Case law

Irvine Co. v. McColgan

26 Cal. 2d 160 · California Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1945

Staple Cotton Cooperative Assn., 142 Miss. 312, 331 [ 107 So. 2]; Brown v. Staple Cotton Cooperative Assn., 132 Miss. 859, 889 [ 96 So. 849 ]; Cole-McIntyre-Norfleet Co. v. … Board of Com’rs of Sedgwick County, 119 Kan. 877 [ 241 P. 466 ]; Oregon Growers Cooperative Assn. v.

In re Vicks

56 Cal. 4th 274 · California Supreme Court · Mar 4, 2013

(Gilman v. Brown (E.D.Cal., Sept. 7, 2012, No. CIV. S-05-830 LKK/GGH) 2012 U.S.Dist. Lexis 127679.) … (See Collins v.

King v. Dugan

150 Cal. 258 · California Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1907

(See Hoppough v. Struble, 60 N. Y. 430 ; Walker v. Brem, 67 Cal. 600 , [ 8 Pac. 320 ]; Mecker v. Dalton, 75 Cal. 154, 158 , [ 16 Pac. 764 ].) … Quoting from Hoppough v. Struble, 60 N.

California Redevelopment Ass'n v. Matosantos

53 Cal. 4th 231 · California Supreme Court · Dec 29, 2011

.”]; see also Modern Barber Col. v. Cal. Emp. Stab. Com. (1948) 31 Cal.2d 720, 731 [ 192 P.2d 916 ]; Standard Oil Co. v. State Board of Equal. (1936) 6 Cal.2d 557, 562 [ 59 P.2d 119 ]; Lemen v. … (Board of Supervisors v. Local Agency Formation Com. (1992) 3 Cal.4th 903, 914 [ 13 Cal.Rptr.2d 245 , 838 P.2d 1198 ]; see also City of El Monte v.

Arcadia Unified School District v. State Department of Education

2 Cal. 4th 251 · California Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1992

March 16, 1992. *254 COUNSEL Breon, O'Donnell, Miller, Brown & Dannis, Priscilla Brown, Nancy B. Bourne and Martha Buell Scott for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Joseph R. Symkovick, Roger D. … Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 180-181 [ 172 Cal.

McIntyre v. Hauser

131 Cal. 11 · California Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1900

It is elementary that an assignment of a chose in action takes precedence over a subsequent garnishment (Walling v. … Neither is the conclusion to which we have arrived opposed to the decision in Maier v. Freeman, 112 Cal. 8 . 1 The facts of the two cases are widely variant.

Sierra Club v. San Joaquin Local Agency Formation Commission

87 Cal. Rptr. 2d 702 · California Supreme Court · Aug 19, 1999

In Alexander v. … (Clark v. State Personnel Board (1943) 61 Cal.App.2d 800 [ 144 P.2d 84 ]; Child v. State Personnel Board (1950) 97 Cal.App.2d 467 [ 218 P.2d 52 ].)

Malloy v. Bd. of Educ. of City of San Jose

102 Cal. 642 · California Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1894

The charter of the city of San Jose provides that the board of education of the city shall consist of eight members, and that “ a majority of the board shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business, but any smaller … duty of the board to declare her elected as a teacher in the said schools, and averred that the board never employed her as a teacher.

Lockard v. City of Los Angeles

33 Cal. 2d 453 · California Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1949

(Miller v. Board of Public Works, 195 Cal. 477, 495 [ 234 P. 381 , 38 A.L.R. 1479 ]; Brown v. City of Los Angeles, 183 Cal. 783, 789 [ 192 P. 716 ].) … (See Miller v. Board of Public Works, 195 Cal. 477, 484, 488 [ 234 P. 381 , 38 A.L.R. 1479 ].)

Tupper v. Superior Court

51 Cal. 2d 263 · California Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1958

(Board of Trustees v. State Bd. of Equalization, 1 Cal.2d 784, 787 [ 37 P.2d 84 , 96 A.L.R. 775 ]; Caminetti v. Superior Court, 16 Cal.2d 838, 848 [ 108 P.2d 911 ]; Verdier v. … Board of Directors, 34 Cal.2d 125, 138 [ 208 P.2d 661 ]; Williams v. Stockton, 195 Cal. 743 [ 235 P. 986 ]; McClatchy Newspapers v. Superior Court, 26 Cal.2d 386, 394 [ 159 P.2d 944 ]; Brown v.

People v. Gary W.

5 Cal. 3d 296 · California Supreme Court · Jul 7, 1971

Thompson (1969) 394 U.S. 618 [ 22 L.Ed.2d 600 , 89 S.Ct. 1322 ]), and education (Brown v. … In Joe Z. v.

In Re Waters of Long Valley Creek Stream System

25 Cal. 3d 339 · California Supreme Court · Sep 14, 1979

Chow v. … (See also Brown v.

Board of Health of the Marine Hospital ex rel. State v. The Pacific Mail S. S. Co.

1 Cal. 197 · California Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1850

Section 11 makes it the duty of the Board of Health to require the owners or consignees of such vessel to give a several bond to the state in a penalty of two hundred dollars for each person included in such report; and section … The action is brought under the 11th section to recover a penalty for the neglect of the defendants to give the bond, which the Board of Health is authorized thereby to require, and judgment was rendered by the court below

People v. Smith

7 Cal. 3d 282 · California Supreme Court · May 23, 1972

We recently reviewed the facts of those cases in Horack v. Superior Court (1970) 3 Cal.3d 720, 725 [ 91 Cal.Rptr. 569 , 478 P.2d 1 ]: “in People v. … (Katz v. United States (1967) 389 U.S. 347, 357 [ 19 L.Ed.2d 576, 585 , 88 S.Ct. 507 ]; accord, Vate v. Louisiana (1970) 399 U.S. 30, 34 [ 26 L.Ed.2d 409, 413 , 90 S.Ct. 1969 ]; Camara v.

Beresford v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

45 Cal. 2d 738 · California Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1955

Co. v. Pacific Gas & Elec. … Defendant asserts *747 that Brown was plaintiffs’ agent and that the cross-examinatian of Brown as to his knowledge concerning the hazardous tree which fell was material and relevant to the question of plaintiffs’ contributory

People v. Brasure

71 Cal. Rptr. 3d 675 · California Supreme Court · Feb 7, 2008

in Brown misled the jurors as to the scope of their sentencing discretion or responsibility. ( People v. … of the body at the scene where it was found, and People's exhibit 8, a board displaying eight autopsy photographs.

Elston v. City of Turlock

38 Cal. 3d 227 · California Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1985

. *234 739, 743-744 [ 297 P. 25 ]; Flores v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 13 Cal.App.3d at p. 483.) … (Ibid.; see, e.g., Brill v. Fox, supra, 211 Cal. at p. 744 ; Waite v. Southern Pacific Co., supra, 192 Cal. at p. 471 ; cf. Flores v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 13 Cal.App.3d at p. 485.)

Ameron Internat. Corp. v. Insurance Co. of State of Pennsylvania

50 Cal. 4th 1370 · California Supreme Court · Nov 18, 2010

Andrea for Defendants and Respondents International Insurance Company and Puritan Insurance Company. *1374 Burnham Brown, Thomas M. Downey, Tyler G. Olpin and James Y. … Co. v.

People v. Whitson

25 Cal. 2d 593 · California Supreme Court · Dec 29, 1944

Brigance was wearing khaki clothes, and a brown leather jacket and she did not believe he was wearing a hat. … (People v. Foster, 198 Cal. 112 [ 243 P. 667 ] ; People v. Jori, 99 Cal.App. 280, 283 [ 278 P. 250 ]; People v. Tracy, 18 Cal.App.2d 444, 446 [ 64 P.2d 166 ]; People v.

People v. Feggans

67 Cal. 2d 444 · California Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1967

Relying on Eskridge v. Washington Prison Board, 357 U.S. 214 [ 2 L.Ed.2d 1269 , 78 S.Ct. 1061 ], and Lame v. … Brown, 372 U.S. 477 [ 9 L.Ed.2d 892 , 83 S.Ct. 768 ], the court concluded that the no-merit letter procedure unconstitutionally conditioned an indigent’s right of appeal (see Douglas v.