Case law

Sanchez v. Fordyce

141 Cal. 427 · California Supreme Court · Dec 26, 1903

(Pratt v. Browne, 135 Cal. 650 .) It cannot classify townships for the purpose of regulating compensation. … In People v.

People ex rel. Cochran v. Bd. of Educ. of Oakland

54 Cal. 375 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1880

Jones v. Perry, 59. *377 The rule so clearly laid down by the learned Justice we adopt as correct. … (People v. Bush, 40 Cal. 344 ; Spring Valley Water Works v. Bryant, 52 Cal. 132 ; The People v. Mayor, 2 Hill. 9; In the Matter of Mt. Morris Square, 2 Id. 14; In re Salinas County, 45 Mo. 52 ; People v.

Bannerman v. Boyle

160 Cal. 197 · California Supreme Court · Jun 8, 1911

There is nothing contrary to these conclusions in Wilson v. Fisher, 140 Cal. 188 , [ 73 Pac. 850 ]; Anderson v. Browning, 140 Cal. 222 , [ 73 Pac. 986 ]; Tout v. Blair, 3 Cal. App. 180 , [ 84 Pac. 671 ]; Merkley v. … St. 484; Board v. Barrow, 13 Colo. 468 , [ 16 Am. St. Rep. 215 , 22 Pac. 784 ]; Dullam v. *206 Wilson, 53 Mich. 407, [ 51 Am. Rep. 128 , 19 N. W. 112 ]; Page v. Hardin, 8 B. Mon. (Ky.) 672; State v. Bryce, 7 Ohio St.

Trabue Pittman Corp. v. County of Los Angeles

29 Cal. 2d 385 · California Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1946

Co. v. State Board of Equalization, supra, 12 Cal.2d 127, 136 .) … Co. v. State Board of Equalization, supra, 12 Cal.2d 127, 130 .)

Peck v. Eastern Star Homes

17 Cal. 2d 853 · California Supreme Court · Apr 28, 1941

Appellant cites Estate of Dol, 182 Cal. 159 [ 187 Pac. 428 ], Brown v. La Societe Francaise, etc., 138 Cal. 475 [ 71 Pac. 516 ], and Gorman v. … Grand Master, 25 Ind. 518; Duke v. Fuller, 9 N. H. 536 [ 32 Am. Dec. 392 ]; Morrow v. Smith (Re Wilson), supra; Most Worshipful Grand Lodge v. Board of Review, 281 Ill. 480 [ 117 N. E. 1016 ]; Roberts v. Corson, 79 N.

In Re Marriage of Hisquierdo

19 Cal. 3d 613 · California Supreme Court · Jul 12, 1977

(Waite v. Waite (1972) 6 Cal.3d 461 , 470 *616 [ 99 Cal.Rptr. 325 , 492 P.2d 13 ] (overruled on other grounds in In re Marriage of Brown (1976) 15 Cal.3d 838, 851, fn. 14 [ 126 Cal.Rptr. 633 , 544 P.2d 561 ]).) … (Alien v. Allen (Tex.Civ.App. 1962) 363 S.W.2d 312 .) We do not find Allen persuasive for all the reasons discussed herein. (Compare In re Marriage of Brown, supra, 15 Cal.3d 838, 851 .)

Santa Clara County Counsel Attorneys Ass'n v. Woodside

7 Cal. 4th 525 · California Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1994

Board of Supervisors (1992) 3 Cal.App.4th 1482 [ 5 Cal.Rptr.2d 176 ]; Social Services Union v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 222 Cal.App.3d 279 ; American Federation of State etc. Employees v. … (See generally, Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168 , 186 et seq. [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 487 , 624 P.2d 1215 ].)

Dowling v. Altschul

4 Cal. Unrep. 58 · California Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1893

To the point that the error could not have been corrected on appeal, and, therefore, that defendant is not concluded by the decision of the board of supervisors, counsel for respondents cite People v. … Rep. 677 , Dyer v. Harrison, 63 Cal. 448 , and Diggins v. Brown, 76 Cal. 318 , 18 Pac. 373 .

Maxwell v. Bd. of Supervisors of Stanislaus Cty.

53 Cal. 389 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1879

Linden v. … McCoy v.

Consolidated Title Securities Co. v. Hopkins

1 Cal. 2d 414 · California Supreme Court · Aug 6, 1934

Under the decisions of this court in Whitmore v. Brown, 207 Cal. 473 [ 279 Pac. 447 ], and Central Mfg. Dist. v. … (Morgan Adams, Inc., v. Los Angeles County, supra, at p. 702; Central Mfg. District, Inc., v. State Board of Equalization, supra.)

Wright v. Central California Colony Water Co.

67 Cal. 532 · California Supreme Court · Sep 28, 1885

(Brown v. Pacific M. S. Co. 5 Blatchf. 525 ; Walker v. Deveraux, 4 Paige, 225 ; Webb v. Ridgely, 38 Md. 364 .) The abolition of the District Court did not destroy or affect the right to invalidate a voidable election. … In that way a minority of the stockholders would be enabled to secure representation upon the board of directors by electing one or more of the directors.

People v. Shannon

203 Cal. 139 · California Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1928

(People v. Durant, 116 Cal. 179, 199 [ 48 Pac. 75 ].) He cannot complain if he is tried by an impartial jury, and can demand nothing more. (Brown v. New Jersey, 175 U. S. 172, 175 [ 44 L. Ed. 119 , 20 Sup. Ct. … (People v. Lee Gam, 69 Cal. 552 [ 11 Pac. 183 ]; People v. Chaves, 122 Cal. 134, 140 [ 54 Pac. 596 ].)

McCarthy v. Mount Tecarte Land & Water Co.

111 Cal. 328 · California Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1896

In Chipman v. … (See Taylor on Private Corporations, secs, 646, 647, and cases cited; Brown v. Republican etc. Silver Mines, 17 Col. 421 .)

People v. West

4 Cal. 2d 367 · California Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1935

They left Lockwood and the automobile and boarded a street car back to town. They stopped at a cleaning establishment where blood was removed from the sweater Smith was wearing. … (People v. Negra, 208 Cal. 64, 69, 70 [ 280 Pac. 354 ], and cases cited.)

Coburn v. Ames

52 Cal. 385 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1877

(Harris v. Thompson, 9 Barb. 361 ; Charles River Br. Co. v. Warren Br. Co. 11 Pet. 420 ; Renwich v. Morris, 3 Hill, 621 ; Calkin v. Brown, 2 Wend. 667 ; Queen v. G. N. f M. R. Co. 9 Ad. & E. 315.) … (Gough v. Bell, 2 Zaluskie, 441; Kingman v. Sparrow, 12 Barb. 201 ; Hart v. Hill, 1 Mart. 135 ; Chess v. Manown, 3 Watts, 219 ; Bird v. Smith, 8 Watts, 434 ; Cooper v. Smith, 9 S. & R. 26; Chambers v.

Drillon v. Industrial Accident Commission

17 Cal. 2d 346 · California Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1941

(Los Flores School Dist. v. Industrial Acc. Com., 13 Cal. App. (2d) 180 [ 56 Pac. (2d) 581 ]; Hillen v. Industrial Acc. Com., 199 Cal. 577 [ 250 Pac. 570 ]; Schaller v. Industrial Acc. … (Brown v. Industrial Acc. Com., 174 Cal. 457 [ 163 Pac. 664 ].)

Boling v. Pub. Emp't Relations Bd.

220 Cal. Rptr. 3d 671 · California Supreme Court · Jul 26, 2017

Welton v. City of Los Angeles

18 Cal. 3d 497 · California Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1976

Moreover, during the pendency of this case, the United States Supreme Court decided Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. … (Mulkey v. Reitman (1966) 64 Cal.2d 529, 543 [ 50 Cal.Rptr. 881 , 413 P.2d 825 ]; Franklin Life Ins. Co. v. State Board of Equalization (1965) 63 Cal.2d 222, 227 [ 45 Cal.Rptr. 869 , 404 P.2d 477 ].)

In Re Marriage of Stenquist

21 Cal. 3d 779 · California Supreme Court · Aug 7, 1978

Board of Administration (1970) 3 Cal.3d 32 [ 89 Cal. Rptr. 61 , 473 P.2d 765 ].) … Board of Administration, supra, 3 Cal.3d 32 , *794 42-43; Benson v. City of Los Angeles (1963) 60 Cal.2d 355, 360-362 [ 33 Cal. Rptr. 257 , 384 P.2d 649 ]; In re Marriage of Peterson (1974) 41 Cal.

Ashley v. Vischer

24 Cal. 322 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1864

In the case of Sannickson v. … Brown, 5 Cal. 57 , a number of accounts for labor and services, and for goods and materials furnished for the use of defendants, under the name of the “ Laura Virginia Association,” had been presented to the Board of Trustees