Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,021 results
6.21s
District Court, E.D. California · Nov 17, 2020
Brown, No. 90-cv-0520 LKK JFM (E.D. 27 Cal.), and Plata v. Brown, No. C01-1351 TEH (N.D. Cal.). See also Plata v. Schwarzenegger, No. 3:01-CV-01351-TEH (N.D. … See 10 Sellars v. Procunier, 641 F.2d 1295, 1302-03 (9th Cir. 1981). But parole board officials are not 11 entitled to absolute immunity for claims for injunctive or declaratory relief. In Tripp v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownCheryl D. Dresdner, et al. v. Sacramento County Jail, et al.
District Court, E.D. California · Nov 3, 2025
For example, parole board officials enjoy absolute immunity from 19 suit “when processing parole applications.” Sellars v. Procunier, 641 F.2d 1295, 1302 (9th Cir.), 20 cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1102 (1981); Brown v. … Ivey v. 6 Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982).
Cited 0 timesUnknownBoard of Trustees of the Kern County Electrical Workers Health & Welfare Trust v. McCaa
District Court, E.D. California · Feb 15, 2024
Hilao v. … United States v. Feldman, 324 F. Supp. 2d 1112, 3 1116 (C.D. Cal. 2004) (quoting Imperial Bank v. Pim Elec., Inc., 33 Cal. App.4th 540, 547 4 (1995)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Nov 18, 2024
Stat. 3 Ch. 35; Brown v. Smith, 24 Cal. … Brown, 674 F.3d 1128, 1134 (9th Cir. 2012) (quoting L.A. 17 Cnty. Bar Ass’n v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown756 F. Supp. 1351 · District Court, E.D. California · Feb 14, 1991
Defendants are the Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture (“Secretary”), the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) and the Almond Board of California (“Board”). … Winter v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedMerced Irrigation District v. County of Mariposa
941 F. Supp. 2d 1237 · District Court, E.D. California · Apr 23, 2013
Laborers Vacation Trust (“Franchise Tax Board ”), 463 U.S. 1, 9 , 103 S.Ct. 2841 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983)); see also Nevada v. Bank of Am. Corp., 672 F.3d 661, 674 (9th Cir.2012). … Local Agency is defined in § 6252(a) as including a county or any board, commission, or agency thereof. . See, e.g., Center for Biological Diversity v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedCentral Valley Water Agency v. United States
327 F. Supp. 2d 1180 · District Court, E.D. California · Jun 24, 2004
See United States v. State Water Resources Control Board, 182 Cal.App.3d 82 , 227 Cal.Rptr. 161 (1986) (“Racanelli Opinion”). 13. … FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000) (quoting Davis v. Mich. Dep’t of Treasury, 489 U.S. 803, 809 , 109 S.Ct. 1500 , 103 L.Ed.2d 891 (1989)).
Cited 8 timesPublishedEarth Island Institute v. Gibson
834 F. Supp. 2d 979 · District Court, E.D. California · Jul 13, 2011
Brown, et al. (“Brown study”) study, which is cited in the EA and states, in pertinent part: Small and large downed woody fuels contribute differently to the various elements of fire hazard. … Hanson’s comment concerning the Brown study in the body of the final EA, stating: “A study by Brown et al. ... acknowledges that leaving high amounts of coarse woody debris leads to high or even severe resistence-to-control
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. California · Jul 25, 2023
See 12 Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). … See Leer v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Aug 30, 2022
meetings as well as ex parte communications via phone and email to the individual Board members, Goff, Dixon, Dingman, 25 and/or Winston in violation of the Brown Act, and to plan and/or … Plaintiff claims this was done without approval of the HCSD board in violation of the 15 Brown Act and California Government Code § 61045.
Cited 0 timesUnknownAssociation of Irritated Residents v. C & R Vanderham Dairy
435 F. Supp. 2d 1078 · District Court, E.D. California · Jun 16, 2006
Moreover, a decision that Vanderham does not need to obtain a permit falls outside the scope of hearing board review. … Porter v. Board of Trs. of Manahattan Beach Unified Sch. Dist., 307 F.3d 1064, 1070 (9th Cir.2002); Tomas v. Rubin, 926 F.2d 906, 911 (9th Cir.1991); Morrison-Knudsen Co. v.
Cited 19 timesPublishedCONSORTIUM OF COM. BASED ORGANIZATIONS v. Donovan
530 F. Supp. 520 · District Court, E.D. California · Jan 11, 1982
Stafford v. Briggs, 444 U.S. 527, 535 , 100 S.Ct. 774, 780 , 63 L.Ed.2d 1 (1980); Richards v. United States, 369 U.S. 1, 11 , 82 S.Ct. 585, 591-92 , 7 L.Ed.2d 492 (1962); Brown v. … See Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Trustees of the Kern County Electrical Workers Health & Welfare Trust v. McCaa
District Court, E.D. California · Aug 27, 2021
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BOARD … Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991); Wilkerson 3 v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownHome Care Association of America v. Gavin Newsom
District Court, E.D. California · Mar 11, 2021
Brown, 554 25 U.S. 60 (2008). … Brown, 554 11 U.S. at 68, quoting NLRB v. Gissel Packing Co., 395 U.S. 575, 618 (1969). This precedent does 12 not directly resolve the question of whether Machinists preemption applies to AB 2455.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBoard of Trustees of the Kern County Electrical Workers Health & Welfare Trust v. McCaa
District Court, E.D. California · Jun 14, 2021
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BOARD … Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the 27 Court ORDERS: 1 1.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSaini v. US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
553 F. Supp. 2d 1170 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 27, 2008
Fu v. Gonzales, 2007 WL 1742376 at *5, citing Yu v. Brown, 36 F.Supp.2d 922, 933-34 (D.N.M. 1999). … Liang v. Attorney General, 2007 WL 3225441 at *5, citing Yu v. Brown, 36 F.Supp.2d at 932 .
Cited 0 timesPublished636 F. Supp. 2d 1045 · District Court, E.D. California · Jun 29, 2009
In light of these circumstances, a factfinder could reasonably infer that the Hollister Board’s limited annual monitoring of HolliShare trustees was insufficient. See Leigh v. … V 13.)
Cited 7 timesPublishedBoard of Trustees of the Kern County Electrical Workers Health & Welfare Trust v. McCaa
District Court, E.D. California · Sep 27, 2021
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BOARD … (Doc. 29 at 11, citing Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 26 (9th Cir. 1991); Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 834 (9th Cir. 2014).)
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Apr 22, 2021
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BOARD … ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION Plaintiff, TO TRANSFER VENUE 14 v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownGasnik v. State Farm Insurance
825 F. Supp. 245 · District Court, E.D. California · Aug 24, 1992
ZELE-NY, to, raise the limits of their insurance $1,000,000.00 across the board. ■ Defendant, HOWARD W. … This requirement was upheld in Gibbs v. Home Ins.
Cited 13 timesPublished
Ask Donna