Case law

Department of Finance v. Commission on State Mandates

134 Cal. Rptr. 2d 237 · California Supreme Court · May 22, 2003

Brown Act (Brown Act) (Gov. Code, § 54950.5 et seq.) … Brown Act. ...

Arnett v. Dal Cielo

14 Cal. 4th 4 · California Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1996

(Smith v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance (1988) 202 Cal.App.3d 316, 322-324 [ 248 Cal.Rptr. 704 ] [Bus. & Prof. Code, § 2292]; Alexander D. v. … J., Kennard, J., Baxter, J., Werdegar, J., Chin, J., and Brown, J., concurred.

Lungren v. Deukmejian

45 Cal. 3d 727 · California Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1988

(McCoy v. Board of Supervisors (1941) 18 Cal.2d 193, 196 [ 114 P.2d 569 ].) … Brown (1982) 32 Cal.3d 236, 248 [ 186 Cal.Rptr. 30 , 651 P.2d 274 ]; White v.

People v. Cole

44 Cal. Rptr. 3d 261 · California Supreme Court · Jun 12, 2006

(Bonnell v. Medical Board (2003) 31 Cal.4th 1255, 1265 [ 8 Cal.Rptr.3d 532 , 82 P.3d 740 ].) … Board of Dental Exam. (1932) 216 Cal. 285, 299 [ 14 P.2d 67 ] (Painless Parker).) Ultimately, the interpretation of a statute is a question of law for the courts to decide. 19 (Reno v.

Anaheim Union Water Co. v. Parker

101 Cal. 483 · California Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1894

(See, also, Potter v. Trustees, 11 Bradw. 280; School District v. McDonald, 39 Iowa, 564 .) In Board of Education v. Fonda, 77 N. … Gardiner handed him a piece of brown paper containing memoranda showing the several items which went to make up the $1,152.40 mentioned in the receipt.

Estate of Roach

139 Cal. 17 · California Supreme Court · Apr 3, 1903

Brown was duly appointed administrator with the will annexed. … In Abila v.

Senate of the State of Cal. v. Jones

90 Cal. Rptr. 2d 810 · California Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1999

Co. v. Deukmejian (1989) 48 Cal.3d 805 [ 258 Cal.Rptr. 161 , 771 P.2d 1247 ]; Brosnahan v. Brown (1982) 32 Cal.3d 236 [ 186 Cal.Rptr. 30 , 651 P.2d 274 ]; Fair Political Practices Com. v. … Brown, supra, 32 Cal.3d 236, 245 .)

Wilson v. Eu

1 Cal. 4th 707 · California Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1992

Brown, retired Presiding Justice of the Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District, the Honorable Rafael H. … .]; Wygant v. Jackson Board of Education (1986) 476 U.S. 267, 291 [ 90 L.Ed.2d 260, 279-280 , 106 S.Ct. 1842 ] [conc. opn. of O’Connor, J.]; Fullilove v.

Miller v. Department of Corrections

30 Cal. Rptr. 3d 797 · California Supreme Court · Jul 18, 2005

In Proksel v. … (Flait v.

Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC

59 Cal. 4th 348 · California Supreme Court · Jun 23, 2014

Horton, Inc. v. NLRB (5th Cir. 2013) 737 F.3d 344 (Horton II).) We consider below the Board’s position and the Fifth Circuit’s reasons for rejecting it. A. … (Brown v. Ralphs Grocery Co. (2011) 197 Cal.App.4th 489, 502 [ 128 Cal.Rptr.3d 854 ], fn. omitted.)

Bourn v. Hart

93 Cal. 321 · California Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1892

In the case of Stevenson v. … In the case of Clodfelter v. State, 86 N. C. 51 , 41 Am.

People v. Bouchard

49 Cal. 2d 438 · California Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1957

(United States of Mexico v. Rask, 109 Cal.App. 497, 500-502 [ 293 P. 108 ]; see Parkside Realty Co. v. MacDonald, 167 Cal. 342, 346 [ 139 P. 805 ]; Board of Commrs. v. Younger, 29 Cal. 147, 149 [87 Am.Dec. 164]; cf. … Curry, 47 U.S. (6 How.) 106, 111-112 [ 12 L.Ed. 363 ] [citation to appellees to appear on appeal]; Henderson v. Richardson Co., 25 F.2d 225, 226 [same]; see Brown v. Arnold, 131 F. 723, 725-726 [ 67 C.C.A. 125 ]; cf.

Fukuda v. City of Angels

85 Cal. Rptr. 2d 696 · California Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1999

State Board of Equal. (1936) 6 Cal.2d 557 [ 59 P.2d 119 ]; Whitten v. … (Covert v. State Board of Equalization (1946) 29 Cal.2d 125, 131-132 [ 173 P.2d 545 ].)

In Re Seaton

17 Cal. Rptr. 3d 633 · California Supreme Court · Sep 29, 2004

The advertisement sought public support in a contract dispute with the Riverside County Board of Supervisors, and it implied that the board's refusal to agree to the salary increase sought would undermine the prosecution … Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by BROWN, J.

People v. Dickey

28 Cal. Rptr. 3d 647 · California Supreme Court · May 23, 2005

Opinion BROWN, J. … (People v. Brown (2004) 33 Cal.4th 382, 401 [ 15 Cal.Rptr.3d 624 , 93 P.3d 244 ] (Brown); Prieto, supra, 30 Cal.4th at p. 276.)

McAulay v. Bd. of Supervisors of Merced

178 Cal. 628 · California Supreme Court · Aug 1, 1918

approved March 31,1897, and acts amendatory thereof and supplementary thereto, may effectively withdraw from the petition for the organization of such district at any time prior to the presentation of the petition to the board … of supervisors on the date fixed in the published notice for such presentation, with the result that at the time of -such presentation they caff no longer be considered by the board as petitioners.

Reynolds Metals Co. v. Alperson

25 Cal. 3d 124 · California Supreme Court · Aug 31, 1979

Proc., § 1021; D’Amico v. Board of Medical Examiners (1974) 11 Cal.3d 1, 24-27 [ 112 Cal.Rptr. 786 , 520 P.2d 10 ]; Freeman v. Goldberg (1961) 55 Cal.2d 622, 625 [12 *128 Cal.Rptr. 668, 361 P.2d 244 ]; Young v. … Browne (1972) 27 Cal.App.3d 386, 398-399 [ 103 Cal.Rptr. 775 ] and Sain v. Silvestre (1978) 78 Cal.App.3d 461, 476 [ 144 Cal.Rptr. 478 ] are disapproved insofar as they are inconsistent with our holding here.

Mann v. Cracchiolo

38 Cal. 3d 18 · California Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1985

In Brown v. … (Brown v. Colm, supra, 11 Cal.3d 639, 647 .) As a diplómate of surgery and neurosurgery, Dr.

McAulay v. Bd. of Supervisors of Merced

178 Cal. 628 · California Supreme Court · Aug 1, 1918

approved March 31,1897, and acts amendatory thereof and supplementary thereto, may effectively withdraw from the petition for the organization of such district at any time prior to the presentation of the petition to the board … of supervisors on the date fixed in the published notice for such presentation, with the result that at the time of -such presentation they caff no longer be considered by the board as petitioners.

Loeffler v. Target Corporation

58 Cal. 4th 1081 · California Supreme Court · May 1, 2014

The Board opposed this exemption. (See Sen. Democratic Caucus, 3d reading analysis of Assem. Bill No. 2619, as amended Aug. 17, 1982, p. 2; see also Board’s letter to Gov. Edmund G. Brown re Assem. … Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Frances T.