Case law

Brown v. San Francisco

16 Cal. 451 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1860

In Hart v. … We remarked, in Hart v.

People v. Brown

62 Cal. 2d 901 · California Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1965

In People v. Fields, ante, p. 538 [ 42 Cal.Rptr. 833 , 399 P.2d 369 ], filed this day, it is concluded that such an order is a final judgment in a special proceeding, and for that reason appealable. (Code Civ.

People v. Brown

55 Cal. 2d 908 · California Supreme Court · May 1, 1961

. — The facts and legal issues presented on this appeal are substantially the same as those in People v. Keener, ante, p. 714 [ 12 Cal.Rptr. 859 , 361 P.2d 587 ], this day decided, and that decision is controlling here.

Chico High School Board v. Board of Supervisors

118 Cal. 115 · California Supreme Court · Sep 10, 1897

The board of education of the city of Chico constitutes the Chico high school board, and its members are elected by the voters of the whole district. The appellant in this action is the high school board. … the board of trustees of the city of Chico?

Phelps v. Brown

3 Cal. Unrep. 427 · California Supreme Court · Aug 7, 1891

Brown & Ensign. July 25, 1887. We agree to release the signers of this receipt from any expense, legal or otherwise. Brown & Ensign.” … Rep. 187 , 24 Pac. 280 ; Drew v. Pedlar, 87 Cal. 443 , 22 Am. St. Rep. 257 , 25 Pac. 749 .

Brown v. Griffith

2 Cal. Unrep. 625 · California Supreme Court · Jan 26, 1886

As was said by this court in White v.

People v. Brown

59 Cal. 345 · California Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1881

(The People v. Kerrick, 52 Cal. 446 , and cases therein referred to.) Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered.

Hurd v. Brown

176 Cal. 381 · California Supreme Court · Oct 20, 1917

(See in this connection, Estate of Kicks, 160 Cal. 461 , [ 117 Pac. 532 ]; Estate of Lavinburg, 161 Cal. 543 , [ 119 Pac. 915 ]; Estate of Higgins, supra; Estate of McDevitt, 95 Cal. 17, 33 , [ 30 Pac. 101 ]; Coghill v.

People v. Brown

53 Cal. 65 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1878

(Penal Code, sec. 1323; People v. Tyler, 36 Cal. 522 .) Judgment and order reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial. Remittitur forthwith.

People v. Brown

55 Cal. 2d 908 · California Supreme Court · May 1, 1961

. — The facts and legal issues presented on this appeal are substantially the same as those in People v. Keener, ante, p. 714 [ 12 Cal.Rptr. 859 , 361 P.2d 587 ], this day decided, and that decision is controlling here.

Orton v. Brown

117 Cal. 501 · California Supreme Court · Jul 8, 1897

(Orton v. Brown, 113 Cal. 561 .) We can conceive of no reason why both appeals were not taken at the same time. … Brown, as sheriff of Humboldt county. The plaintiff is the assignee of the Consumers’ Lumber Company, an insolvent corporation.

Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co.

48 Cal. 3d 711 · California Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1989

San Francisco Shopping News (1935) 4 Cal.App.2d 284, 287-288 [ 40 P.2d 940 ] [city council president]; Harris v. Curtis Publishing Co. (1942) 49 Cal.App.2d 340, 349 [ 121 P.2d 761 ] [school board president]; Babcock v. … Valley News (1981) 121 N.H. 258 [ 428 A.2d 493, 494 ]; Marchiondo v. Brown (1982) 98 N.M. 394 [ 649 P.2d 462, 470 ]; Walters v. Sanford Herald, Inc. (1976) 31 N.C. Ct. App. 233 [ 228 S.E.2d 766, 767 ]; Lansdowne v.

Brown v. Industrial Accident Commission

174 Cal. 457 · California Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1917

(Anderson v. Foley Bros., 110 Minn. 151 , [ 124 N. W. 987 ].) The findings show that Skidmore had worked for Brown for more than two years, devoting all of his time as a salesman for his. properties. … (Green v. Soule, 145 Cal. 96 , [ 78 Pac. 337 ], See Western Indemnity Co. v. Pillsbury, 172 Cal. 807 , [ 159 Pac. 721 ].) But Skidmore did not contract to produce any particular result.

Brown v. George Pepperdine Foundation

23 Cal. 2d 256 · California Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1943

Brown reached the door it would not open. … Co. v. Jester, 180 Ind. 357 [ 101 N.E. 915 , L.R.A. 1915E 721 ]; 32 Am.Jur. 617, sec. 740; see, also, Hussey v. Long Dock R. Co., 100 N.J.L. 380 [ 126 A. 314 ]; Cramblitt v.

Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown

29 Cal. 3d 168 · California Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1981

(Veterans' Welfare Board v. Jordan (1922) 189 Cal. 124, 143 [ 208 P. 284 , 22 A.L.R. 1515 ].) … Deukmejian v. Brown (1981) ante, page 150 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 478 , 624 P.2d 1206 ]. Article VII, sections 1, 2 and 3, the constitutional sections most relevant to the present case, provide in pertinent part: “Section 1.

People v. Brown

212 Cal. Rptr. 3d 135 · California Supreme Court · Jan 11, 2017

Review in the above-captioned matter, which was granted and held for Harris v. Superior Court (2016) 1 Cal.5th 984 , 209 Cal.Rptr.3d 584 , 383 P.3d 648 , is hereby dismissed. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.528(b)(1).)

Estate of Lucas v. Brown

23 Cal. 2d 454 · California Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1943

Brown rejected the' claim of Reid’s executor for the payment of the principal and interest assertedly due upon it. … (Fender v. Phillips, supra; Lake v. Pattie, 116 Va. 130 [ 81 S.E. 78 ]; Badders v.

People v. Brown

214 Cal. Rptr. 3d 717 · California Supreme Court · Mar 15, 2017

**374 The above-entitled matter is transferred to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two, with directions to vacate its decision and to reconsider the cause in light of People v.

Brown v. Town of Sebastopol

153 Cal. 704 · California Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1908

It is established, moreover, that after the work was done Brown appeared before the board of trustees as a board of equalization, objecting to the assessment to him of the triangular tract for the reason that it was no longer … The finding of *709 the court that Brown entered into the agreement with the members of the board of trustees of the town of Sebastopol, instead of with the town of Sebastopol, is without significance.

Garrison v. Edward Brown & Sons

25 Cal. 2d 473 · California Supreme Court · Dec 26, 1944

Brown, 196 U.S. 502 [ 25 S.Ct. 339 , 49 L.Ed. 571 ]; Alvord v. Ryan, 212 F. 83, 85 [ 128 C.C.A. 539 ]; Sperb v. McCoun, 110 N.Y. 605 [ 18 N.E. 441 , 1 L.R.A. 490 ]; Topas v. … (Bleau v. Wright, 110 Mich. 183 [ 68 N.W. 115 ]; Finnegan v. Geoghegan, 111 N.Y.S. 656 ; Tripple v. Littlefield, 46 Wash. 156 [ 89 P. 493 ]; Cooper v, Tim, 16 Misc. 372 [ 38 N.Y.S. 67 ]; Huffman v. Newman, 55.