Case law

(PS) Bynum v. County of Siskiyou Board of Supervisors

District Court, E.D. California · Feb 21, 2020

Gaus v. … Co. v.

Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Goldstene

843 F. Supp. 2d 1071 · District Court, E.D. California · Dec 29, 2011

(citing Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. New York State Liquor Auth., 476 U.S. 573, 579 , 106 S.Ct. 2080 , 90 L.Ed.2d 552 (1986)). … Brown, 476 U.S. at 582 , 106 S.Ct. 2080 .

Aizuss v. Commonwealth Equity Trust

847 F. Supp. 1482 · District Court, E.D. California · Dec 21, 1993

See Menowitz v. Brown, 991 F.2d 36, 42 (2d Cir.1993); Maggio v. Gerard Freezer & Ice Co., 824 F.2d 123, 128-29 (1st Cir.1987); Gaudin v. KDI Corp., 576 F.2d 708, 712 (6th Cir.1978). … See Mir v.

Conference of Fed. Sav. & Loan Associations v. Stein

495 F. Supp. 12 · District Court, E.D. California · Nov 2, 1979

Schott v. Mission Federal Savings and Loan Association, et al., Civ. 75-366-WMB, U.S.D.C. C.D.Cal., the Bank Board issued an Advisory opinion (Bank Board Resolution No. 75-647; hereinafter the “Schott Opinion”). … Glendale Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Fox, 459 F.Supp. 903 (C.D. Cal.1978) and Nalore v. San Diego Federal Savings and Loan Association, Civil No. 77-0660-N. See also, Ray v.

Duran v. Castro

227 F. Supp. 2d 1121 · District Court, E.D. California · Oct 18, 2002

See Andrade v. Attorney General of the State of California, 270 F.3d 743 (9th Cir.2001); Brown v. Mayle, 283 F.3d 1019 (9th Cir. 2002). … Andrade, 270 F.3d at 748 ; see also Brown, 283 F.3d at 1021 .

Occupy Fresno v. County of Fresno

835 F. Supp. 2d 849 · District Court, E.D. California · Dec 13, 2011

In Brown v. … The reasoning of Brown is persuasive.

FORT INDEPENDENCE INDIAN COMMUNITY v. California

679 F. Supp. 2d 1159 · District Court, E.D. California · Dec 24, 2009

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 132-33 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000)) (internal citations omitted). … See Dolan v.

I.K. Ex Rel. E.K. v. Sylvan Union School District

681 F. Supp. 2d 1179 · District Court, E.D. California · Jan 20, 2010

Brown and Giron were under contract with SUSD to perform the observation and assessment. During Brown and Giron’s visit they assisted Barries in removing I.K. from his classroom to a school assembly. … I.K. escaped their grasp and put water on Brown and Giron with his water bottle. I.K. then took off his shirt. Brown and Giron instructed I.K. to put on his shirt but he refused and took off his pants as well.

Cunningham v. Kramer

178 F. Supp. 3d 999 · District Court, E.D. California · Apr 15, 2016

Martinez v. Stanford, 323 F.3d 1178, 1184 (9th Cir.2003). Defendants cannot be held liable for a violation of a right that is not clearly established at the time the violation occurred. Brown v. … Smith v. Brown, No. 1:12-cv-0238-AWI-JLT (PC), 2012 WL 1574651 , at *4 (May 3, 2012) (allegation that inmate was African-American is insufficient to state a claim); Harvey v. Gonzalez, No.

Bhan v. NME Hospitals, Inc.

669 F. Supp. 998 · District Court, E.D. California · Sep 16, 1987

Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 324 , 82 S.Ct. 1502, 1523 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962). … Brown v. Baden, 815 F.2d 575, 576 (9th Cir.1987). 3 . The approach taken by the Supreme Court seems to distinguish the handling of inferences in antitrust cases from all others.

Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Goldstene

719 F. Supp. 2d 1170 · District Court, E.D. California · Jun 16, 2010

Gade v. … Brown, Jr., in his official capacity as California Attorney General. 2 .

(PC) McClung v. CA Board of State and Community Corrections

District Court, E.D. California · Jan 19, 2024

Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). 16 II. … ,” Ivey v.

(PS) Chapa v. Natomas Park Master Association Board of Directors

District Court, E.D. California · Oct 25, 2023

(quoting 17 Yourish v. California Amplifier, 191 F.3d 983, 990 (9th Cir. 1999)). … Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9" Cir. 22 | 1998); Martinez v.

King v. Stanislaus Consolidated Fire Protection District

985 F. Supp. 1228 · District Court, E.D. California · Nov 7, 1997

Norris v. … See Diaz v.

Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Corey

258 F. Supp. 3d 1134 · District Court, E.D. California · Jun 16, 2017

See Warth, 422 U.S. at 515-16 , 95 S.Ct. 2191; Brown Group, 517 U.S. at 554 , 116 S.Ct. 1529 . 3. … There is no across-the-board benefit to California producers, nor is there any across-the-board burden to out-of-state producers. *1159 The Court is unable to locate, and the parties do not provide, any case that is factually

Bingham v. Hamilton

100 F. Supp. 2d 1233 · District Court, E.D. California · May 15, 2000

In Peel v. … Similarly, in Ibanez v.

(PS) Chapa v. Natomas Park Master Association Board of Directors

District Court, E.D. California · Dec 20, 2023

ORDER 14 NATOMAS PARK MASTER ASSOCIATION BOARD OF 15 DIRECTORS, et al., … See Orand v. United States, 24 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 25 de novo. See Robbins v.

Black Parallel School Board v. Sacramento City Unified School District

District Court, E.D. California · Jul 29, 2022

Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 706-07 (1997) (citing Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 27 248)(1936)). … For Further Extension of Stay of Litigation & Order □□□□ Black Parallel School Board et al. v. SC USD et al., Case No. 2:19-cv-01768-TLN-KJN

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Nalbandian Sales, Inc.

36 F. Supp. 2d 1206 · District Court, E.D. California · Apr 20, 1998

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., 879 F.2d 1304, 1313 (6th Cir.1989) (The purpose of the prohibition against retaliation under Title VII is to “protect access to machinery available to seek redress for civil rights violations … No. 127 (1970) (simply because employee was related to individuals who testified at Board meeting is insufficient without more to assert a retaliation claim).

Sacramento County Retired Employees Ass'n v. County of Sacramento

975 F. Supp. 2d 1150 · District Court, E.D. California · Sep 30, 2013

Courts have taken judicial notice of a Board of Supervisors’ resolution and of administrative decisions. Merced Irrigation Dist. v. … Anderson v.