Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscaed

9,021 results

1.26s

  • Doerer

    District Court, E.D. California · Oct 6, 2025

    Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 570–71 (1972). Plaintiff has not failed to 23 do so as he alleges only that his personal property was confiscated because of the prison “shake 24 down.” (ECF No. 1 at 8-9). … Brown v. USA Taekwondo, 483 P.3d 159, 164 (Cal. 2021) (quoting Nally v. 25 Grace Cmty.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Adams v. Chappell

    District Court, E.D. California · Nov 6, 2020

    In Tripp v. … See Thornton v. Brown, 757 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 2013) (absolute immunity does not bar 21 injunctive relief claim against parole unit supervisor); Buckwalter v. Nev. Bd. of Med.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Coleman v. Newsom

    District Court, E.D. California · Jun 2, 2020

    It is settled 22 that the Program Guide “‘is grounded in the requirements of the Eighth Amendment’” Coleman v. 23 Brown, 938 F.Supp.2d 955, 973 (E.D. … Cal. 2013) (internal citation omitted); see also Coleman v. 24 Brown, 756 Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Doerer

    District Court, E.D. California · Oct 7, 2025

    Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 570–71 (1972). Plaintiff has not failed to 27 do so as he alleges only that his personal property was confiscated because of the prison “shake 28 down.” (ECF No. 4 at 8-9). … Brown v. USA Taekwondo, 483 P.3d 159, 164 (Cal. 2021) (quoting Nally v. 28 Grace Cmty.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Bland v. Jennings

    District Court, E.D. California · Sep 12, 2022

    See Terrell v. Brewer, 935 24 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. … Brown to 22 produce for inspection and copying certain documents detailed therein.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) McKenna v. Cisneros

    District Court, E.D. California · Jun 22, 2023

    The undersigned dismissed the Eighth Amendment excessive force claims alleged 22 to have occurred on February 18, 2021 involving defendants Cisneros, Leahy, Garcia, Tyler, 23 Coronado, Sayama, Diaz, Brown, Dunn, Valdez … Martinez v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Garcia

    District Court, E.D. California · Nov 25, 2025

    They are 24 certified by the state of California via the medical board, making them state actors. … Dittman, 191 F.3d at 1025–26 (citing Atascadero State Hosp. v. Scanlon, 473 U.S. 16 234, 241 (1985)); see also Brown v. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Odbert v. United States

    576 F. Supp. 825 · District Court, E.D. California · Aug 31, 1983

    In Alyeska Pipeline Services Co. v. … See Browning Debenture Holders’ Committee v. Dass Corp., 560 F.2d 1078 (2d Cir.1977).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • (PC) Berumen v. Jones

    District Court, E.D. California · Jan 10, 2024

    The Court also determined that 25 Plaintiff’s remaining claims of excessive force by Defendant Jones and other claims against 26 Defendants Brown, Cameron, Arana, Valine, Stratton, Gocheva, and Lynch are insufficient. … See Martinez v. 18 | Yist, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 19 20 | Dated: January 9, 2024 = IS Co 21 DENNIS M.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Fonseca v. Kaiser Permanente Medical Center Roseville

    222 F. Supp. 3d 850 · District Court, E.D. California · May 13, 2016

    But see Pickup v. Brown, 740 F.3d 1208, 1235-36 (9th Cir.) … Welch v. Brown, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 2881 , 189 L.Ed.2d 833 (2014). It goes without saying that the right to life is fundamental.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • (PC) Browning v. Burkhart

    District Court, E.D. California · Jun 2, 2021

    , Case No. 1:21-cv-00041-HBK 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. … See 28 U.S.C. 25 § 1391(b)(1)-(2); see also Ziegler v. Indian River County, 64 F.3d 470, 474 (9th Cir. 1995) 26 (reviewing federal court jurisdiction and venue in a § 1983 action).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Kabir v. City of Elk Grove

    District Court, E.D. California · Jun 27, 2025

    Ashcroft v. … See Board of Cnty. Com’rs of Bryan Cnty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 2 397, 403–04 (1997).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Merritt v. Lewis

    309 F. Supp. 1249 · District Court, E.D. California · Jan 19, 1970

    See A Quantity of Copies of Books v. Kansas, supra; Marcus v. Search Warrants of Property etc., supra; United States v. Brown, 274 F.Supp. 561 (S.D.N.Y.1967); Evergreen Review, Inc. v. … See 208 Cinema v. Vergari, 5 Cr.L. 2395 (S.D.N.Y.1969); Bazzell v. Gibbens, 306 F.Supp. 1057 (E.D.La.1969); People v. De Renzy, 275 A.C.A. 419, 79 Cal.Rptr. 777 (1969); See also Rage Books, Inc. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • (PC) Johnson v. Warden

    District Court, E.D. California · Sep 26, 2023

    Bruns v. Nat’l Credit Union Admin., 122 F.3d 1251, 24 1257 (9th Cir. 1997) (quoting Ivey v. … See Graham v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brooklyn Brewery Corp. v. Black Ops Brewing, Inc.

    156 F. Supp. 3d 1173 · District Court, E.D. California · Jan 7, 2016

    CytoSport, Inc. v. Vital Pharm., Inc., 617 F.Supp.2d 1051, 1065 (E.D.Cal.2009). In AMF Inc. v. … Instead, its beers retail for less than $7.00 a bottle and consist of far less exotic fare; such as IPAs, browns, and reds. Significant differences in price decreases the likelihood of confusion. L.A. Gear, Inc. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • (PC) Carroll v. Vallejo Police Department

    District Court, E.D. California · Feb 10, 2023

    Warden 25 Pallares assigned ISU Sergeant Browne [not a defendant] to head the investigation, but Sgt. 26 Browne has also sexually assaulted several inmates. Sgt. … Browne is going around threatening 27 known victims and witnesses.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Luis Alberto Castro Felix v. Warden, California City Detention Center

    District Court, E.D. California · Jul 31, 2026

    Laing v. … Ward v. Chavez, 678 2 F.3d 1042, 1045 (9th Cir. 2012). Because exhaustion is not required by statute, it is not 3 jurisdictional. Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bueno

    District Court, E.D. California · Oct 30, 2025

    The District’s Governing Board is anticipated to consider this Agreement at a special board meeting, to be 27 scheduled between September 11, 2025 and September 20, 2025. b. … See Robidoux, 638 F.3d at 1181; 25 Salmeron v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PS) Warnken v. County of Solano

    District Court, E.D. California · Jun 24, 2025

    Id. 8 Under the First Amendment, city council and board meetings are considered 9 “limited public forums.” Norse v. … See McHenry v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Trevino v. Sheehan

    District Court, E.D. California · Feb 11, 2025

    Bruns v. Nat’l Credit Union Admin., 122 F.3d 1251, 20 1257 (9th Cir. 1997) (quoting Ivey v. Bd. of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982)). 21 II. … is, by contrast, a procedural one that focuses on whether the board 4 | fulfilled the requisite due process requirements in denying plaintiff parole.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.