Case law

Estate of Johnston

47 Cal. 2d 265 · California Supreme Court · Nov 2, 1956

’s Estate v. … In Schwan v.

Bighorn-Desert View Water Agency v. Verjil

46 Cal. Rptr. 3d 73 · California Supreme Court · Jul 24, 2006

(City of Huntington Beach v. Board of Administration (1992) 4 Cal.4th 462, 468 [ 14 Cal.Rptr.2d 514 , 841 P.2d 1034 ]; see also Cooley v. … (See Rossi v. Brown (1995) 9 Cal.4th 688, 697 [ 38 Cal.Rptr.2d 363 , 889 P.2d 557 ].) But the state Constitution imposes no similar limitation on the initiative.

Griffith Co. v. San Diego College for Women

45 Cal. 2d 501 · California Supreme Court · Nov 10, 1955

Kelly Co. v. United States (Ct.Cl., 1947), 69 F.Supp. 117, 118 . “As a matter of fact Chairman of the Board concludes that the execution of 52 Change Orders caused some delay. … (Gerdetz v. Central Oregon Irr. Co., 83 Ore. 576, 580 [ 163 P. 980 ] ; Everett v. Brown, 120 Misc. 349 [ 198 N.Y.S. 462 , 465] ; Koepke v. E. Liethen Grain Co., 205 Wis. 75, 80 [ 236 N.W. 544 ].)

Estate of Roach

139 Cal. 17 · California Supreme Court · Apr 3, 1903

Brown was duly appointed administrator with the will annexed. … In Abila v.

State Bar of California v. Superior Court

207 Cal. 323 · California Supreme Court · May 31, 1929

(See, also, Melvin v. State, 121 Cal. 16 [ 53 Pac. 416 ] ; People v. San Joaquin Valley Assn., 151 Cal. 797 [ 91 Pac. 740 ].) … Ann. 19 , Brown v. Grover, 6 Bush (Ky.), 1 , Page v. Hardin, 8 B. Mon. (Ky.) 648, and Mechem on Public Officers, section 457.

Arnett v. Dal Cielo

14 Cal. 4th 4 · California Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1996

(Smith v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance (1988) 202 Cal.App.3d 316, 322-324 [ 248 Cal.Rptr. 704 ] [Bus. & Prof. Code, § 2292]; Alexander D. v. … J., Kennard, J., Baxter, J., Werdegar, J., Chin, J., and Brown, J., concurred.

Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC

59 Cal. 4th 348 · California Supreme Court · Jun 23, 2014

Horton, Inc. v. NLRB (5th Cir. 2013) 737 F.3d 344 (Horton II).) We consider below the Board’s position and the Fifth Circuit’s reasons for rejecting it. A. … (Brown v. Ralphs Grocery Co. (2011) 197 Cal.App.4th 489, 502 [ 128 Cal.Rptr.3d 854 ], fn. omitted.)

Slawinski v. Mocettini

63 Cal. 2d 70 · California Supreme Court · Jun 28, 1965

(Pacific Home v. County of Los Angeles, 41 Cal.2d 855, 857 [ 264 P.2d 544 ]; see also Millsap v. Hooper, 34 Cal.2d 192 [ 208 P.2d 982 ] ; Jablon v. Henneberger, 33 Cal.2d 773 [ 205 P.2d 1 ]; cf. Lee v. … (Koehn v. State Board of Equalization, 50 Cal.2d 432, 435 [ 326 P.2d 502 ] ; Marshallan Mfg. Co. v. Brack, 172 Cal.App.2d 22, 23 [ 342 P.2d 26 ] ; Brown v. Guy, 167 Cal.App.2d 211, 215 [ 334 P.2d 67 ] ; Haskins v.

McFadden v. Jordan

32 Cal. 2d 330 · California Supreme Court · Aug 3, 1948

In Livermore v. … To support their argument intervenors rely upon Wright v. Jordan (1923), 192 Cal. 704, 711 [ 221 P. 915 ]; Epperson v. Jordan (1938), 12 Cal.2d 61, 68-69 [ 82 P.2d 445 ]; and Brown v.

Cal. N. R.R. v. Bd. of Supervisors of Butte Cty.

18 Cal. 671 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1861

We think the Board of Supervisors act ministerially in the issuance of bonds. (See McCauley v. Brooks, 16 Cal.) … It is that this proceeding was begun before ten days had elapsed from the decision of the Board of Supervisors— a remonstrance having been made by a tax-payer, as provided by the second section of the act.

People v. Mincey

2 Cal. 4th 408 · California Supreme Court · Apr 6, 1992

Defendant insisted that Sandra B. had done the beatings, and again denied any knowledge of the board. (3) Third interview On December 26, 1983, Officer Powell and Detective Larry Brown had a third interview with defendant … (People v. Burton, supra, 48 Cal.3d at p. 864; People v. Brown (1988) 46 Cal.3d 432, 448 [ 250 Cal.Rptr. 604 , 758 P.2d 1135 ].) M.

People v. Dickey

28 Cal. Rptr. 3d 647 · California Supreme Court · May 23, 2005

Opinion BROWN, J. … (People v. Brown (2004) 33 Cal.4th 382, 401 [ 15 Cal.Rptr.3d 624 , 93 P.3d 244 ] (Brown); Prieto, supra, 30 Cal.4th at p. 276.)

Kish v. California State Automobile Ass'n

190 Cal. 246 · California Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1922

A. 475, 29 Pac. 234]; Brown v. Chevrolet Motor Car Co., 39 Cal. App. 738 [ 179 Pac. 697 ]; Berry on Automobiles, sec. 684.) … (Hall v. Puente Oil Co., 47 Cal. App. 611 [ 191 Pac. 39 ]; Lessen v. Peterson, Nelson & Co., 18 Cal. App. 349 [ 123 Pac. 219 ].) The test, as laid down in Chamberlain v.

Middleton v. Imperial Insurance

34 Cal. 3d 134 · California Supreme Court · Jul 14, 1983

Proc., § 340.5), but, as appellants correctly assert, the four-year period is not a reasonable cut-off date, since the statute of limitations can be extended or tolled for various reasons. 7 (See, e.g., Brown v. … State Board of Control (1976) 69 Cal.App.3d 502 [ 137 Cal.Rptr. 199 ]; Lucas v. Board of Trustees (1971) 18 Cal.App.3d 988 [ 96 Cal. Rptr. 431 ]; Driscoll v. City of Los Angeles (1967) 67 Cal.2d 297 [ 61 Cal.

Lelande v. Lowery

26 Cal. 2d 224 · California Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1945

Lampton (1935), 4 Cal.2d 697, 703 [ 53 P.2d 147 ]; Brown v. Ferdon *227 (1936), 5 Cal.2d 226, 230 [ 54 P.2d 712 ]; Fernelius v. Pierce (1943) , 22 Cal.2d 226, 243 [ 138 P.2d 12 ]; Baugh v. … (State v. Defiance County (1894), 1 Ohio Dec. 584 [32 Ohio L.J. 88] ; State ex rel. Woare v. Board of Commrs. (1924), 70 Mont. 252, 275 [ 225 P. 389 ].)

In Re Prather

50 Cal. 4th 238 · California Supreme Court · Jul 29, 2010

(See Hornung v. … (See Tripp v.

Estate of Caldwell

216 Cal. 694 · California Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1932

(Stow v. Superior Court, 178 Cal. 140, 144 [ 172 Pac. 598 ]; Houghton v. … Proc.; Bond v. United R. R. Co., 169 Cal. 273 [ 146 Pac. 688 ]; Tupman v. Haberkern, 208 Cal. 256 [ 280 Pac. 970 ].)

City & County of San Francisco v. Superior Court

38 Cal. 2d 156 · California Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1951

Brown, Attorneys General, Hartwell H. Linney, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Wilmer W. Morse and James E. … (Evans v. Superior Court, 14 Cal.2d 563 , 579- 581 [ 96 P.2d 107 ] and cases cited; Abelleira v. District Court of Appeal, 17 Cal.2d 280, 290-291 [ 109 P.2d 942 , 132 A.L.R. 715 ].) In Franchise Tax Board v.

Rittersbacher v. Bd. of Supervisors of L.A. Cty.

220 Cal. 535 · California Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1934

(Wells Fargo & Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 56 Cal. 194, 196 .) … Dist. v.

Sander v. State Bar of Cal.

58 Cal. 4th 300 · California Supreme Court · Dec 19, 2013

(Coldwell v. Board of Public Works, supra, 187 Cal. at p. 518; accord, City Council v. … v.