Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,021 results
2.32s
District Court, E.D. California · Apr 8, 2026
Dittman v. California, 191 F.3d 1020, 1025 (9th 12 Cir. 1999). … Dittman, 191 F.3d at 1025–26 (citing Atascadero State Hosp. v. Scanlon, 473 U.S. 18 234, 241 (1985)); see also Brown v. Cal.
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnited States v. Universal Life Church
114 B.R. 246 · District Court, E.D. California · Apr 4, 1990
No. 595 at 121, reprinted in 1978 U.S.Code Cong. & Ad.News at 6082; and to maintain the status quo, Roach, 660 F.2d at 1319 ; United States v. Sayres, 43 B.R. 437, 439 (W.D.N.Y.1984); United Mutual Savings Bank v. … Code Cong. & Ad.News 6086-87, 6298; see Roach, 660 F.2d at 1318 ; Brown v. Pennsylvania State Employees Credit Union (In re Brown) 49 B.R. 558, 561 (Bankr.M.D.Penn.1985).
Cited 2 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. California · Oct 14, 2020
Daniels-Hall v. National Educ. Ass’n, 629 F.3d 992, 998 18 (9th Cir. 2010); Sanders v. Brown, 504 F.3d 903, 910 (9th Cir. 2007); Schneider v. … See Brown v. California 11 Dept. of Corrections, 554 F.3d 747, 752 (9th Cir. 2009) (finding CDCR as agency of State of 12 California enjoys immunity from suit conferred by the Eleventh Amendment).
Cited 0 timesUnknownMontoya v. SANGER UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST., ETC.
502 F. Supp. 209 · District Court, E.D. California · Oct 29, 1980
Jimenez’ recommendation that Joshua be expelled, and accordingly recommended such action to the Board of Trustees, the governing body of the high school. … Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565, 584 , 95 S.Ct. 729, 741 , 42 L.Ed.2d 725, 740 .
Cited 6 timesPublishedCoalition for a Sustainable Delta v. Federal Emergency Management Agency
711 F. Supp. 2d 1152 · District Court, E.D. California · May 10, 2010
In the case of a corporation with no “members,” any action requiring a vote shall only require the approval of the board. Id. § 7310(b)(1). … The corporation’s board of director’s may, in its discretion, admit individuals to one or more classes of nonvoting members; the class or classes shall have such rights and obligations as the board finds appropriate. *1170
Cited 8 timesPublished286 F. Supp. 33 · District Court, E.D. California · Jul 10, 1968
It is my opinion that Referee Brown correctly interpreted the law in this case. … However, it is the rule in this Circuit that such a statement substantially complies with the requirements of § 1263(4) (See: Curzon v. Dulgarian, 9 Cir., 287 F.2d 30 ; and Samuels v. Delucchi, 9 Cir., 286 F.2d 504 ). .
Cited 0 timesPublishedCounty of Inyo v. Department of the Interior
873 F. Supp. 2d 1232 · District Court, E.D. California · Jun 6, 2012
[Smith v. … Board of Supervisors passed Resolution No. 56-51.
Cited 4 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. California · May 16, 2025
See Brown v. … Martinez v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownExxonmobil Oil Corp. v. Nicoletti Oil, Inc.
713 F. Supp. 2d 1105 · District Court, E.D. California · May 18, 2010
On or about February 3, 2005, the Regional Board issued Cleanup and Abatement Order No. … The Regional Board approved Plaintiffs scope of work. (FAC at 13). Nicoletti declined to allow the further testing of the fuel system proposed by Plaintiff and approved by the Regional Board. (FAC at 13).
Cited 1 timesPublished569 F. Supp. 1513 · District Court, E.D. California · Sep 7, 1983
The National Film Board of Canada has so registered. … On January 13, 1983, defendants notified the National Film Board of Canada that a determination had been made that the films were “political propaganda,” and that the Film Board must make the § 4 label “a part of the film
Cited 6 timesPublished639 F. Supp. 554 · District Court, E.D. California · Jul 2, 1986
He is a fellow of the American College of Surgeons, President of the Tehama County Medical Society, and one of two board-certified general surgeons currently serving the Tehama County area. … Weinberger v. Romero-Barcelo, 456 U.S. 305, 312 , 102 S.Ct. 1798, 1803 , 72 L.Ed.2d 91 (1982). The limited record usually available on such motions renders a final decision on the merits inappropriate. Brown v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedPeople of State of Cal. v. Reyes
816 F. Supp. 619 · District Court, E.D. California · Nov 10, 1992
For example, other school boards and school board superintendents will learn of this incident and would be discouraged from using CRS. … Touhy v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedHorizon West Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
214 F. Supp. 2d 1074 · District Court, E.D. California · Apr 9, 2002
of yours or any similar board of yours while this agreement is in effect; • the actions of those charged with carrying out such board or committee directives while this agreement is in effect. … Group, Inc. v. Hosp.
Cited 2 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. California · Dec 11, 2024
In June 2022, he was attacked by an Americans with 19 Disabilities Act (“ADA”) worker, inmate Brown. Plaintiff submitted a complaint about Brown 20 under the ADA. … This 1 close proximity in time is enough to raise an inference that Plaintiff’s protected activity of 2 complaining about Brown caused the retaliatory action. See Pratt v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Aug 7, 2026
Hunt v. County of Orange, 672 F.3d 606, 616 (9th Cir. 2012) (quoting Avila v. 14 Willits Envtl. … See Diaz v. 7 American Tel. & Tel., 752 F.2d 1356, 1364 (9th Cir. 1985); see also Goold v. Hilton 8 Worldwide, Inc., Case No.: 1:13-cv-00438 JLT, at *6 n.2 (E.D. Cal.
Cited 0 timesUnknownHardesty v. Sacramento Metro. Air Quality Mgmt. Dist.
307 F. Supp. 3d 1010 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 31, 2018
."); Gilchrist v. … V.
Cited 1 timesPublishedFlores v. Merced Irrigation District
758 F. Supp. 2d 986 · District Court, E.D. California · Dec 9, 2010
See E.E.O.C. v. … Xin Liu v.
Cited 3 timesPublished681 F. Supp. 669 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 15, 1988
See also Adcock v. Board of Education, 10 Cal.3d 60 (1973). … Brown, 63 Cal.2d 841, 845 , 48 Cal.Rptr. 609 , 409 P.2d 689 (1966), nonetheless, the starting place for a court’s construction of a California statute is the language used. People ex rel. Woods v.
Cited 15 timesPublished107 F. Supp. 3d 1056 · District Court, E.D. California · Jul 25, 2014
There is no direct person-to-person transmission of infection.’ ” Plata v. Brown, 2013 WL 3200587 , *2 (N.D.Cal. June 24, 2013) (quoting court medical expert report). … Plata v. Brown, No. C01-1351 TEH, 2013 WL 3200587 , at *10 (N.D.Cal. June 24, 2013).
Cited 5 timesPublished
Ask Donna