Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscal

10,000+ results

1.45s

  • Bowen v. Board of Retirement of Los Angeles County Employees' Retirement Ass'n

    42 Cal. 3d 572 · California Supreme Court · Sep 25, 1986

    (Van Hook v. Board of Retirement (1983) 148 Cal.App.3d 714, 716, fn. 1 [ 196 Cal.Rptr. 186 ]; DePuy v. Board of Retirement (1978) 87 Cal.App.3d 392, 396 [ 150 Cal.Rptr. 791 , 12 A.L.R.4th 1150 ].) … (Lundak v. Board of Retirement, supra, 142 Cal.App.3d at p. 1046 , original italics.)

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Steinbach v. Moore

    30 Cal. 498 · California Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1866

    Clark, 18 Cal. 535 and 20 Cal. 387 , as well as Brown v. San Francisco, 16 Cal. 451 , and Hart v. Burnett, 15 Cal. 530 ; but it comes too late. Mr. Chief Justice Field, in delivering the opinion of the Court in Leese v. … (Strother v. Lucas, 12 Pet. 438 ; Barry v. Gamble, 3 How. 33 McCabe v. Worthington, 16 How. 96 .) While such act remains to be done, the grant is regarded as inchoate or imperfect.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • County of Contra Costa v. Soto

    138 Cal. 57 · California Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1902

    Brown, the district attorney of plaintiff, as plaintiff’s attorney. There is no allegation nor claim that the action is brought by order or direction of the board of supervisors of the county. … The board of supervisors had the right to make the contract with Armstrong, who was not a county officer, and to pay him a percentage for making the collection. (Lassen County v. Shinn, 88 Cal. 510 ; Power v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Kendrick

    52 Cal. 2d 517 · California Supreme Court · Jul 10, 1959

    Lyckberg, 95 Cal.App. 71, 72-73 [ 272 P. 606 ] ; Noble v. City of Palo Alto, 89 Cal.App. 47, 52 [ 264 P. 529 ] ; cf. Brown v. Boyd, 33 Cal.App.2d 416, 422 [ 91 P.2d 926 ]; Coulter v. … of Public Works, A Treasurer, The Members of the Board of Education, A City School Superintendent, The Members of the Boards of the Departments and the Chief Administrative Officer of each Department.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • People v. Jefferson

    86 Cal. Rptr. 2d 893 · California Supreme Court · Aug 2, 1999

    V, § 8, subd. (b).) … The power to grant parole, and to determine whether and when it shall be granted, belongs to the Board of Prison Terms and to the Governor, to the exclusion of the *908 judiciary. (Cal. Const., art. V, § 8, subd.

    Cited 266 timesPublished
  • Fisk v. Mitchell

    124 Cal. 359 · California Supreme Court · May 3, 1899

    By his answer in the present case Brown raised the issue whether said judgment was duly given and made. … (Kane v. Desmond, 63 Cal. 464 .) The judgment appealed from should be reversed, with directions to the court below to grant a new trial. Chipman, C., and Haynes, C., concurred.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • People v. Breyfogle

    17 Cal. 504 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1861

    The cases of The City of Sacramento v. Dunlap and People v. Buster are widely different in the facts from this case. 2. … It is averred in the complaint that the bond was approved by the Board of Supervisors.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Brawner v. State Bar

    48 Cal. 2d 814 · California Supreme Court · Jul 10, 1957

    (Browne v. State Bar, 45 Cal.2d 165, 168, 169 [ 287 P.2d 745 ]; Hildebrand v. State Bar, 18 Cal.2d 816, 834 [ 117 P.2d 860 ] ; Furmam, v. State Bar, 12 Cal.2d 212, 229 [ 83 P.2d 12 ] ; see Lindenbaum v. … (Browne v. State Bar, supra, 45 Cal.2d at p. 170 ; Werner v. State Bar, 13 Cal.2d 666, 676-677 [ 91 P.2d 881 ].)

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Pioche v. Paul

    22 Cal. 105 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1863

    Bernal died in 1850, and his heirs filed a claim under the grant, before the Board of United States Land Commissioners, which was duly confirmed by said Board, and also on appeal, by the United States District Court, and … Brown, dated June 4th, 1857; deed from Harvey S. Brown to J. Mora Moss, *112 dated September 30th, 1858 ; deed from J. Mora Moss to the plaintiff, dated January 2d, 1860.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Shaw v. Pacific Greyhound Lines

    50 Cal. 2d 153 · California Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1958

    (Brown v. George Pepperdine Foundation, 23 Cal.2d 256, 261-262 [ 143 P.2d 929 ] ; England v. Hospital of Good Samaritan, 22 Cal.App.2d 226, 230 [ 70 P.2d 692 ] ; Ellis v. Jewett, 18 Cal.App.2d 629, 634 [ 64 P.2d 432 ].) … (Brown v. George Pepperdine Foundation, 23 Cal.2d 256, 261-262 [ 143 P.2d 929 ]; England v. Hospital of Good Samaritan, 22 Cal.App.2d 226, 230 [ 70 P.2d 692 ] ; Ellis v. Jewett, 18 Cal.App.2d 629, 634 [ 64 P.2d 432 ].)

    Cited 82 timesPublished
  • County of Inyo v. Given

    183 Cal. 415 · California Supreme Court · Jul 28, 1920

    (City of Anaheim v. … (Symons v. San Francisco, 115 Cal. 555 , [ 42 Pac. 913 , 47 Pac. 453 ]; Brown v. Board of Supervisors, 124 Cal. 274 , [ 57 Pac. 82 ]; Swift v. Board of Supervisors, 16 Cal. App. 72 , [ 116 Pac. 317 ].)

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Lally v. Kuster

    177 Cal. 783 · California Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1918

    Brown, the defendant in the foreclosure proceeding. George Brown died at the age of twenty-eight. … Brown.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Hoffman v. Board of Retirement of Los Angeles County Employees' Retirement Ass'n

    42 Cal. 3d 590 · California Supreme Court · Sep 25, 1986

    (DiGenova v. State Board of Education (1962) 57 Cal.2d 167, 176 [ 18 Cal.Rptr. 369 , 367 P.2d 865 ].) … (Id., at p. 579; DePuy v. Board of Retirement (1978) 87 Cal.App.3d 392, 399 [ 150 Cal.Rptr. 791 , 12 A.L.R.4th 1150 ].)

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Imperial Land Co. v. Imperial Irr. Dist.

    173 Cal. 668 · California Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1916

    (Gleason v. Gleason, 54 Cal. 135 ; Brown v. Valley View Min. Co., 127 Cal. 630 , [ 60 Pac. 424 ]; Bowman v. Wohlke, 166 Cal. 121 , [Ann. Cas. 1915B, 1011, 135 Pac. 37 ].) … (Wittenbrock v. Bellmer, 57 Cal. 12 ; Gordon v. San Diego, 108 Cal. 264 , [ 41 Pac. 301 ]; Hill v. Den, 121 Cal. 42 , [ 53 Pac. 642 ].)

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • City of San Diego v. Board of Trustees of the California State University

    61 Cal. 4th 945 · California Supreme Court · Aug 3, 2015

    County of San Diego v. … Name of Opinion City of San Diego v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Sponogle v. Curnow

    136 Cal. 580 · California Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1902

    Smith v. Brown, 59 Cal. 673 , was a case involving the removal of a police officer of the city of Sacramento by the police commissioners thereof. … In State v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Santa Cruz Gap Turnpike Joint Stock Co. v. Board of Supervisors

    2 Cal. Unrep. 650 · California Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1886

    This was an application to the superior court of the county of Santa Clara for a writ of mandate to compel the board of supervisors of that county to locate tollgates and to fix rates of toll on a certain road which it was

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mehollin v. Ysuchiyama

    11 Cal. 2d 53 · California Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1938

    This witness testified that on the concrete floor beneath one of the piles of boxes were several boards, about % of an inch thick, being the'top boards removed from lug boxes, and that these boards protruded about a foot … (Anstead v. Pacific G. & E. Co., 203 Cal. 634 [ 265 Pac. 487 ]; Foster v. Fernandes, 200 Cal. 274 [ 252 Pac. 726 ]; Ales v. Ryan, 8 Cal. (2d) 82, 100 [ 64 Pac. (2d) 409 ].)

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Anderson v. State Bar

    17 Cal. 2d 375 · California Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1941

    State Bar, 211 Cal. 579 [ 296 Pac. 280 , 297 Pac. 19 ], Herron v. State Bar, 212 Cal. 196 [ 298 Pac. 474 ], Peck v. State Bar, 217 Cal. 47 [ 17 Pac. (2d) 112 ], Egan v. … (Mills v. State Bar, 211 Cal. 579 [ 296 Pac. 280 , 297 Pac. 19 ], Brown v. State Bar, 2 Cal. (2d) 533 [ 42 Pac. (2d) 306 ]; Dalzell v. State Bar, 6 Cal. (2d) 433 [ 57 Pac. (2d) 1300 ], Padgham v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Gooch v. Hendrix

    5 Cal. 4th 266 · California Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1993

    That testimony of an elector of the West Fresno/Washington Union School Districts established candidate Mary Bess and Leroy Brown brought an absentee ballot to the elector’s home, and that Brown completed her ballot for her … The witness denied she had either consented to this procedure, instructed Brown to vote her ballot, or been consulted by Brown concerning the choices made on her ballot. 4 The trial court’s written findings further noted

    Cited 44 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.