Case law

People ex rel. Board of State Harbor Commissioners v. Central Wharf Joint Stock Co.

1 Cal. Unrep. 319 · California Supreme Court · Oct 8, 1866

Anderson v. Anderson

214 Cal. 414 · California Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1931

In the months of November and December, 1925, the mother had engaged in sexual intercourse with one Pete *416 Brown. … (Wright v. Hicks, 17 Ga. 160 [ 60 Am. Dec. 687 ].) "While it may be said that the authorities as to the degree of proof in such a case are in conflict (Jackson v. Thornton, 133 Tenn. 36 [ 179 S.

Ex parte Whitwell

19 L.R.A. 727 · California Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1893

(Tiedeman’s Limitation of Police Power, secs. 85, 194; Slate v. Jersey City, 47 N. J. L. 286; Commonw. v. Robertson, 5 Cush. 438 ; Austin, v. Murray, 16 Pick. 121 .) … (Matter of Colah, 3 Daly, 529 ; Brown on Insanity, sec. 6.)

Leone v. Medical Bd. of Cal.

94 Cal. Rptr. 2d 61 · California Supreme Court · Apr 3, 2000

(Ibid.; see also Bowens v. Superior Court (1991) 1 Cal.4th 36, 48 [ 2 Cal.Rptr.2d 376 , 820 P.2d 600 ]; Lungren v. … Board of Directors (1949) 34 Cal.2d 125, 133-134 [ 208 P.2d 661 ].)

Palos Verdes Faculty Ass'n v. Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District

21 Cal. 3d 650 · California Supreme Court · Jul 19, 1978

Brown, Gerald A. Conradi and Brown & Conradi as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants. Trygstad & Odell, Lawrence B. Trygstad and Richard J. Schwab for Plaintiffs and Respondents. … Board of Equal., supra, 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 ; Stafford v. L.A. etc.

Miller v. Price

203 Cal. 772 · California Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1928

(Spear v. Monroe, 181 Cal. 728 [ 186 Pac. 149 ]; Brown v. Superior Court, 175 Cal. 141 [ 165 Pac. 429 ]; Crocker v. Crocker, 76 Cal. App. 606, 608 [ 235 Pac. 438 ].) … (See Jaques v. Board of Supervisors, 22 Cal. App. 627 [ 135 Pac. 686 ].) The motion to dismiss appeal is denied. Curtis, J., Preston, J., Richards, J., Seawell, J., Shenk, J., and Langdon, J., concurred.

People v. Parman

14 Cal. 2d 17 · California Supreme Court · Jul 11, 1939

(People v. Durrant, 116 Cal. 179, 199 [ 48 Pac. 75 ].) He cannot complain if he is tried by an impartial jury, and can demand nothing more. (Brown v. New Jersey, 175 U. S. 172, 175 [ 44 L. Ed. 119 , 20 Sup. … (People v. Pool, 27 Cal. 572, 573 ; People v. Brown, 53 Cal. App. 664 [ 200 Pac. 727 ].)

Cooper v. Leslie Salt Co.

70 Cal. 2d 627 · California Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1969

(See Silver v. Brown (1965) 63 Cal.2d 270, 274-275 [ 46 Cal.Rptr. 308 , 405 P.2d 132 ]; Miller v. Board of Supervisors (1965) 63 Cal.2d 343 [ 46 Cal.Rptr. 617 , 405 P.2d 857 ].)] … State Board of Guide Dogs for the Blind (1967) 67 Cal.2d 536, 540, fn. 1 [ 63 Cal.Rptr. 21 , 432 P.2d 717 ]; Smith v.

City of Montebello v. Vasquez

1 Cal. 5th 409 · California Supreme Court · Aug 8, 2016

In Flatley v. … There, a local board as well as individual board members were named respondents in a writ proceeding challenging a merit bonus awarded to a city official. (Id. at p. 1349.)

Smith v. City of Los Angeles

136 Cal. 156 · California Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1902

Which report was referred to the board of public works.” … Brown to construct the same at a cost not to exceed seventy-five dollars; stairs to be four feet wide in the clear. Which report was adopted by the following vote.”

Parker v. Riley

18 Cal. 2d 83 · California Supreme Court · May 29, 1941

(See Patton v. Board of Health, 127 Cal. 388, 395 [ 59 Pac. 702 , 78 Am. St. Rep. 66 ].) … Co. v. Garrett, 231 U. S. 298, 307 [34 Sup. Ct. 48, 58 L. Ed. 229 ] ; see, Brown, Administrative Commissions and the Judicial Power (1935), 19 Minn. L.

Percy v. Percy

188 Cal. 765 · California Supreme Court · May 25, 1922

(Cooper v. Cooper, 88 Cal. 45, 48 [ 25 Pac. 1062 ]; Andrews v. Andrews, 120 Cal. 184 [ 52 Pac. 298 ]; Avery v. Avery, 148 Cal. 239 [ 82 Pac. 967 ].) … (Brown v. Brown, 170 Cal. 1 [ 147 Pac. 1168 ].) The judgment must be modified.

Curtis v. City of Sacramento

70 Cal. 412 · California Supreme Court · Aug 17, 1886

(McCormick v. Brown, 36 Cal. 185 ; Chabot v. Tucker, 39 Cal. 437 .) … (Phelps v. Phelps, 3 Hare, 281.)

Larsen v. City & County of San Francisco

182 Cal. 1 · California Supreme Court · Jan 5, 1920

(Taylor v. Palmer, 31 Cal. 254 .) In Lent v. … (People v. Lynch, 51 Cal. 15 , [ 21 Am. Rep. 677 ]; Dyer v. Harrison, 63 Cal. 447 ; Higgins v. Brown, 76 Cal. 318 , [ 18 Pac. 373 ].) [15] It is obvious that these decisions do not apply to cases like the one at bar.

Grisby v. Clear Lake Water Works Co.

40 Cal. 396 · California Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1870

The testimony of Brown as an expert ought to have been admitted. … Simpson , 11 Ind. 84 ; Parker v. Hotchkiss , 25 Conn. 321 .)

Barnes v. City Council of Long Beach

204 Cal. 162 · California Supreme Court · May 11, 1928

Brown, and others, among whom is petitioner, have an action pending which has for its purpose the securing of a judgment declaring the whole of said annexation scheme a nullity. … The method provided in 1913 (Stats. 1913, p. 703, chap. 346) makes necessary a resolution of the board of supervisors of the county wherein the municipality is situated approving the exclusion, followed by a special election

City of San Francisco v. Canavan

42 Cal. 541 · California Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1872

In support of these propositions, I refer to the following authorities: Hart v. Burnett, 15 Cal. 568, 573 , et passim; Payne v. Tread-well, 16 id. 220; Brown v. … White , 27 id. 285; Grogan v. San Francisco , 18 id. 614 ; Stein-back v. Moore, 30 id. 506; Board of Education v. Fowler, 19 id. 20; Fulton v. Hanlon, 20 id. 480, et seq.; White v. Moses, *557 21 id. 41; Carleton v.

Professional Engineers in California Government v. Schwarzenegger

50 Cal. 4th 989 · California Supreme Court · Oct 4, 2010

(See, e.g., Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 181-196 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 487 , 624 P.2d 1215 ]; State Trial Attorneys’ Assn. v. … (Tirapelle, at pp. 1342-1343; Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown, supra, 29 Cal.3d at pp. 189-192.)

Carter v. Dept. of Veterans Affairs

44 Cal. Rptr. 3d 223 · California Supreme Court · Jun 8, 2006

Plaintiff asked Brown to stop making the false accusations, and complained about Brown's behavior to her supervisor. But Brown continued to harass her. … After plaintiff complained to her supervisor about Brown's behavior, he advised plaintiff to have no contact with Brown.

East Bay Municipal Utility District v. Appellate Department

23 Cal. 3d 839 · California Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1979

(Knoll v. … (See American Party of Texas v. White (1974) 415 U.S. 767 [ 39 L.Ed.2d 744 , 94 S.Ct. 1296 ]; Storer v. Brown (1974) 415 U.S. 724 [ 39 L.Ed.2d 714 , 94 S.Ct. 1274 ]; Lubin v.