Case law

Brown v. Graves

2 Cal. 118 · California Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1852

German v. Brown

3 Cal. Unrep. 864 · California Supreme Court · May 13, 1893

Garcia v. Brown

146 Cal. 68 · California Supreme Court · Jan 24, 1905

Under rule V of this court, appellant’s points and authorities not having been filed, this appeal is subject to be dismissed *70 on motion o£ the respondents, upon notice given to the appellant.

Brown v. Curb

26 Cal. 3d 110 · California Supreme Court · Dec 27, 1979

(See Conger v. Gilmer (1867) 32 Cal. 75 [board of supervisors could reconsider appointment before issuing appointee a commission]; Harrington v. Pardee (1905) 1 Cal.App. 278 [ 82 P. 83 ].) … Todd v. Essling (1964) 268 Minn. 151, 156 [ 128 N.W. 2d 307 ].) Therefore we conclude that Governor Brown’s withdrawal of the Arabian appointment was valid.

Brown v. Smith

10 Cal. 508 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1858

Brown v. Superior Court

3 Cal. 3d 427 · California Supreme Court · Nov 6, 1970

The first of such cases (Smith v. … Although, as stated, the holdings in Smith v. Trapp, supra, 249 Cal. App.2d 929 , LaBorde v. McKesson & Robbins, Inc., supra, 264 Cal.App. 2d 363 , Bennett v. Unger, supra, 272 Cal.App.2d 202 , and Garrett v.

Smith v. Brown

5 Cal. 118 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1855

Van Valkenburg v. Brown

43 Cal. 43 · California Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1872

(Dred Scott v. Sanford, 19 How. 393 .) … (Campbell v. Morris, 3 Harr. & McH. 554.)

Maddux v. Brown

91 Cal. 523 · California Supreme Court · Oct 8, 1891

(People v. Cowell, 60 Cal. 400 .) … The second application of Brown is not accompanied by a certificate of a survey of the land he desired to purchase, made upon his application by the county surveyor, as required by section 3445 of the Political Code.

Brown v. Superior Court

175 Cal. 141 · California Supreme Court · May 16, 1917

Brown. … The same conclusion upon similar *143 facts was reached by the court in Bank in Fiske v. Gosbey, 168 Cal. 334 , [ 143 Pac. 611 ].

Brown v. Superior Court

72 Cal. 14 · California Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1887

People v. Brown

California Supreme Court · Sep 12, 2012

CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, ) ) Plaintiff and Respondent, ) ) S181963 v. … ) ) Ct.App. 3 C056510 JAMES LEE BROWN III, ) ) Lassen

Board of Education v. Board of Trustees

129 Cal. 599 · California Supreme Court · Sep 4, 1900

(Wells, Fargo & Co. v. Board of Equalization, 56 Cal. 198 .) Accordingly this was the view of the constitution in McCabe v. … (Kennedy v. Miller, supra; San Diego v. Dauer, 97 Cal. 442 ; Kennedy v. Board of Education, 82 Cal. 483 .)

Board of Education v. Board of Trustees

96 Cal. 42 · California Supreme Court · Aug 25, 1892

. — The board of education of the city of Sacramento, on the first day of February, 1892, submitted to the board of trustees of that city, in accordance with the act of April 27, 1863 (Stats. 1863, p. 717), a statement of … If, as is contended by the appellants, the board of trustees has no function in the matter other than to comply with the requirements of the board of education, there would seem to be no reason why the board of education

Brown v. Superior Court

33 Cal. 3d 242 · California Supreme Court · Nov 1, 1982

In point is County of Los Angeles v. … In County of Yolo v.

Griffeth & Dalzel v. Brown

76 Cal. 260 · California Supreme Court · May 25, 1888

go also to Brown. … (Biddle Boggs v. Merced M. Co., 14 Cal. 368 ; Davis v. Davis, 26 Cal. 38 ; 85 Am. *263 Dec. 157 .)

Brown v. Superior Court

15 Cal. 3d 52 · California Supreme Court · Aug 21, 1975

Board of Health (1899) 127 Cal. 388, 399 [ 59 P. 702 ]; Kenyon v. Western Union Tel. Co. (1893) 100 Cal. 454, 457 [ 35 P. 75 ]; Oxley v. County of Orange (1964) 228 Cal.App.2d 620, 621 [ 39 Cal.Rptr. 697 ].) … Petitions have been filed with this court in Phillips v. Brown (S.F. 23294) and Bright v. Brown (S.F. 23298), which concern the removal of public representatives from the South Coast Regional Commission, and Conde v.

Brown v. Klemmer

150 Cal. 454 · California Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1907

We are unable to find in the statutes any authorization for the order made by the board of supervisors. … This is established by the decision in the case of Potter v.

Board of Commissioners v. Board of Trustees

71 Cal. 310 · California Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1886

This is an application of the board of commissioners of the Funded Debt Sinking Fund to compel the board of trustees of Sacramento city, by mandate, to levy a certain tax which is ordered to be levied by an act of the legislature … (County of Contra Costa v. Board of Supervisors, 26 Cal. 641 .)

Flores v. Brown

39 Cal. 2d 622 · California Supreme Court · Oct 9, 1952

39 Cal.2d 622 (1952) 248 P.2d 922 ANITA FLORES et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. ERNEST W. BROWN et al., Defendants and Appellants. MARIA ZAVALA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ERNEST W. … If Brown was hauling the trailer as a mere favor to Murray, or as an independent contractor, negligence may not be imputed. ( Edwards v. Freeman, 34 Cal.2d 589, 592 [ 212 P.2d 883 ]; Malloy v.