Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscal

10,000+ results

2.91s

  • Keidatz v. Albany

    39 Cal. 2d 826 · California Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1952

    Board of Medical Examiners, 93 Cal.App. 65, 71 [ 268 P. 1073 ] ; Takekawa v. Hole, 17 Cal.App. 653, 656 [ 121 P. 296 ] ; see See v. Joughin, 18 Cal.2d 603, 606 [ 116 P.2d 777 ] ; Campenella v. … (Herdan v. Hanson, 182 Cal. 538, 542 [ 189 P. 440 ] ; Estate of Sharon, 179 Cal. 447, 461 [ 177 P. 283 ] ; City & County of San Francisco v. Brown, 153 Cal. 644, 648 [ 96 P. 281 ].)

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • Montgomery v. Meyerstein

    186 Cal. 459 · California Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1921

    (McLeod v. Moran, 153 Cal. 100 , [ 94 Pac. 604 ].) … (Spreckels v. Gorrill, 152 Cal. 389 , [ 92 Pac. 1011 ]; Davis v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • In Re Ronald E.

    19 Cal. 3d 315 · California Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1977

    board. … {Bunnell v.

    Abrogated on other grounds by People v. Howard, 1 Cal. 4th 1132 (1992)Cited 117 timesPublished
  • Stockett v. Association of California Water Agencies Joint Powers Insurance Authority

    20 Cal. Rptr. 3d 176 · California Supreme Court · Nov 1, 2004

    Section 910 .. . until a written claim therefor has been presented to the public entity and has been acted upon by the board, or has been deemed to have been rejected by the board . . . .” … Board of Education (1990) 217 Cal.App.3d 303, 311 [ 266 Cal.Rptr. 1 ], disapproved on other grounds in Caldwell v.

    Cited 104 timesPublished
  • People v. Seitz

    209 Cal. 199 · California Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1930

    App. 305 [ 210 Pac. 632 ], and of People v. Thal, 61 Cal. App. 48 [ 214 Pac. 296 ]. … Brown had planned paying a visit to Mrs.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Rible v. Hughes

    24 Cal. 2d 437 · California Supreme Court · Jul 5, 1944

    Board of Trustees, supra; Fry v. Board of Education, supra; Abraham v. Sims, supra; Fidler v. Board of Trustees, supra.) … Board of Educ., supra; Kacsur v. Board of Trustees, *448 supra.)

    Cited 53 timesPublished
  • Keener v. Jeld-Wen, Inc.

    46 Cal. 4th 247 · California Supreme Court · May 7, 2009

    (People v. … Mizel v.

    Cited 160 timesPublished
  • Ebersol v. Cowan

    35 Cal. 3d 427 · California Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1983

    . ; Muskopf v. Corning Hospital Dist. (1961) 55 Cal.2d 211, 213-217 [ 11 Cal. Rptr. 89 , 359 P.2d 457 ]; Malloy v. Fong (1951) 37 Cal.2d 356, 364-367 [ 232 P.2d 241 ]) and constitutional doctrines (see, e.g., Brown v. … See also Flores v. Board of Supervisors (1970) 13 Cal. App.3d 480 [ 91 Cal.

    Cited 57 timesPublished
  • Committee for Green Foothills v. Santa Clara County Bd. of Supervisors

    48 Cal. 4th 32 · California Supreme Court · Feb 11, 2010

    Miller Brown & Dannis, Mark W. … of Supervisors v.

    Cited 206 timesPublished
  • United Teachers v. Los Angeles Unified School District

    54 Cal. 4th 504 · California Supreme Court · Jun 28, 2012

    Relying upon Board of Education v. … (United Steelworkers of America v. Board of Education, supra, 162 Cal.App.3d 823; Fontana, supra, 201 Cal.App.3d 1517.)

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Wakelee v. Goodrum

    1 Cal. Unrep. 364 · California Supreme Court · Oct 12, 1868

    The action is to recover possession of a lot situated on the corner of Twelfth (formerly Brown) and Howard streets, San Francisco. … The acts shown certainly do not bring the ease within the definition of actual possession adopted in Wolf v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Crowther v. Rowlandson

    27 Cal. 376 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1865

    {Bond v. Bond, 7 Allen, 1 .) … On that day, the plaintiff embarked for New York on board the steamer Sonora.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • In Re Shaputis

    53 Cal. 4th 192 · California Supreme Court · Dec 29, 2011

    Jackson v. Virginia (1979) 443 U.S. 307, 318–320; People v. Johnson (1980) 26 Cal.3d 557, 578.) … (see, e.g., People v.

    Cited 99 timesPublished
  • Browning v. McNear

    158 Cal. 525 · California Supreme Court · Oct 20, 1910

    Browning? “A. Mr. Browning delivered the yard receipts. “Q. It is a fact that you did accept those receipts? “A. I took them, yes, and accepted them.” … (Whitton v. Sullivan, 96 Cal. 480 , [ 31 Pac. 1115 ] ; Stockton Combined Harvester Works v. Glenn Falls Ins. Co., 98 Cal. 557 , [ 33 Pac. 633 ] ; Ruggles v. Am. Central Ins. Co., 114 N. Y. 415 , [ 11 Am. St.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Natarajan v. Dignity Health

    11 Cal. 5th 1095 · California Supreme Court · Aug 12, 2021

    Board of Directors (1980) 104 Cal.App.3d 648, 657 (Applebaum).) … (Id. at p. 1028, citing, inter alia, Brown v. Vance (5th Cir. 1981) 637 F.2d 272, 274.)

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Fracasse v. Brent

    6 Cal. 3d 784 · California Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1972

    (Brown v. … (See Jones v. Brown, 84 Cal.App.2d 390 [ 190 P.2d 956 ].)

    Declined to follow by Blank v. Borden, 11 Cal. 3d 963 (1974)Cited 232 timesPublished
  • Independent Progressive Party v. County Clerks

    31 Cal. 2d 549 · California Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1948

    (Britton v. Board of Commrs., supra [ 129 Cal. 337 ( 61 P. 1115 , 51 L.R.A. 115 )] ; Eaton v. Brown, 96 Cal. 371, 373 [ 31 P. 250 , 31 Am. St.Rep. 225, 17 L.R.A. 697 ].) … The deprivation of the right of selection is a deprivation of the right of franchise. ’ (Britton v. Board of Commrs., supra, p. 344; cf. People v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • McClearen v. Superior Court

    45 Cal. 2d 852 · California Supreme Court · Dec 29, 1955

    (Bowles v. Superior Court, 44 Cal.2d 574, 582 [ 283 P.2d 704 ] ; Braun v. Brown, 13 Cal.2d 130, 133 [ 87 P.2d 1009 ] ; Dollenmayer v. … Corp. v. City of Los Angeles, 38 Cal.2d 623, 626 [ 241 P.2d 985 ]; Isenberg v. Sherman, 214 Cal. 722, 725 [ 7 P.2d 1006 ].)

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Wolf v. Bd. of Supervisors of Santa Clara Cty.

    150 Cal. 285 · California Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1907

    The prayer of the complaint is that the board “be enjoined and forbidden from passing any ordinance or ordinances granting said'petitions for franchises privileges to the said George T. … In Conover v. Ruckman, 33 N. J. Eq. 303, the vice-chancellor had “of his own motion” dissolved a preliminary injunction, and the plaintiff had appealed.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Schatz v. Allen Matkins Leck Gamble & Mallory LLP

    45 Cal. 4th 557 · California Supreme Court · Jan 26, 2009

    In Aguilar v. … Rounds Co. v.

    Cited 45 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.