Case law

Armenta v. Churchill

42 Cal. 2d 448 · California Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1954

Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 19 Cal.2d 181, 188 [ 120 P.2d 1 ].) As was said in Smulson v. … Brown, 97 Cal.App.2d 361, 364 [ 217 P.2d 995 ]) or to introduce evidence in the light of an ambiguous or confused admission (Martin v. Miqueu, 37 Cal. App.2d 133, 135-136 [ 98 P.2d 816 ]) are not in point.

People v. DeVaughn

18 Cal. 3d 889 · California Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1977

(Brown v. Illinois, supra, 422 U.S. 590, 599-600 [ 45 L.Ed.2d 416, 424-425 ].) … Brown confessed at the station house within less than two hours of the illegal arrest. (Brown v.

Bollinger v. Wright

143 Cal. 292 · California Supreme Court · May 16, 1904

(Myers v. Reinstein, 67 Cal. 90 .) Nor in an action to enforce a mechanic’s lien against the executors of a deceased person where the buildings were erected by deceased in his lifetime. (Booth v. Pendola, 88 Cal. 42 .) … (Poulson v.

International Federation of Professional & Technical Engineers, Local 21 v. Superior Court

64 Cal. Rptr. 3d 693 · California Supreme Court · Aug 27, 2007

Brown (La.Ct.App. 1975) 323 So.2d 217 (sheriff required to disclose records of salary fund); Moberly v. … Lebanon School Bd. (1972) 112 N.H. 160 [ 290 A.2d 866 ] (school board required to disclose teachers’ salaries); Matter of Winston v.

Big Creek Lumber Co. v. County of Santa Cruz

45 Cal. Rptr. 3d 21 · California Supreme Court · Jun 29, 2006

without submission of a timber harvesting plan and approval by the Director of Forestry and Fire Protection or by the Board on appeal. (§§ 4581-4582, 4582.7; see generally Big Creek v. … (See Morehart v. County of Santa Barbara, supra, 7 Cal.4th at p. 748.) Our primary task when interpreting a statute is to determine the Legislature’s intent. (Brown v.

Carrillo v. ACF Industries, Inc.

86 Cal. Rptr. 2d 832 · California Supreme Court · Jul 27, 1999

Opinion BROWN, J. Under the supremacy clause of the United States Constitution (art. … the regulations made mention of “dome running boards.”

Golden Gateway v. Golden Gateway Tenants Ass'n

111 Cal. Rptr. 2d 336 · California Supreme Court · Aug 30, 2001

Opinion BROWN, J. … (See Browne, Rep. of Debates in Convention of Cal. on Formation of State Const. (1973 ed.) p. 41 (Browne); see also Private Actors, supra, 17 Hastings Const. L.Q. at p. 119.)

Pattison v. Bd. of Supervisors of Yuba Cty.

13 Cal. 175 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1859

(Sharpless v. Mayor of Philadelphia, 21 Penn. R. 147; Commonwealth v. McWilliams, 11 Id. 62; The Cincinnati, etc. R. R. Co. v. Commissioner of Clinton County, 21 Ohio 77 ; Cass v. Dillon, 22 Id. 607; Talbot v. … Co. 15 Conn. 475 ; Goddin v. Crump, 8 Leigh, 120 ; Harrison Justices v. Holland, 3 Grattan, 247; Taylor v. Commissioners of Newbern, 2 Jones, 141 ; see, also, Thomas v. Leland, 24 Wend. 65 ; People v.

People v. Pinches

214 Cal. 177 · California Supreme Court · Oct 29, 1931

(Warner v. Warner, 100 Cal. 11 [ 34 Pac. 523 ].) The appellant asks that the case of State v. … Duffy, 104 Cal. 602 [ 38 Pac. 443 ]; Staacke v. Bell, 125 Cal. 309 [ 57 Pac. 1012 ]; Warner v. Warner, 100 Cal. 11 [ 34 Pac. 523 ]; Security Loan etc. Co. v. Kauffman, 108 Cal. 214 [ 41 Pac. 467 ]; Brown v.

Lybarger v. City of Los Angeles

40 Cal. 3d 822 · California Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1985

Brown and Linda K. Lefkowitz, Deputy City Attorneys, for Defendant and Respondent. OPINION LUCAS, J. … (See Slochower v. Board of Education (1956) 350 U.S. 551 [ 100 L.Ed. 692 , 76 S.Ct. 637 ]; Bogacki v. Board of Supervisors (1971) 5 Cal.3d 771, 784-807 [ 97 Cal.

Beals v. Bd. of Supervisors of Amador Cty.

35 Cal. 624 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1868

The case of The Town of Guilford v. … (See, also, People v. Alameda County, 26 Cal. 641 ; Napa Valley R. R. Co. v. Napa County, 30 Cal. 435 .)

Guardianship of Gilman

23 Cal. 2d 862 · California Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1944

(Sullivan v. Dunne, 198 Cal. 183, 192 [ 244 P. 343 ]; Estate of Sullivan, 198 Cal. 195, 196 [ 244 P. 347 ].) Here, the affidavit of Mrs. … Brown to appear for her or to take the appeal and that he is proceeding without her authority and against her wishes. Any purported appeal under such circumstances would be ineffectual. (Sullivan v.

Austin v. Hallmark Oil Co.

21 Cal. 2d 718 · California Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1943

(Fry v. Board of Education, 17 Cal. 2d 753 [112 P.2d 229]; Toomey v. Toomey, 13 Cal.2d 317 [ 89 P.2d 634 ]; Wol *735 pert v. Gripton, 213 Cal. 474 [ 2 P.2d 767 ]; Newport v. Hatton, 195 Cal. 132 [ 231 P. 987 ]; Brown v. … Lauterhach, 164 Cal. 591 [ 130 P. 2 ]; Brown v. State Personnel Board, supra.)

Reuter v. Bd. of Supervisors of San Mateo

220 Cal. 314 · California Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1934

(Knowles v. Yates, 31 Cal. 82, 89 .) … In Wilkinson v. Lund, 102 Cal.

Belli v. State Bar

10 Cal. 3d 824 · California Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1974

Citing Valentine v. … In Martin v.

Comptoir D'Escompte De Paris v. Dresbach

78 Cal. 15 · California Supreme Court · Dec 29, 1888

(See Brewster v. Bours, 8 Cal. 501 ; Griffith v. Grogan, 12 Cal. 317 ; Higgins v. Wortell, 18 Cal. 333 ; Crary v. Bowers, 20 Cal. 89 ; Smith v. Owens, 21 Cal. 11 ; Brown v. Cronise, 21 Cal. 386 ; Welch v. … Allington, 23 Cal. 322 ; Mitchell v. Hockett, 25 Cal. 542 ; 85 Am. Dec. 151 ; Brown v. Olmstead, 50 Cal. 162 ; Crawford v. Roberts, 50 Cal. 236 .)

Linforth v. Montgomery

195 Cal. 49 · California Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1924

v. … The action of Montgomery v. Meyerstein was commenced on October 6, 1917.

In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation District

92 Cal. 296 · California Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1891

(Diggins v. Brown, 76 Cal. 318 .) Assessments have also been upheld when made by commissioners appointed to make specific assessments upon the several parcels of land (Pacific Bridge Co. v. … (Blair v. Hamilton, 32 Cal. 52 ; Whitney v. Board of Delegates, 14 Cal. 479 ; Lowe v. Alexander, 15 Cal. 300 .) The object of the act in question, as was said in Board of Directors v.

People v. Loper

159 Cal. 6 · California Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1910

You couldn’t pay your board bill. … Justice Brown in the case of Brown v. Walker, 161 U. S. 596 , [16 Sup. Ct. 646].

Kasky v. Nike, Inc.

119 Cal. Rptr. 2d 296 · California Supreme Court · Jan 10, 2003

(a); see Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co. (1989) 48 Cal.3d 711, 746 [ 257 Cal.Rptr. 708 , 111 P.2d 406 ].) … (Board of Trustees, State Univ. of N.Y. v. Fox, supra, 492 U.S. at p. 474 [ 109 S.Ct. at p. 3031 ], italics omitted.)