Case law

Mass v. Board of Education

61 Cal. 2d 612 · California Supreme Court · Aug 11, 1964

(L a Rue v. Board of Trustees (1940) 40 Cal.App.2d 287, 296 [ 104 P.2d 689 ]; accord, Lotts v. Board of Park Comrs. (1936) 13 Cal.App.2d 625, 635 [ 57 P.2d 215 ]; see also Ed. … To the extent that language in Sheehan. v. Board of Police Comrs., supra (1922) 188 Cal. 525 , Nilsson v. State Personnel Board, supra (1939) 36 Cal.App.2d 186 , Jorgensen v.

Lennane v. Franchise Tax Board

9 Cal. 4th 263 · California Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1994

(Woods v. Young (1991) 53 Cal.3d 315, 323 [ 279 Cal.Rptr. 613 , 807 P.2d 455 ].) “To ascertain intent, we look first to the words of the statutes” (ibid.), “giving them their usual and ordinary meaning” (DaFonte v. … Co. v. Maori (1992) 4 Cal.4th 318, 326 [ 14 Cal.Rptr.2d 813 , 842 P.2d 112 ].)

Bogacki v. Board of Supervisors

5 Cal. 3d 771 · California Supreme Court · Oct 8, 1971

(See Stanton v. Dumke, supra, 64 Cal.2d 199, 205-207 .) Despite certain broad language in Fort v. Civil Service Commission, supra, 61 Cal.2d 331, 334 , and Hollon v. … (See Linberg v. Stanto (1931) 211 Cal. 771, 776 [ 297 P. 9 , 75 A.L.R. 555 ]; Rees v. Department of Motor Vehicles (1970) 8 Cal.App.3d 746, 749 [ 87 Cal.Rptr. 456 ]; Petersen v.

Skelly v. State Personnel Board

15 Cal. 3d 194 · California Supreme Court · Sep 16, 1975

In Board of Regents v. … (Shepherd v. State Personnel Board, supra, 48 Cal.2d 41, 51 ; see also Blake v. State Personnel Board (1972) 25 Cal.App.3d 541, 550-551, 554 [ 102 Cal.Rptr. 50 ].)

Mitchell v. Board of Education

137 Cal. 372 · California Supreme Court · Sep 20, 1902

Amongst these cases may be cited Brown v. Board of Education, 103 Cal. 531 ; Earle v. Board of Education, 55 Cal. 489 ; Miller v. Board of Education, 44 Cal. 166 ; Kennedy v. Board of Education, 82 Cal. 483 ; Raisch v. … Board of Education, 81 Cal. 542 ; Stoutenborough v. Board of Education, 104 Cal. 664 . For the foregoing reasons the appeals are dismissed.

Board of Education v. Watson

63 Cal. 2d 829 · California Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1966

A summary of the relevant principles appears in Lelande v. … Hodge v. McCall (1921) 185 Cal. 330, 335 [ 197 P. 86 ].)

Boren v. State Personnel Board

37 Cal. 2d 634 · California Supreme Court · Aug 10, 1951

(Grain v. Aldrich, 38 Cal. 514, 520 [99 Am.Dec. 423]; Brown v. Anderson-Cottonwood Irr. … , 309 [ 298 P. 485 ]; Board of Trustees v.

Bacich v. Board of Control

23 Cal. 2d 343 · California Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1943

Co., 208 Cal. 29 [ 280 P. 109 ]; Wilcox v. Engebretsen, 160 Cal. 288 [ 116 P. 750 ]; Williams v. Los Angeles Ry. Co., 150 Cal. 592 [ 89 P. 330 ]; Brown v. Board of Supervisors, 124 Cal. 274 [ 57 P. 82 ]; Geurkink v. … Reference is made to Bigley v. Nunan, 53 Cal. 403 , and Brown v. Board of Supervisors, 124 Cal. 274 [ 57 P. 82 ]. Neither of those cases involved a cul-de-sac.

Barber v. State Personnel Board

18 Cal. 3d 395 · California Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1976

(In re Marriage of Brown (1976) 15 Cal.3d 838, 850 [ 126 Cal.Rptr. 633 , 544 P.2d 561 ]; Westbrook v. Mihaly (1970) 2 Cal.3d 765, 800-801 [ 87 Cal.Rptr. 839 , 471 P.2d 487 ]; cf. Li v. … (In re Marriage of Brown, supra, 15 Cal.3d at p. 850; Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & Gelfand (1971) 6 Cal.3d 176 , 193 [ 98 Cal.Rptr. 837 , 491 P.2d 421 ].)

Brown v. Terra Bella Irrigation District

51 Cal. 2d 33 · California Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1958

(Van Slyke v. Arrowhead etc. Power Co., 155 Cal. 675, 679 [ 102 P. 816 ].) The defendant district contends that the limitation in the present case is, in legal terminology and effect, a reservation. … (Sheean v. Michel, 6 Cal.2d 324, 328 [ 57 P.2d 127 ].) [3] In the present case an interest in the reversion was existent in the grantor upon the execution of the deed.

McCoy v. Board of Supervisors

18 Cal. 2d 193 · California Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1941

Its primary object, as declared in the early case of People v. … See, also, Kennedy v. Cook 285 Ky. 9 [ 146 S. W. (2d) 56 ]; Carpenter v. Sheppard, 135 Tex. 413 [ 145 S. W. (2d) 562 ].

Brown v. Valley View Mining Co.

127 Cal. 630 · California Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1900

(Gleason v. Gleason, 54 Cal. 135 .) … In Gleason v.

Board of Commissioners v. Younger

29 Cal. 172 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1865

(Marvin v. Bennett, 26 Wend. 169 ; 8 Paige, 312 .) … (Marvin v. Bennett, supra; Northrop v. Sumner, 27 Barb, 196 ; The Morris Canal Company v. Emmett, 9 Paige, 168 .)

Cohen v. Board of Supervisors

40 Cal. 3d 277 · California Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1985

(Sunset Amusement Co. v. Board of Police Commissioners (1972) 7 Cal.3d 64, 72 [ 101 Cal.Rptr. 768 , 496 P.2d 840 ].) … The board heard from three individuals regarding the proposed ordinance. Chief of Police Cornelius Murphy and Mayor Dianne Feinstein submitted letters to the board urging approval of the law.

Keys v. Board of Supervisors

42 Cal. 252 · California Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1871

Church v. … Agnew and others v.

Veterans' Welfare Board v. Riley

188 Cal. 607 · California Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1922

A. 431, 28 Pac. 951 ]; Conlin v. Board of Supervisors, 99 Cal. 17 [ 37 Am. St. Rep. 17 , 21 L. R. A. 474, 33 Pac. 753 ]; McClure v. Nye, 22 Cal. App. 248 [ 133 Pac. 1145 ]; Molineux v. … A. 431, 28 Pac. 951 ], supra; Conlin v. Board of Supervisors, 99 Cal. 21 [ 37 Am. St. Rep. 17 , 21 L. R.

Siller v. Board of Supervisors

58 Cal. 2d 479 · California Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1962

Co. v. Kings County Water Dist. (1956) 47 Cal.2d 140, 143 [1] [ 302 P.2d 1 ]; Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals (1943) 23 Cal.2d 303, 315 [5] [ 144 P.2d 4 ].) … Board of Zoning Appeals (1950) 301 N.Y. 86 [ 92 N.E.2d 903 ]; Devaney v. Board of Zoning Appeals (1946) 132 Conn. 537 [ 45 A.2d 828 ].)

Shepherd v. State Personnel Board

48 Cal. 2d 41 · California Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1957

State Board of Equalization, 29 Cal.2d 125, 131 [ 173 P.2d 545 ]; Pacific Greyhound Lines v. Railroad Com., 11 Cal.2d 427, 429 [ 80 P.2d 971 ] ; Griswold v. … It has also been squarely held that the findings of the board are not to be disturbed if supported by substantial evidence. (Black v. State Personnel Board, 136 Cal.App.2d 904, 909 [ 289 P.2d 863 ]; Genser v.

Board of Supervisors v. Simpson

36 Cal. 2d 671 · California Supreme Court · Feb 2, 1951

Whall v. Saenger Theatres Corp., 190 Miss. 391 [ 200 So. 442 ]; Hofferman v. Simmons, 177 Misc. 962 [ 32 N.Y.S.2d 244 ].) … It is aptly said in People v.

Fry v. Board of Education

17 Cal. 2d 753 · California Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1941

“It must be conceded that, within the limits fixed by the School Code, the Board has discretionary control over the salaries of teachers. (Fidler v. Board of Trustees, 112 Cal. App. 296 [ 296 Pac. 912 ]; Abraham v. … A teacher employed but on leave of absence is, nevertheless, an employee of the Board. (Fairchild v. Board of Education, 107 Cal. 92 [ 40 Pac. 26 ]; Kennedy v. Board of Education, 82 Cal. 483 [ 22 Pac. 1042 ].)