Case law

Monroe v. State Bar

55 Cal. 2d 145 · California Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1961

The evidence supports Antonia’s version of what occurred and the finding of the board that petitioner violated his duties as an attorney. In Foote v. … (Coviello v.

McDonald v. Antelope Valley Community College District

45 Cal. 4th 88 · California Supreme Court · Oct 27, 2008

The Chancellor’s Office further advised Brown the District would have until January 31, 2002, to resolve the complaint, and Brown thereafter would have a right to appeal to the local board of trustees and, in some cases, … On February 14, 2002, plaintiffs appealed these findings to the District’s board of *98 trustees. The board of trustees affirmed the findings.

Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

40 Cal. 4th 1 · California Supreme Court · Nov 13, 2006

Code, supra, foll. § 11430.80, p. 322; see also English v. … (Morning Star Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization (2006) 38 Cal. 4th 324, 328 [ 42 Cal.Rptr.3d 47 , 132 P.3d 249 ]; Santa Clara County Local Transportation Authority v.

Social Workers' Union, Local 535 v. Alameda County Welfare Department

11 Cal. 3d 382 · California Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1974

Board of Education v. … Torrance Education Assn. v. Board of Education (1971) 21 Cal.App.3d 589 [ 98 Cal.Rptr. 639 ], also relied upon by respondent, held merely that the Winton Act (Ed.

Lindros v. Governing Board of the Torrance Unified School District

9 Cal. 3d 524 · California Supreme Court · May 31, 1973

(Bekiaris v. Board of Education, supra, 6 Cal.3d at p. 589 .) … , *537 using, on several occasions in his speech, the words “mother fucker”; in Brown v.

Stein v. Simpson

37 Cal. 2d 79 · California Supreme Court · May 4, 1951

The eases such as Bateman v. Kellogg, 59 Cal.App. 464 [ 211 P. 46 ]; Olivero v. Rosano, 42 Cal.App.2d 740 [ 109 P.2d 976 ]; Wolfe v. Titus, 124 Cal. 264 [ 56 P. 1042 ]; Savings & Loan Soc. v. … As said in People v.

Jameson v. Hayward

106 Cal. 682 · California Supreme Court · Apr 3, 1895

(Martin v. Walker, 58 Cal. 590 ; De Uprey v. De Uprey, 27 Cal. 329 ; 87 Am. Dec. 81 ; Morenhout v. Higuera, 32 Cal. 290 ; Hancock v. Lopez, 53 Cal. 371 .) Martin v. … (Rumpp *689 v. Gerkens, 59 Cal. 496 ; Bailey v. Richardson, 66 Cal. 416 .)

People ex rel. Beckwith v. Board of Education of Oakland

55 Cal. 331 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1880

It was suggested that in Alameda County, for instance, there might be a general board for the county, a board for the city of Oakland, and a board for some particular town *336 ship ; in such case, which board, would have … The board in a city is local as to.the city; the board of a township is local as to the township, and the board of a county is local as to the county; and where portions of a county are subject to local boards for such portions

Voices of the Wetlands v. CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD

74 Cal. Rptr. 3d 453 · California Supreme Court · Mar 19, 2008

74 Cal.Rptr.3d 453 (2008) 180 P.3d 223 VOICES OF THE WETLANDS v. CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD (Duke Energy Moss Landing LLC). No. S160211. Supreme Court of California. March 19, 2008. … Further action in this matter is deferred pending the dispositions of the petitions for certiorari in the United States Supreme Court in Entergy Corp. v. EPA, Nov. 2, 2007, No. 07-588; PSEG Fossil LLC. v.

Big Boy Liquors, Ltd. v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

71 Cal. 2d 1226 · California Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1969

(See Samson Market Co. v. Alcoholic Bev. etc. Appeals Bd., ante , at pp. 1218-1221; Wilke & Holzheiser, Inc. v. … We held in Kirby v. Alcoholic Bev. etc.

Western Lithograph Co. v. State Board of Equalization

11 Cal. 2d 776 · California Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1938

The facts herein are similar to those stated in the opinion this day filed in the case of Western Lithograph Co. v. State Board of Equalization, S. F.

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

16 Cal. 4th 1187 · California Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1997

Co. v. … J., Baxter, J., Chin, J., and Brown, J. concurred.

Rudell v. Board of Administration of State Employees' Retirement System

8 Cal. 2d 600 · California Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1937

(Waring v. Wilcox, 8 Cal. App. 317 [ 96 Pac. 910 ]; Lampkin v. Travelers’ Ins. Co., 11 Colo. App. 249 [ 52 Pac. 1040 ].) ” *603 In the petition for hearing defendant urges that the cases of Boigneres v. … Boulon, 54 Cal. 146 , and Hanks v. Naglec, 54 Cal. 52 [ 35 Am. Rep. 67 ], are opposed to the conclusion reached above.

Browne v. State Bar

45 Cal. 2d 165 · California Supreme Court · Sep 28, 1955

. — Petitioner, Lionel Browne, seeks a review of disciplinary proceedings in which the Board of Governors of The State Bar recommended that he be suspended from the practice of the law for a period of three years. … As we said in Egan v.

County of San Diego v. McClurken

37 Cal. 2d 683 · California Supreme Court · Aug 24, 1951

Murphy; Town of Marblehead v. Rosenthal; Town of Burlington v. Dunn; Austin v. Older; Women’s Christian Ass’n. of Kansas City v. Brown; In re Botz; Home Fuel Oil Co. v. Glen Rock; DeVito v. Pearsall; Pisicchio v. … Bean; In re Botz; Women’s Christian Ass’n. of Kansas City v.. Brown; Appeal of Yocom; supra, note 1.)

People ex rel. Dougherty v. Board of Election Commissioners

2 Cal. Unrep. 287 · California Supreme Court · Mar 17, 1884

of the first board of supervisors, and is entitled to a certificate of election; that the clause above quoted is self-executing and requires no legislation. … This court had occasion to consider this question in Desmond v. Dunn, 55 Cal., and its views thereon will be found on pages 248, 249.

Fitzgerald v. Gorham

4 Cal. 290 · California Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1854

Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

2 Cal. 3d 78 · California Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1970

For the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. … Fund v. Ind. Acc. Com. (Patterson) (1952) 39 Cal.2d 83 [ 244 P.2d 889 ]; Subsequent Injuries Fund V. I.A.C. (Pranzitelli) (1957) 151 Cal.App.2d 606 [ 312 P.2d 78 ]; State of Cal. v. Industrial Acc. Com.

Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

2 Cal. 3d 81 · California Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1970

This is also a companion case to Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. (Talcott) ante, page 56 [ 84 Cal.Rptr. 140 , 465 P.2d 28 ]. … This case is factually similar to Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Industrial Acc. Com. (Ferguson) (1960) 178 Cal.App.2d 55 [ 2 Cal.Rptr. 646 ], and State of California v. Ind. Acc. Com.

Morongo Band of Mission Indians v. State Water Resources Control Board

45 Cal. 4th 731 · California Supreme Court · Feb 9, 2009

(Withrow v. Larkin, supra, 421 U.S. 35, 54 ; see Adams v. Commission on Judicial Performance (1995) 10 Cal.4th 866, 880-884 [ 42 Cal.Rptr.2d 606 , 897 P.2d 544 ]; Kloepfer v. … We disapprove any language in Quintero v.