Case law

Brown v. Republic Productions, Inc.

26 Cal. 2d 867 · California Supreme Court · Sep 14, 1945

(See Klein v. Beach (1916), 232 F. 240, 247 (1917), 239 F. 108 [ 151 C.C.A. 282 ]; Lee Chuck v. … Therefore, as stated in Delanoy v.

Garrison v. Edward Brown & Sons

28 Cal. 2d 28 · California Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1946

(Caminetti v. Edward Brown *30 & Sons, 23 Cal.2d 511 [ 144 P.2d 570 ].) The appeal thereafter reached this court on the judgment roll alone, and the judgment was reversed. (Garrison v. … (Garrison v. Edward Brown & Sons, supra, 25 Cal.2d at p. 477 .) The defendant relies on the following statement in Johns v.

Dickey v. Retirement Board

16 Cal. 3d 745 · California Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1976

{Dryden v. Board of Pension Commrs., supra, 6 Cal.2d 575, 579 .) … (See and compare Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn., supra, 11 Cal.3d 28, 45-46 ; Kern v. City of Long Beach, supra, 29 Cal.2d 848, 853.) 2 The Board relies on Tyra v. Board of Police etc.

Beckley v. Reclamation Board

48 Cal. 2d 710 · California Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1957

In Greenamyer v. Board of Lugo E. S. … In Hallett v.

Brown v. City of Los Angeles

183 Cal. 783 · California Supreme Court · Oct 1, 1920

(Varcoe v. Lee, 180 Cal. 338 , [ 181 Pac. 223 ].) … In re Smith, supra, declared invalid an ordinance of the board of supervisors of Los Angeles County prohibiting the establishment of a gas plant in Arroyo Seco.

Brown v. Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation Distrist

183 Cal. 186 · California Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1920

The ease comes directly within the principle of Randolph v. Harris, 28 Cal. 561, 565 , [ 87 Am. … (See, also, Gray v. Dougherty, 25 Cal. 266, 282 ; and Farmers’ Exchange Bank v. Altura etc. Co., 129 Cal. 263, 270 , [ 61 Pac. 1077 ].)

People Ex Rel. Deukmejian v. Brown

29 Cal. 3d 150 · California Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1981

the same board. … (D'Amico v. Board of Medical Examiners, supra, 11 Cal.3d at p. 15 .)

Brown v. Crown Gold Milling Co.

150 Cal. 376 · California Supreme Court · Jan 29, 1907

(Wilkins v. Stidger, 22 Cal. 236 , [ 83 Am. Dec. 64 ]; Abadie v. Carillo, 32 Cal. 173 ; De la Guerra v. Newhall, 55 Cal. 21 .) Appellant relies upon the cases of Owens v. … It was sufficient that the majority of the board individually were advised of the terms of the employment of plaintiff by Mr. Doe, and took no measures to disaffirm as directors that employment. (Pixley v.

Brown v. Poway Unified School District

4 Cal. 4th 820 · California Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1993

On the last trip back to his van, Brown slipped and fell. The employees who helped Brown to his feet found a fresh slice of lunch meat stuck to the sole of his shoe. Brown sued the District. … Brown does not challenge this ruling.

Brown v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.

167 Cal. 199 · California Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1914

In this behalf counsel cite such cases as Schneider v. Market St. Ry. Co., 134 Cal. 482 , [ 66 Pac. 734 ] ; Bresee v. Los Angeles Traction Co., 149 Cal. 137 , [5 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1059, 85 Pac. 152]; Hoff v. … (Hamlin v. Pacific Electric Co., 150 Cal. 779 , [ 89 Pac. 1109 ].) If Mr.

State of South Dakota v. Brown

20 Cal. 3d 765 · California Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1978

The high court has not hesitated to order state and local officials to comply with constitutionally required school desegregation (see, e.g., Brown v. … Board of Education (1955) 349 U.S. 294 [ 99 L.Ed. 1083 , 75 S.Ct. 753 ]; Green v.

Brown v. Canadian Indus. Alcohol Co.

209 Cal. 596 · California Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1930

Brown and R. Harold Brown, her son. … Harold *598 Brown, and plaintiff has appealed.

Nat'l Asian Am. Coal. v. Brown

238 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 · California Supreme Court · Oct 10, 2018

Brown v. Winter & Sherry

14 Cal. 31 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1859

, and Brown became the purchaser, he acquired the title. … Those cases were in equity—as was also the case recently decided in this Court from Nevada, (Kelsey v. Abbott & Edwards.)

Brown v. Domestic Utilities Manufacturing Co.

172 Cal. 733 · California Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1916

(Burkle v. Levy, 70 Cal. 250 , [11 Pac. 643]; Hammond v. Wallace, 85 Cal. 522 , [ 20 Am. St. Rep. 239 , 24 Pac. 837 ]; Marten v. Paul O. Burns Wine Co., 99 Cal. 355 , [ 33 Pac. 1107 ].) … In the case of McGue v.

Brown v. San Francisco Savings Union

134 Cal. 448 · California Supreme Court · Nov 5, 1901

In instance, however, may be cited, Wristen v. Bowles, 82 Cal. 84 ; Litz v. Goosling, 93 Ky. 185 ; Weaver v. Burr, 31 W. Va. 736 ; Gordon v. Darnell, 5 Col. 302 ; Coleman v. Applegarth, 68 Md. 21 ; 1 Connor v. … Co. v. Bartlett, 3 Cush. 224 ; Ide v. Leiser, 10 Mont. 5 . 2 For the foregoing reasons the judgment and order are reversed and the cause remanded. Temple, J., and McFarland, J., concurred. 1 6 Am. St.

Brown v. Great Northern Railway Co.

38 Cal. 2d 42 · California Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1951

that if the said board could not accept, its one-third should go to the other “two Pension Boards ... in equal parts.” … Com. v.

P. A. Buell & Co. v. Brown

131 Cal. 158 · California Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1900

The materialman, in this case, did not sell the materials to the owners of the land, but to Brown who was building the barn. … (Wilson v. Nugent, 125 Cal. 283 , and cases cited.)

Brown Derby Hollywood Corp. v. Hatton

61 Cal. 2d 855 · California Supreme Court · Oct 29, 1964

In 1952, Broadway subleased the property for the remainder of its term to plaintiff, Brown Derby Hollywood Corporation. The sublease contained the same privilege of entry as the lease to Broadway. … (Christensen v. Tucker, 114 Cal.App.2d 554, 559 [ 250 P.2d 660 ]; see Dolske v. Gormley, 58 Cal.2d 513 [ 25 Cal.Rptr. 270 , 375 P.2d 174 ]; Pahl v. Ribero, 193 Cal.App.2d 154, 163 [ 14 Cal.Rptr. 174 ]; Baglione v.

Reclamation Board v. Riley

208 Cal. 661 · California Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1930

Drainage Dist. v. … Johnson, 192 Cal. 211 [219 Pac. 442]; Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage Dist. v. Riley, 194 Cal. 624 [ 229 Pac. 957 ]; Sacramento etc. Drainage Dist. v. Riley, supra; Reclamation Board v. Chambers, 46 Cal.