Case law

Phoebe Dacha v. Medical Board of California and Reji Varghese

District Court, E.D. California · Jan 7, 2026

The Medical Board of California is a state agency to which the Eleventh Amendment 10 applies. Yoonessi v. Albany Med. Ctr., 352 F. Supp. 2d 1096, 1104 (C.D. … This court 28 cannot use the writ of mandamus to compel the California Medical Board to alter its records or 1 reports regarding plaintiff. See Demos v. United States Dist.

(PC) Johnson v. Warden

District Court, E.D. California · May 14, 2025

Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997). Instead, the plaintiff 26 must “demonstrate that, through its deliberate conduct, the municipality was the ‘moving force’ 27 behind the injury alleged.” Id. … Christie v.

Ogonowski

District Court, E.D. California · Apr 16, 2026

See 15 Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). … See Bd. of County Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 26 397, 403 (1997). Thus, municipal liability must rest on the actions of the municipality, and not of 27 the actions of its employees or officers. See id.

Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. v. Geithner

715 F. Supp. 2d 1051 · District Court, E.D. California · May 21, 2010

v. … Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954).

United States v. Sterling Centrecorp Inc.

209 F. Supp. 3d 1151 · District Court, E.D. California · Sep 20, 2016

The Board proceeded to issue a series of orders giving priority to copper mining. Gold mines were classified as nonessential and given the lowest priority rating. See United States v. … FMC Corp. v.

Marroquin v. Pfizer, Inc.

367 F. Supp. 3d 1152 · District Court, E.D. California · Feb 14, 2019

See Brown v. Superior Ct. , 44 Cal.3d 1049 , 1069 & n.12, 245 Cal.Rptr. 412 , 751 P.2d 470 (1988) ; Trejo v. Johnson & Johnson , 13 Cal.App.5th 110 , 144, 220 Cal.Rptr.3d 127 (2017) ; Garrett v. … Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. , 53 Cal.3d 987 , 995, 281 Cal.Rptr. 528 , 810 P.2d 549 (1991) (describing Brown v. Superior Ct. , 44 Cal.3d 1049 , 1069, 245 Cal.Rptr. 412 , 751 P.2d 470 (1988) ); Garrett v.

(PC) Williams v. Unknown

District Court, E.D. California · Jan 6, 2022

For 27 this reason, the undersigned cannot determine whether plaintiff has stated a potentially colorable 28 retaliation claim against defendants Brown and Johnson. Ivey v. … Rhodes v.

(PS) Olson v. Hornbrook Community Services District

District Court, E.D. California · Mar 4, 2024

Plan v. Knoebber, 244 F.3d 691, 696 (9th Cir. 2001). … See 20 Bateman v.

Altman v. HO SPORTS CO., INC.

821 F. Supp. 2d 1178 · District Court, E.D. California · May 18, 2011

See Simmons v. Navajo County, 609 F.3d 1011, 1017 (9th Cir.2010); Gordon v. Virtumundo, Inc., 575 F.3d 1040, 1058 (9th Cir.2009); Southern Cal. Gas Co. v. City of Santa Ana, 336 F.3d 885 , 889 (9th Cir.2003); Carmen v. … Campbell v. General Motors Corp., 32 Cal.3d 112, 119 , 184 Cal.Rptr. 891 , 649 P.2d 224 (1982); Visueta v.

Natural Resources Defense Council v. Kempthorne

621 F. Supp. 2d 954 · District Court, E.D. California · Apr 27, 2009

[United States v. State Water Resources Control Board, supra, 182 Cal.App.3d at p. 99 , 227 Cal.Rptr. 161 .] … In O’Neill v.

Thomsen v. Georgia-Pacific Corrugated, LLC

190 F. Supp. 3d 959 · District Court, E.D. California · Jun 2, 2016

Relying on King v. … Schechner v.

Cruz

District Court, E.D. California · Oct 1, 2025

Council v. Cal. … California, 191 F.3d 1020, 1025–26 (9th Cir. 1999) (citing 14 Atascadero State Hosp. v. Scanlon, 473 U.S. 234, 241 (1985)); see Brown v. Cal.

(PC) Perrotte v. Johnson

District Court, E.D. California · Oct 3, 2019

Moreover, Plaintiff cannot establish that the 128-B caused 8 Governor Brown to reverse the Board’s decision to grant Plaintiff parole. … The 128-B was only one of 9 many factors considered by Governor Brown in rendering his decision. Cf. Nettles v.

Fobbs v. Holy Cross Health System Corp.

789 F. Supp. 1054 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 16, 1992

Plaintiff subsequently appealed this decision to the Appeal Board of the Board of Trustees (hereinafter “Appeal Board”). … In that case, Austin v.

Upjohn Co. v. Hygieia Biological Laboratories

151 F.R.D. 355 · District Court, E.D. California · Apr 28, 1993

Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Richard A. Glass Co., 175 Cal.App.3d 703 , 221 Cal.Rptr. 63, 69-70 (1985), Tomay v. United States, 840 F.2d 1424, 1426 (9th Cir.1988). … Bag Software v.

Western States Petroleum Assoc. v. CA Occupational Health and Safety Standards Board

District Court, E.D. California · Nov 26, 2019

See Citizens for Balanced Use v. … V. Mendonca, 13 152 F.3d 1184, 1190 (9th Cir. 1998).

(PC) Jones v. Payan

District Court, E.D. California · Jun 16, 2025

Brown, (4) A. Payan, (5) A. 16 D’Andrade, and (6) P. Mascote. See ECF No. 1, pg. 5. … See 24 Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982).

California v. Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation District

411 F. Supp. 361 · District Court, E.D. California · Aug 8, 1975

The FPC, through its Secretary, directed that the Board of Consultants be again convened and on December 7, 1971, the Board of Consultants issued its third report. … First Iowa Hydro-Electric Coop. v. Federal Power Commission, 328 U.S. 152 , 66 S.Ct. 906 , 90 L.Ed. 1143 (1946).

Board of Trustees of IBEW Local 100 Pension Trust Fund v. Trinity Construction Enterprises, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California · Feb 7, 2025

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BOARD … Hallett v. 28 Morgan, 296 F.3d 732, 751 (9th Cir. 2002).

Cisneros

District Court, E.D. California · Nov 7, 2025

Brown, the hearing official, 17 threatened Plaintiff with C-Status and loss of property if Plaintiff did not plead guilty to the RVR. 18 Defendants C. Brown, T. Dunn, M. Valdez, and D. … Gov’t Code § 900.6. 1 Brown v. Ransweiler, 171 Cal. App. 4th 516, 526 (2009). Where the defendant is a peace officer, 2 the plaintiff must also prove that the use of force was unreasonable. Ransweiler, 171 Cal.