Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,021 results
2.08s
California Earthquake Authority v. Metropolitan West Securities, LLC
285 F.R.D. 585 · District Court, E.D. California · Aug 1, 2012
In a subsequent e-mail to board members, Mr. … Allied Irish Bank v. Bank of America, N.A., 240 F.R.D. 96 (S.D.N.Y.2007).
Cited 3 timesPublished599 F. Supp. 2d 1197 · District Court, E.D. California · Jan 30, 2009
See Davis v. … v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedJustin Marcus Zinman v. California Board of Parole Hearings
District Court, E.D. California · Apr 23, 2026
See Savarese v. Edrick Transfer & Storage, Inc., 513 F.2d 140, 146 (9th Cir. 1975); 2 | Martella v. Marine Cooks & Stewards Union, Seafarers Int'l Union of N. … See, e.g., Al-Khafaji v. Koenig, 7 | 2021 WL 6126930, at *3 (N.D. Cal.
Cited 0 timesUnknown635 F. Supp. 2d 1166 · District Court, E.D. California · Apr 9, 2009
Dep’t. of Corr. v. Thompson, 490 U.S. 454, 460 , 109 S.Ct. 1904 , 104 L.Ed.2d 506 (1989). In the parole context, due process requires that parole board decisions are supported by “some evidence.” … See, e.g., Irons v. Carey, 505 F.3d 846, 851 (9th Cir.2007); Sass v. Cal. Bd. of Prison Terms, 461 F.3d 1123, 1129 (9th Cir.2006); Biggs v. Terhune, 334 F.3d 910, 915 (9th Cir.2003); McQuillion, 306 F.3d at 904 .
Cited 3 timesPublishedGranville H. Marshall, Jr. v. The Medical Board of California
District Court, E.D. California · May 7, 2026
MARSHALL, Jr., No. 2:25-cv-01928-TLN-SCR 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. … See, e.g., Baker v. IC Sys., Inc., No. CV-08-8091- PCT-DGC, 2008 WL 4186166, at 1 (D. 2 Ariz.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMcClellan Ecological Seepage Situation v. Weinberger
707 F. Supp. 1182 · District Court, E.D. California · Jun 20, 1988
EPA v. California ex rel. State Water Resources Control Board, 426 U.S. 200 , 96 S.Ct. 2022 , 48 L.Ed.2d 578 (1976). … As the First Circuit stated in Romero-Barcelo v. Brown, 643 F.2d 835 , 854 n. 36 (1981), reversed on other grounds sub nom. Weinberger v.
Vacated on other grounds by McClellan Ecological Seepage Situation v. Perry, 47 F.3d 325 (1995)Cited 29 timesPublished340 F. Supp. 313 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 3, 1972
Defendant cites Crowley v. … Did not return C.O. form to local board until 8-31-70. 3. Personal appearance before board 2-11-70 and did not mention C.O. 4.
Cited 0 timesPublished(PS) Gifford v. Hornbrook Fire Protection District
District Court, E.D. California · Mar 27, 2025
Count V - Civil Count IX - Violation of 42 U.S.C. 1985 as to HFPD, Board 8 conspiracy in Defendants. (First Amended Complaint) See ECF No. 23, pgs. 25-26. … injunctive relief and should proceed. 1 Count V - Negligence as to Board Despite being granted leave to amend, Defendants. See id. at 33-34.
Cited 0 timesUnknown665 F. Supp. 2d 1179 · District Court, E.D. California · Oct 23, 2009
Irons v. Carey, 505 F.3d 846, 851 (9th Cir.2007). … The Effect of Biggs v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States v. State of Cal.
529 F. Supp. 303 · District Court, E.D. California · Jan 4, 1982
Western Casualty and Surety Co. v. Teel, 391 F.2d 764 (10th Cir. 1968), Maryland Casualty Co. v. Faulkner, 126 F.2d 175 (6th Cir. 1942), Chicago Metallic Mfg. Co. v. … Carpenter v.
Cited 3 timesPublished280 F. Supp. 651 · District Court, E.D. California · Feb 28, 1968
McCollum v. Board of Education, etc., 333 U.S. 203 , 68 S.Ct. 461 , 92 L.Ed. 649 (1948)). … West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnett, 319 U.S. 624 , 63 S.Ct. 1178 , 87 L.Ed. 1628 (1943). The student plaintiffs here remain silent during the ceremony.
Cited 10 timesPublished747 F. Supp. 2d 1200 · District Court, E.D. California · Oct 6, 2010
Hess v. Board of Parole and PosP-Prison Supervision, 514 F.3d 909, 913-14 (9th Cir.2008). … See Pirtle v. California Board of Prison Terms, 611 F.3d 1015, 1025 (9th Cir.2010); see also Rico v. Curry, 2010 WL 3081297 (N.D.Cal.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRounds v. The Board of Trustees of the California State University
District Court, E.D. California · Apr 17, 2020
Case No. 1:20-cv-00170-AWI-SAB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS 13 v. … Bautista v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownYosemite Tenants Ass'n. v. Clark
582 F. Supp. 1342 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 22, 1984
The Ninth Circuit stated in N.L.R.B. v. … Larry P. v. Riles, 502 F.2d 963, 965 (9th Cir.1974); Washington Capitols Basketball Club, Ind. v. Barry, 419 F.2d 472 , 476 (9th Cir.1969); Tanner Motor Livery, Ltd. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCountry National Bank v. Mayer
788 F. Supp. 1136 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 30, 1992
The board rejected these demands. … In Koshaba v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedS. Cal. Alliance of Publicly Owned Treatment Works v. U.S. Envtl. Prot. Agency
297 F. Supp. 3d 1060 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 17, 2018
petition to the Environmental Appeals Board...is, under 5 U.S.C. § 704 , a prerequisite to seeking judicial review of the final agency action."); SCAP v. … Water Code §§ 13320 , 13321, 13330 (review and petition for stay by state board, and review in superior court); SCAP v.
Cited 1 timesPublished746 F. Supp. 2d 1150 · District Court, E.D. California · Oct 13, 2010
Sass v. California Board of Prison Terms, 461 F.3d 1123, 1127 (9th Cir.2006). As recognized by the Supreme Court in Jago v. … Pirtle v. California Board of Prison Terms, 611 F.3d 1015 (9th Cir.2010).
Cited 0 timesPublished(PS) Gifford v. Hornbrook Fire Protection District
District Court, E.D. California · Sep 14, 2021
15 on January 22, 2016 violated the Brown Act. … Then-president of 16 the board, Woodrow Mattingly, responded in writing that HFPD would cease all Brown Act 17 violations. ECF Nos. 48-1 at 25; 49 at 2, 8.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSouth Yuba River Citizens League v. National Marine Fisheries Service
804 F. Supp. 2d 1045 · District Court, E.D. California · Jul 26, 2011
Tennessee Valley Authority v. … In Thomas v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedHill v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.
944 F. Supp. 2d 943 · District Court, E.D. California · May 10, 2013
The Advisory Boards ... were created to obtain and then disseminate accurate evidence regarding [ONJ].” … .”); McDowell v. Brown, 392 F.3d 1283, 1295 (11th Cir.2004) (“Some state evidentiary rules are substantive in nature, and transcend the substance-procedure boundary, creating a potential Erie conflict.”)
Cited 8 timesPublished
Ask Donna