Case law

Empresa Siderurgica, S.A. v. County of Merced

32 Cal. 2d 68 · California Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1948

(Richfield Oil Corp. v. United Bd. of Eq., 329 U.S. 69, 79 [ 67 S.Ct. 156 , 91 L.Ed. 80 ]; Turpin v. Burgess, 117 U.S. 504, 506 [ 6 S.Ct. 835 , 29 L.Ed. 988 ]; Brown v. Maryland, 12 Wheat. (U.S.) 419 [ 6 L.Ed. 678 ].) … In Von Hamm-Young Co. v.

Armenta v. Churchill

42 Cal. 2d 448 · California Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1954

Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 19 Cal.2d 181, 188 [ 120 P.2d 1 ].) As was said in Smulson v. … Brown, 97 Cal.App.2d 361, 364 [ 217 P.2d 995 ]) or to introduce evidence in the light of an ambiguous or confused admission (Martin v. Miqueu, 37 Cal. App.2d 133, 135-136 [ 98 P.2d 816 ]) are not in point.

Rible v. Hughes

24 Cal. 2d 437 · California Supreme Court · Jul 5, 1944

Board of Trustees, supra; Fry v. Board of Education, supra; Abraham v. Sims, supra; Fidler v. Board of Trustees, supra.) … Board of Educ., supra; Kacsur v. Board of Trustees, *448 supra.)

Stone v. Alameda Health System

California Supreme Court · Aug 15, 2024

(See Mayrhofer v. Board of Education (1891) 89 Cal. 110, 113 (Mayrhofer).) Multiple decisions have applied the rule to interpretations of the Labor Code. (See, e.g., Allen v. … Brown Act, setting the requirements for open meetings of local agencies. 40  STONE v. ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM Opinion of the Court by Corrigan, J.

Fracasse v. Brent

6 Cal. 3d 784 · California Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1972

(Brown v. … (See Jones v. Brown, 84 Cal.App.2d 390 [ 190 P.2d 956 ].)

Carlin v. Superior Court

13 Cal. 4th 1104 · California Supreme Court · Aug 30, 1996

(Id. at p. 1000; see Brown v. Superior Court (1988) 44 Cal.3d 1049 [ 245 Cal.Rptr. 412 , 751 P.2d 470 ] (hereafter Brown.) … (See, e.g., Brown, supra, 44 Cal.3d at pp. 1061-1062; Stevens v.

Wulzen v. Bd. of Supervisors of City & Cty of San Francisco

101 Cal. 15 · California Supreme Court · Jan 3, 1894

Oakland Board of Education, 54 Cal. 375 ; Myers v. Hamilton, 60 Cal. 289 ; Williams v. Supervisors of Sacramento County, 65 Cal. 160 ; Bixler v. Supervisors of Sacramento County, 59 Cal. 698 ; People ex rel McDonald v. … (People v. Supervisors, 8 Cal. 60; People v. Provines, 34 Cal. 532 ; Kimball v. Supervisors, 46 Cal. 19 .)

In Re Shaputis

53 Cal. 4th 192 · California Supreme Court · Dec 29, 2011

Jackson v. Virginia (1979) 443 U.S. 307, 318–320; People v. Johnson (1980) 26 Cal.3d 557, 578.) … (see, e.g., People v.

McClearen v. Superior Court

45 Cal. 2d 852 · California Supreme Court · Dec 29, 1955

(Bowles v. Superior Court, 44 Cal.2d 574, 582 [ 283 P.2d 704 ] ; Braun v. Brown, 13 Cal.2d 130, 133 [ 87 P.2d 1009 ] ; Dollenmayer v. … Corp. v. City of Los Angeles, 38 Cal.2d 623, 626 [ 241 P.2d 985 ]; Isenberg v. Sherman, 214 Cal. 722, 725 [ 7 P.2d 1006 ].)

County of Alameda v. Janssen

16 Cal. 2d 276 · California Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1940

R. 1029] ; Veterans’ Welfare Board v. Riley, 188 Cal. 607 [ 206 Pac. 631 ].) … (MacMillan v. Clarke, 184 Cal. 491 [ 194 Pac. 1030 , 17 A. L. R 288] [free school text books]; Veterans’ Welfare Board v.

In Re Daedler

194 Cal. 320 · California Supreme Court · Aug 13, 1924

Olsen v. Brown, 50 Minn. 353 . [ 36 Am. St. Rep. 651 , 16 L. R. A. 691, 52 N. W. 935 ], the *331 supreme court of that state, in commenting upon the case of People v. Turner, 55 Ill. 281 [ 8 Am. … In the case of Mill v. Brown, 31 Utah, 473 [ 120 Am. St.

Lybarger v. City of Los Angeles

40 Cal. 3d 822 · California Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1985

Brown and Linda K. Lefkowitz, Deputy City Attorneys, for Defendant and Respondent. OPINION LUCAS, J. … (See Slochower v. Board of Education (1956) 350 U.S. 551 [ 100 L.Ed. 692 , 76 S.Ct. 637 ]; Bogacki v. Board of Supervisors (1971) 5 Cal.3d 771, 784-807 [ 97 Cal.

Parker v. Bowron

40 Cal. 2d 344 · California Supreme Court · Mar 6, 1953

Workman, 6 Cal.App. 633 [ 92 P. 742 ] ; Brown v. Superior Court, 10 Cal.App.2d 365 [ 52 P.2d 256 ] ; Charles L. Donohoe Co. v. Superior Court, 79 Cal.App. 41 [ 248 P. 1007 ] ; Friedland v. … Proc., § 956; Brown v. Superior Court, 34 Cal.2d 559, 562 [ 212 P.2d 878 ] ; see McClatchy Newspapers v.

Graham v. Mayor & Bd. of Trs. of Fresno

151 Cal. 465 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1907

(People v. Cobb, 133 Cal. 74 , [ 65 Pac. 325 ] ; People v. Sands, 102 Cal. 12 , [ 36 Pac. 404 ] ; Coggins v. City of Sacramento, 59 Cal. 599 ; Jenks v. Council, 58 Cal. 576 ; Bishop v. Council, 58 Cal. 572.) … (Conlin v. Board of Supervisors, 114 Cal. 404 , [ 46 Pac. 279 ].)

Hemenway v. Thaxter

150 Cal. 737 · California Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1907

Brown and the deed from Mrs. Brown to Mrs. … The rule laid down in Horn v. Volcano Water Co., 13 Cal. 62 , [ 73 Am. Dec. 569 ],-approved in Banning v.

Edelstein v. City & County of San Francisco

29 Cal. 4th 164 · California Supreme Court · Nov 7, 2002

Opinion BROWN, J. … Brown (1974) 415 U.S. 724, 737, fn. 8 [ 39 L.Ed.2d 714, 727 , 94 S.Ct. 1274 ].)” (Libertarian Party v. Eu (1980) 28 Cal.3d 535, 539-540 [ 170 Cal.Rptr. 25 , 620 P.2d 612 ].)

People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Russell

48 Cal. 2d 189 · California Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1957

“In support of its contentions appellant cites Rose v. State, supra; Beckham v. City of Stockton, 64 Cal.App.2d 487 [ 149 P.2d 296 ]; McDonald v. State, 130 Cal.App.2d 793 [ 279 P.2d 777 ] ; Brown v. … Board of Supervisors, 124 Cal. 274 [ 57 P. 82 ], and Bigley v. Nunan, 53 Cal. 403 . “All of the cited cases are distinguishable from the case now before us.

Fairchild v. Bd. of Educ. of San Francisco

107 Cal. 92 · California Supreme Court · Apr 5, 1895

Under this state of facts it is apparent that the case is parallel in its essential features with Kennedy v. Board of Education, 82 Cal. 483 . … The board of education in regulating vacations could pass no rules in contravention of the statutory provisions.

Byrne v. Byrne

94 Cal. 576 · California Supreme Court · May 25, 1892

(Eastman v. Wright, 6 Pick. 316 .) In Brown v. … v.

Browne v. Superior Court

16 Cal. 2d 593 · California Supreme Court · Nov 12, 1940

Browne in San Francisco. No appeal was taken from either order. On April 7, 1939, Harold V. Daley, the attorney who had represented J. W. … (France v. Superior Court, 201 Cal. 122 [ 255 Pac. 815 , 52 A. L. R. 869]; Bartlett v. Superior Court, 108 Cal. App. 755 [ 292 Pac. 545 ] ; 29 C. J., 116; 12 R. C. L. 1218.)