Case law

Dibb v. County of San Diego

8 Cal. 4th 1200 · California Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1994

in large cities possess power to issue subpoenas]; see also Brown v. … (see, e.g., Brown v.

People v. DeLeon

220 Cal. Rptr. 3d 784 · California Supreme Court · Jul 24, 2017

(Valdivia v. Brown, supra, 956 F.Supp.2d at pp. 1135–1137.) … (Valdivia v. Brown, supra, 956 F.Supp.2d at pp. 1127–1128.) The lawsuit was later dismissed as moot due to the passage of the Realignment Act. (Valdivia v. Brown, at pp. 1135–1140.)

Southern California Rapid Transit District, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

23 Cal. 3d 158 · California Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1979

(RTD) seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denying reconsideration of an award of temporary disability benefits to respondent Elliot Weitzman (Weitzman). … Co. v. Workers’ Comp.

People ex rel. Attorney-General v. Scannell

7 Cal. 432 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1857

He also refers to the cases of Henderson v. Brown, 1 Caines, 92 ; Easton v. Calendar, 11 Wend., 95 ; Britton v. Kinnaird, 4 Moore, 50; and Betts v. … The same learned Judge, in commenting upon the case of Henderson v. Brown, says: “ But this is very different from the case in which they were not to exercise any judgment at all over the subject.

California State Personnel Board v. California State Employees Ass'n, Local 1000

31 Cal. Rptr. 3d 201 · California Supreme Court · Jul 28, 2005

(Wiles v. State Personnel Board (1942) 19 Cal.2d 344, 347 [ 121 P.2d 673 ]; see § 19173, subds. (a), (b).) … Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 487 , 624 P.2d 1215 ] (Pacific Legal Foundation).

Skidgel v. Cal. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd.

238 Cal. Rptr. 3d 118 · California Supreme Court · Sep 26, 2018

People ex rel. Board of State Harbor Commissioners v. Roberts

3 Cal. Unrep. 372 · California Supreme Court · Jan 4, 1891

Ed. 370 ; Cannon v. City of New Orleans, 20 Wall. 577 , 22 L. Ed. 417 ; Benedict v. Vanderbilt, 1 Rob. (N. Y.) 194. … The power to collect wharfage is derived from the legislature, and the board of harbor commissioners is the agent of the state, with such powers, and no others, as are conferred upon it by the legislature.

City and County of San Francisco v. Cooper

13 Cal. 3d 898 · California Supreme Court · Apr 4, 1975

The “meet and confer” procedure sanctioned by the Meyers-Milias-Brown (MMB) Act (Gov. … The original Brown Act, however, continues to govern the labor relations of many state employees.

Coachella Valley Mosquito & Vector Control District v. California Public Employment Relations Board

29 Cal. Rptr. 3d 234 · California Supreme Court · Jun 9, 2005

The Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (Gov. … (Brown v. Bleiberg (1982) 32 Cal.3d 426, 437 [ 186 Cal.Rptr. 228 , 651 P.2d 815 ]; Rosefield Packing Co. v. Superior Court (1935) 4 Cal.2d 120, 122-123 [ 47 P.2d 716 ]; Carlson v.

City of Los Angeles v. Post War Public Works Review Board

26 Cal. 2d 101 · California Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1945

(See County of Los Angeles v. LaFuente, supra, p. 876-877, citing many cases; County of Alameda v. Janssen, supra, p. 282 , and cases cited; Housing Authority v. Dockweiler, supra, p. 451 ; Veterans’ Welfare Board v. … (See Reclamation Board v.

People ex rel. Board of State Harbor Commissioners v. Fairfield

90 Cal. 186 · California Supreme Court · Jul 13, 1891

of state harbor commissioners, as his official duty required, they introduced certain books which the secretary of said board is required to keep by section 2522 of the Political Code. … A case strictly in point is that of Funk v. *189 Ely, 45 Pa. St. 444.

A. R. G. Bus Co. v. Board of Public Utilities

181 Cal. 508 · California Supreme Court · Nov 14, 1919

THE COURT. [1] The court is of the opinion that the action of the Board of Public Utilities of the City of Los Angeles which is sought to be reviewed herein, was purely legislative in character.

People ex rel. State Board of Harbor Commissioners v. Steamer America

34 Cal. 676 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1868

(See Be Lovio v. Boit, 2 Gall. 398 ; The Thomas Jefferson, 10 Wheat. 428; and other cases cited.) … (See State Treasurer v. Collector of Sangamon County, 28 Ill. 509 .) Judgment affirmed.

Meyers v. El Tejon Oil & Refining Co.

29 Cal. 2d 184 · California Supreme Court · Nov 1, 1946

holding of a regular meeting of the board or the passing of a resolution declaring the ratification (Brown, v. … “Anything from which it may be clearly found . . . that the board as a board has agreed that the void act should be binding will suffice.” (Milligan v. C. D. Milligan Grocer Co., 207 Mo.App. 472 [ 233 S.W. 506, 510 ].)

City Street Improvement Co. v. Babcock

6 Cal. Unrep. 910 · California Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1902

The findings should be of the ultimate facts pleaded, not of the probative facts: McCarthy v. Brown, 113 Cal. 15 , 45 Pac. 14 . The ultimate fact to be found is the jurisdiction of the board to pass the resolution. … Thereupon the filing is completed: Burrill, Law Diet., “File”; Holman v. Chevaillier’s Admr., 14 Tex. 337 .

A. R. G. Bus Co. v. Board of Public Utilities

181 Cal. 508 · California Supreme Court · Nov 14, 1919

[1] The court is of the opinion that the action of the Board of Public Utilities of the City of Los Angeles which is sought to be reviewed herein, was purely legislative in character.

A. R. G. Bus Co. v. Board of Public Utilities

181 Cal. 508 · California Supreme Court · Nov 14, 1919

THE COURT. [1] The court is of the opinion that the action of the Board of Public Utilities of the City of Los Angeles which is sought to be reviewed herein, was purely legislative in character.

People ex rel. Beltner v. City of Riverside

66 Cal. 288 · California Supreme Court · Jan 5, 1885

Cusacke, 2 Rolle, 113; People v. … (State v. Brown, 31 N. J. L. 355.) There is no defect of parties defendant, by reason of the omission to join the trustees of the defendant with it. According to People v. Carpenter, and State v.

Peatros v. BANK OF AMERICA NT & SA

91 Cal. Rptr. 2d 659 · California Supreme Court · Jan 10, 2000

(Dis. opn. of Brown, J., post, at p. 183.) … (Dis. opn. of Brown, J., post, at p. 185.)

People ex rel. Dean v. Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County

122 Cal. 421 · California Supreme Court · Nov 25, 1898

This has been decided in a long unbroken line of cases, beginning with Chard v. Harrison, 7 Cal. 113 , and ending with Quinchard v. Board of Trustees, 113 Cal. 664 . … Murray v.