Case law

Goldberg v. Ellett (In Re Ellett)

301 B.R. 570 · District Court, E.D. California · Oct 24, 2003

Appellant Gerald Goldberg (“Goldberg”) Executive Director of the Franchise Tax Board (“FTB”), appeals the Bankruptcy Court’s Order denying his motion to dismiss adversary proceedings filed by Debt- or and Appellee, James … Texas v. Walker, 142 F.3d at 820. The Ninth Circuit’s decision in Goldberg v.

Board of Trustees of the Kern County Electrical Workers' Pension Fund v. Trinity Construction Enterprises, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California · Apr 29, 2025

of Trustees of the Kern County Electrical Workers’ Pension 23 Fund, Board of Trustees of the Kern County Electrical Workers’ Health and Welfare Trust, 24 Board of Trustees of the Kern County Electrical Journeyman and … See U.S. ex rel. 9 Schwartz v. TRW, Inc., 211 F.R.D. 388, 392 (C.D.

Dolores Huerta Foundation v. Panama-Buena Vista Union School District

District Court, E.D. California · Dec 8, 2022

The PBVUSD Board provided just 24-hours notice of these meetings and failed 20 to disclose the subject matter of the closed session as required by the Brown Act—a California 21 law limiting private meetings by government … The PBVUSD and the PBVUSD 1 by California’s Brown Act. Id. ¶¶ 18, 39 & 42.

Kendall v. Standard Insurance

17 F. Supp. 2d 1128 · District Court, E.D. California · Aug 14, 1998

See Shannon, 965 F.2d at 551 (inability of governmental entities to remove Board members is a factor in determining applicability of governmental plan exception). 4 The Board Members serve two-year terms and the Board meets … See Livolsi v.

(HC) Alvarado v. FBOP-USP-Atwater

District Court, E.D. California · Jan 24, 2020

See, e.g., 10 Brown v. United States, 610 F.2d 672, 677 (9th Cir. 1990); Capaldi v. Pontesso, 135 F.3d 1122, 11 1123 (6th Cir. 1998); Kingsley v. … Brown v. Rison, 895 F.2d 533, 535 (9th Cir. 6 1990). Thus, “because exhaustion is not required by statute, it is not jurisdictional.” Id.

Wright v. Southern Mono Hospital District

631 F. Supp. 1294 · District Court, E.D. California · Apr 1, 1986

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2707 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia, 427 U.S. 307, 312 , 96 S.Ct. 2562, 2566 , 49 L.Ed.2d 520 (1976).

Flores v. Merced Irrigation District

758 F. Supp. 2d 986 · District Court, E.D. California · Dec 9, 2010

See E.E.O.C. v. … Xin Liu v.

Gordon v. Vasquez

859 F. Supp. 413 · District Court, E.D. California · Jul 25, 1994

Brown v. Vasquez, 952 F.2d 1164, 1169 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 1778 , 118 L.Ed.2d 435 (1992). 15 What is true of the federal judiciary is, a fortiori, true for the national legislature. … Brown, 952 F.2d at 1165-69 . Both the Local Rule and Brown were vindicated in McFarland, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2568 (1994). 16 .

Froyd v. Cook

681 F. Supp. 669 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 15, 1988

See also Adcock v. Board of Education, 10 Cal.3d 60 (1973). … Brown, 63 Cal.2d 841, 845 , 48 Cal.Rptr. 609 , 409 P.2d 689 (1966), nonetheless, the starting place for a court’s construction of a California statute is the language used. People ex rel. Woods v.

(HC) Barnes v. Supreme Court Judges

District Court, E.D. California · Oct 21, 2021

See Fry v. Melaragno, 939 F.2d 832, 836 (9th Cir. 1991) 6 (Judges performing within the course and scope of their judicial duties are granted absolute 7 immunity); Brown v. … California Dep't of Corr., 554 F.3d 747, 751 (9th Cir. 2009) (“[P]arole 8 board members are entitled to absolute immunity for parole board decisions.”) See also 9 Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal & Corr.

Castillo v. The Well Community Church

District Court, E.D. California · Jun 22, 2023

United States v. Martin, 2 278 F.3d 988, 999 (9th Cir. 2002) (quoting Weil v. Inv. … Griffith v. Davis, 26 161 F.R.D. 687, 698 (C.D.

Board of Trustees of the Kern County Electrical Workers Health & Welfare Trust v. McCaa

District Court, E.D. California · Feb 15, 2024

Hilao v. … United States v. Feldman, 324 F. Supp. 2d 1112, 3 1116 (C.D. Cal. 2004) (quoting Imperial Bank v. Pim Elec., Inc., 33 Cal. App.4th 540, 547 4 (1995)).

(PC) Palomar v. Newsom

District Court, E.D. California · Jan 6, 2025

See Taylor v. … See George v. Smith, 507 F.3d 605, 609 (7th Cir. 2007). Plaintiff alleges 19 only that defendant Brown refused to process his medical chronos appeal and this single 20 allegation is insufficient to state any claim.

County of Stanislaus v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

142 F. Supp. 3d 1065 · District Court, E.D. California · Nov 5, 2015

In 2009, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (“CRWQCB”) issued an order identifying plaintiffs “Waste Discharge Requirements.” (Id.) … (Brown Deck ¶¶ 1-6 (Docket No. 32-9).) Mr. Brown’s paralegal explains that, in January 2012, she located a reference to the insurance policy in a correspondence from 1975 between the City and plaintiff and that Mr.

KIM-C1, LLC v. Valent Biosciences Corp.

756 F. Supp. 2d 1258 · District Court, E.D. California · Nov 22, 2010

Brown’s testimony concludes by saying the issue is how Valent goes nonexclusive. … In the reply brief, Valent cites another portion of Brown's testimony.

Bryant v. Matvieshen

904 F. Supp. 2d 1034 · District Court, E.D. California · Oct 15, 2012

Entertainment 2000, Inc. v. Rock Star Videos, Inc., 444 F.Supp.2d 1012, 1049 (C.D.Cal.2006), citations omitted; Aurora World, Inc. v. … See Sleep Science Partners v.

American River Trees, et al. v. Central Valley Protection Board, et al.

District Court, E.D. California · Nov 20, 2025

Attorneys Matthew Struhar and Isabella Panicucci appeared on behalf of 24 Defendant Central Valley Flood Protection Board (“Flood Board”). … On July 18, 2025, Defendant Flood Board certified the 2025 Final SEIS/SEIR pursuant to 17 CEQA. (Doc. No. 20-15.) Defendant Flood Board issued its notice of determination on July 18, 18 2025. (Doc.

Merced Irrigation District v. County of Mariposa

941 F. Supp. 2d 1237 · District Court, E.D. California · Apr 23, 2013

Laborers Vacation Trust (“Franchise Tax Board ”), 463 U.S. 1, 9 , 103 S.Ct. 2841 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983)); see also Nevada v. Bank of Am. Corp., 672 F.3d 661, 674 (9th Cir.2012). … Local Agency is defined in § 6252(a) as including a county or any board, commission, or agency thereof. . See, e.g., Center for Biological Diversity v.

Cal-Almond, Inc. v. Yeutter

756 F. Supp. 1351 · District Court, E.D. California · Feb 14, 1991

Defendants are the Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture (“Secretary”), the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) and the Almond Board of California (“Board”). … Winter v.

Pagano v. Oroville Hospital

93 Daily Journal DAR 2776 · District Court, E.D. California · Feb 2, 1993

Board of Trustees, Etc. v. Superior Court, 119 Cal.App.3d 516, 526 , 174 Cal.Rptr. 160, 164-165 (1981). 1. … Board of Medical Quality, Etc. v.