Case law

People v. Brown

62 Cal. 2d 901 · California Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1965

In People v. Fields, ante, p. 538 [ 42 Cal.Rptr. 833 , 399 P.2d 369 ], filed this day, it is concluded that such an order is a final judgment in a special proceeding, and for that reason appealable. (Code Civ.

Green v. Brown

37 Cal. 2d 391 · California Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1951

Brown and Zephrene C. … Brown and Zephrene C.

People v. Brown

74 Cal. 306 · California Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1887

The defendants were prosecuted for procuring false evidence, to wit, an affidavit to be used on the motion for a new trial in Sharon v. Sharon, from a person who was to their knowledge incapable of making an affidavit. … that time the said Isabella Clark was of unsound mind, and with said knowledge caused her to subscribe to said affidavit, with the intent to. produce said affidavit, or allow it to be produced, in the. action of Sharon v.

Clark v. Brown

83 Cal. 181 · California Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1890

It is alleged in the complaint, substantially, that in 1880 the plaintiff and the defendants Brown and Flaherty entered into a mining copartnership for the purpose of working mining claims situated in Tuolumne County, called … said date until October 25, 1887, when Flaherty sold to the defendants Clark and Crittenden “ his interest in the above mine and claim and business, since which date said defendants Clark and Crittenden have with defendant Brown

Brown v. Green

8 Cal. 4th 812 · California Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1994

Finnegan v. … v.

Brown v. Starr

79 Cal. 608 · California Supreme Court · Jul 4, 1889

These views are in entire accord with the cases of Spencer v. Qeissman, 37 Oal. 99, and Brooks v. Hyde, 37 Cal. 366 . The orders appealed from are affirmed.

Brown v. Kahn

176 Cal. 159 · California Supreme Court · Sep 18, 1917

The case of Fitzell v. … “In the case of Selna v.

Brown v. Hite

64 Cal. 2d 120 · California Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1966

(Holbrook v. Board of Directors etc. Irr. Dist. (1937) 8 Cal.2d 158, 161 [ 64 P.2d 430 ]; Boyd v. Huntington (1932) 215 Cal. 473, 479-480 [ 11 P.2d 383 ].) … They cite Holbrook v. Board of Directors etc. Irr.

Baker v. Brown

82 Cal. 64 · California Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1889

Chapin v. Brown

101 Cal. 500 · California Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1894

On August 15, 1887, a written contract between the co-partnership and two of its individual members, namely, Chapin and the defendant, Brown, was executed, by which the copartnership agreed to sell to Chapin and Brown, and … As to the amount of lumber to be sawed, they agreed to be governed by the above-mentioned contract with Chapin and Brown.

Lutz v. Brown

182 Cal. 707 · California Supreme Court · May 7, 1920

(Ha lleck v. Moss, 22 Cal. 266 .) [2] Between this decision and the present case there is no possible distinction. Defendant’s counsel cite First National Bank v. Story, 200 N. Y. 346 , [ 93 N. E. 940 , 21 Ann.

Hurd v. Brown

176 Cal. 381 · California Supreme Court · Oct 20, 1917

(See in this connection, Estate of Kicks, 160 Cal. 461 , [ 117 Pac. 532 ]; Estate of Lavinburg, 161 Cal. 543 , [ 119 Pac. 915 ]; Estate of Higgins, supra; Estate of McDevitt, 95 Cal. 17, 33 , [ 30 Pac. 101 ]; Coghill v.

Ramirez v. Brown

12 Cal. 3d 912 · California Supreme Court · Nov 29, 1974

In Ramirez v. … (Richardson v. Ramirez (1974) 418 U.S. 24 [ 41 L.Ed.2d 551 , 94 S.Ct. 2655 ].)

Brown v. Burbank

64 Cal. 99 · California Supreme Court · Aug 28, 1883

Mutual Life Insurance v. City of Los Angeles

50 Cal. 3d 402 · California Supreme Court · Mar 26, 1990

Co. v. Franchise Tax Board (1956) 145 Cal.App.2d 60, 64 [ 302 P.2d 79 ].) … Co. v. Franchise Tax Board, supra, 145 Cal.App.2d at p. 63 .)

Brown v. Mullin

65 Cal. 89 · California Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1884

Brown v. McKay

125 Cal. 291 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1899

Orton v. Brown

113 Cal. 561 · California Supreme Court · Jul 28, 1896

Plaintiff is the assignee of the Consumers’ Lumber Company, an insolvent corporation, which operated in Humboldt county, and defendant Brown is the sheriff of said county. … (San Francisco v. Pixley, 21 Cal. 56 ; Hibberd v. Smith, 67 Cal. 565 ; Frink v. Roe, 70 Cal. 303 ; Marston v. White, 91 Cal. 40 .)

Kelly v. Brown

2 Cal. Unrep. 536 · California Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1885

Spelling v. Brown

122 Cal. 277 · California Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1898