highway over plaintiff’s land, and the land … was condemned for public use by said Board, under and by virtue of an Act of-the Legislature of this State, approved March 18th, 1874.

Board of Education v. Watson

63 Cal. 2d 829 · California Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1966

A summary of the relevant principles appears in Lelande v. … Hodge v. McCall (1921) 185 Cal. 330, 335 [ 197 P. 86 ].)

Packer v. Board of Retirement

35 Cal. 2d 212 · California Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1950

(Kern v. City of Long Beach, 29 Cal.2d 848, 851-853, 855, 856 [ 179 P.2d 799 ]; French v. French, 17 Cal.2d 775, 777 [ 112 P.2d 235 ]; Dryden v. Board of Pension Commrs., 6 Cal.2d 575, 579 [ 59 P.2d 104 ].) … As aptly shown by the decision in Jordan v. Retirement Board, supra [ 35 Cal.

Marion v. Board of Education

20 L.R.A. 197 · California Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1893

The case of Kennedy v. … The board so understood it;, for its record so discloses the fact. She,,taught under that authorization of the board.

Shepherd v. State Personnel Board

48 Cal. 2d 41 · California Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1957

State Board of Equalization, 29 Cal.2d 125, 131 [ 173 P.2d 545 ]; Pacific Greyhound Lines v. Railroad Com., 11 Cal.2d 427, 429 [ 80 P.2d 971 ] ; Griswold v. … It has also been squarely held that the findings of the board are not to be disturbed if supported by substantial evidence. (Black v. State Personnel Board, 136 Cal.App.2d 904, 909 [ 289 P.2d 863 ]; Genser v.

Board of Supervisors v. Simpson

36 Cal. 2d 671 · California Supreme Court · Feb 2, 1951

Whall v. Saenger Theatres Corp., 190 Miss. 391 [ 200 So. 442 ]; Hofferman v. Simmons, 177 Misc. 962 [ 32 N.Y.S.2d 244 ].) … It is aptly said in People v.

Linden v. Board of Supervisors

45 Cal. 6 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1872

Drake v. Regents, 4 Mich. 98 ; Heffner v. Commonwealth, 28 Penn. St. R. 108; Sanger v. County Commissioners of Kennebec, 25 Maine R. 291.) … The party applying here appears to have no interest, beneficial or otherwise, other than such interest as each one of the fourteen hundred and fifty-one persons, besides himself, who signed the petition to the Board of Supervisors

Board of Supervisors v. Lonergan

27 Cal. 3d 855 · California Supreme Court · Aug 14, 1980

Dist. v. … of Education v.

Johnston v. Board of Supervisors

31 Cal. 2d 66 · California Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1947

(Freeman v. Board of Adjustment, 97 Mont. 342, 354 [ 34 P.2d 534 ]; State v. Jacksonville, 101 Fla. 1241, 1242 [ 133 So. 114 ] ; L. & M. Investment Co. v. … (see Gilgert v.

Board of Education v. Martin

92 Cal. 209 · California Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1891

(Board of Education v. Fowler, 19 Cal. 24 .) The lands in question were originally held by the pueblo in trust for the public, and subject to the control of the Mexican government. … (Hart v. Burnett, 15 Cal. 530 ; Payne v. Treadwell, 16 Cal. 224 ; San Francisco v. Cannavan, 42 Cal. 541 ; Townsend v. Greeley, 5 Wall. 326 ; San Francisco v. Leroy, 138 U. S. 656 .)