Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,021 results
2.49s
District Court, E.D. California · Feb 7, 2025
Hernandez v. … Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982).
Cited 0 timesUnknown(PC) Jones v. Placer County Sheriff's Office
District Court, E.D. California · Oct 8, 2019
Johnson v. … Johnson v. 5 California State Board of Accountancy, 72 F.3d 1427, 1430, 1433 (9th Cir. 1995); Sports Form, 6 Inc. v. United Press International, 686 F.2d 750, 753 (9th Cir. 1982).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Mar 27, 2020
Jennings v. Price, 2018 WL 2684161, *2 (E.D. Cal. … Board of 16 Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). 17 Finally, plaintiff is informed that the court cannot refer to a prior pleading in order to 18 make plaintiff’s amended complaint
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Oct 20, 2020
Where appropriate, a California prisoner may pursue a state tort action after he has 28 complied with the claim requirements of the State Board of Control. … Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). 19 A FAC will be screened by the court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.
Cited 0 timesUnknown(SS) Isiah v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, E.D. California · Mar 3, 2020
See Brown-Hunter v. 4 Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 495 (9th Cir. 2015) (remanding for an award of benefits is appropriate in 5 rare circumstances). See also Lewin v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 495 (citations omitted).
Cited 0 timesUnknown(SS) Caglia v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, E.D. California · Oct 15, 2019
Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 23 268 (9th Cir. 1982). … See Hishon v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Aug 18, 2020
, formerly known as the State 26 Board of Control, no more than six months after the cause of action accrues. … Wilkerson v. 23 Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Baxter v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown(SS) Caglia v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, E.D. California · Mar 3, 2020
Denton v. … Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 18 268 (9th Cir. 1982).
Cited 0 timesUnknown(PC) Velarde v. Chico Police Dept.
District Court, E.D. California · Apr 4, 2023
See 18 Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). 19 II. … Ivey v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Sep 24, 2019
See Lee v. … Id.; Sanchez v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Oct 10, 2023
Doe I v. … See Ivey v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown(SS) Barone v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, E.D. California · Jul 9, 2020
Magallanes v. Bowen, 881 F.2d 747, 750 (9th Cir. 13 1989). “[A] federal court’s review of Social Security determinations is quite limited.” Brown- 14 Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2015). … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492 (quoting Treichler, 775 22 F.3d at 1098).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDelgadillo v. Fresno Police Department
District Court, E.D. California · Jun 2, 2025
Lopez v. … Jan. 9, 2015); Lopez 26 v. Youngblood, 609 F. Supp. 2d 1125, 1142 (E.D. Cal. 2009); Brown v. Cnty. of Kern, No. 1:06-cv- 27 00121-OWW-TAG, 2008 WL 544565, at *17 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2008).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · May 11, 2020
Jones v. Williams, 791 F.3d 1023, 1031 (9th Cir. 2015). A one-time 28 incident is not sufficient to meet that standard. See Brown v. Washington, 752 F. … Ivey v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownAnders v. California State University, Fresno
District Court, E.D. California · Mar 17, 2021
Cal. 2008), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. … LegalNet, Inc. v. 26 Davis, 673 F. Supp. 2d 1063, 1069 (C.D.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Jan 19, 2024
Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th 14 Cir. 1982). Rather, the plaintiff must set forth specific facts as to each individual defendant’s 15 causal role in the alleged constitutional deprivation. See Leer v. … See May v. Enomoto, 633 F.2d 17 164, 167 (9th Cir. 1980); Johnson v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Jul 15, 2020
Hebbe v. … See also Board of Pardons v. Allen, 482 13 U.S. 369, 107 S.Ct. 2415, 96 L.Ed.2d 303 (1987).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Jan 18, 2023
Reeb v. … (ECF No. 12 at 1.) 9 Although 28 U.S.C. § 2241 does not itself contain an exhaustion requirement, Brown v. 10 Rison, 895 F.2d 533, 535 (9th Cir. 1990), section 2241 petitioners are generally required to 11 exhaust
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Jun 27, 2025
Coleman v. … Plaintiff states that because of his filing, Defendants Ali and Olmedo, as well as J. 18 Gary, retaliated against Plaintiff by transferring him to housing that was “flooded with brown 19 poop, urine water.”
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna