Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscaed

9,021 results

1.48s

  • California v. Randtron

    69 F. Supp. 2d 1264 · District Court, E.D. California · Oct 12, 1999

    Ass’n v. … See Browning Debenture Holders’ Comm. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Payne v. Merced County Public Defender's Office

    District Court, E.D. California · Mar 22, 2023

    Wilkinson v. … Brown, No. CV2184472SJOASX, 2019 WL 2949029, at *4 (C.D. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Keith Darnell Johnson v. California Correctional Healthcare Services, et al.

    District Court, E.D. California · Feb 10, 2026

    Dittman, 191 F.3d at 1025–26 (citing Atascadero State 18 Hosp. v. Scanlon, 473 U.S. 234, 241 (1985)); see also Brown v. Cal. … Dep’t. of Corrs., 554 F.3d 19 747, 752 (9th Cir. 2009) (finding CDCR and California Board of Prison Terms entitled to 20 Eleventh Amendment immunity).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Goodell v. Ralphs Grocery Co.

    207 F. Supp. 2d 1124 · District Court, E.D. California · Jun 26, 2002

    Brown v. Lucky Stores, Inc., 246 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir.2001) (internal quotations omitted) (applying test articulated in Christiansburg Garment Co. v. … See Davis v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • (PC) Wilkins v. Barber

    District Court, E.D. California · Mar 23, 2023

    FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEENAN WILKINS, aka NERRAH No. 2:19-cv-1338 WBS KJN P BROWN … On March 2, 2023, plaintiff 24 asked the Court to take judicial notice of Woodson v. Sahota, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24104 (E.D. 25 Cal. Feb. 26, 2019). (ECF No. 273.) Defendants filed responses.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Infante

    District Court, E.D. California · Feb 18, 2026

    Id., Miller v. … See Krenwinkel, 6 2020 WL 7061033, at *2 (“Neither Graham nor Miller requires parole boards to give great 7 weight to a juvenile’s age as petitioner implies.”); Gray v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (SS) Rethwisch v. Commissioner of Social Security

    District Court, E.D. California · Jul 26, 2021

    Plaintiff, 15 STIPULATION AND ORDER v. … Pursuant to Astrue v. 9 Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2252-53 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on 10 whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the 11

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Gardner v. Vallejo Police Department

    District Court, E.D. California · Jun 11, 2020

    See 14 Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). … See Bd. of County 23 Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997). Thus, municipal liability must rest on the actions 24 of the municipality, and not of the actions of its employees or officers. See id.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sierra Club v. Eubanks

    335 F. Supp. 2d 1070 · District Court, E.D. California · Aug 27, 2004

    Citing Sierra Club v. … Brown, et al., Coarse Woody Debris and Succession in Recovering Forest, Attachment 9 at pp. 1-2. 7 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • (PC) Gonzalez v. Koranda

    District Court, E.D. California · Jan 9, 2023

    Dittman, 191 F.3d at 1025–26 (citing Atascadero State Hosp. 4 v. Scanlon, 473 U.S. 234, 241 (1985)); see also Brown v. Cal. … See Galbraith v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Wilson v. Pier 1 Imports (US), Inc.

    413 F. Supp. 2d 1130 · District Court, E.D. California · Feb 7, 2006

    See White v. … Brown Group, Inc., 517 U.S. 544, 551 , 116 S.Ct. 1529 , 134 L.Ed.2d 758 (1996).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • (HC) Frye v. Madden

    District Court, E.D. California · Nov 4, 2021

    See Valdez v. Montgomery, 918 F.3d 687, 693 (9th Cir. 2019); Boyd v. 24 Thompson, 147 F.3d 1124, 1127 (9th Cir. 1998). 25 Petitioner was convicted of attempted murder in 2000. … See Gandarela v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Shirley v. Yates

    950 F. Supp. 2d 1141 · District Court, E.D. California · Jun 5, 2013

    See, e.g., Israel v. … .”); United States v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • (HC) Williams v. Trate

    District Court, E.D. California · Jan 25, 2023

    No. 10 at 3-4). 20 Further, Petitioner’s reliance on United States v. Brown, 415 F. Supp. 3d 901 (N.D. Cal. 21 Nov. 8, 2019) is unavailing. … In Brown, the court found, because defendant Brown did not admit 22 to intending to distribute or possess with intent to distribute cocaine as part of his plea agreement, 23 defendant Brown’s § 924(c) conviction and sentence

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sullivan v. County of Tehama

    District Court, E.D. California · Feb 29, 2024

    Defendants, COUNTY OF TEHAMA, TEHAMA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, 7 DAVE HENCRATT, JESSE BROWN … 26 26(f) discovery plan; (ii) a stipulation to further stay this matter pending final resolution 27 28 1 Heck v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Zaiza v. Clark

    District Court, E.D. California · Dec 9, 2021

    Defendants only 9 permitted Plaintiff and race-based Modified Program inmates access to health care services 10 because of court orders from Plata v. Brown/Newsom, Coleman v. Brown/Newsom, and Perez 11 v. … Chavez, 678 F.3d 1042, 1044-45 (9th Cir. 2012) (exhaustion excused 16 where futile); Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PS) Newson v. Mercedes-Benz Financial Services

    District Court, E.D. California · Dec 12, 2024

    July 14, 2023) (“[C]ourts across the country have held that [Section 16] does not 17 provide plaintiffs with a private right of action and therefore does not establish federal question 18 jurisdiction”); Brown v. … Part 226, issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal 10 Reserve System, implements TILA. See 12 C.F.R. § 226.1(a).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Rodriguez v. Tsui

    District Court, E.D. California · Jan 21, 2022

    Booth v. … Jones v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Marti v. Rosario

    District Court, E.D. California · Jun 7, 2021

    Amendment failure to 25 protect claim against defendants Rosario and Brown; a First Amendment retaliation claim against 26 defendants Rosario, Brown, and Vanni; and supplemental state law tort claims against all 27 … Chambers v. 24 Nasco, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 43-46 (1991). In reviewing a motion to preserve evidence, the court 25 engages in a balancing test of several factors. Jardin v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bailey v. County of San Joaquin

    671 F. Supp. 2d 1167 · District Court, E.D. California · Nov 16, 2009

    Plaintiffs had to pay boarding fees for each day. Breitmaier did not receive any discipline or training as a result of this incident. II. STANDARD OF REVIEW FOR FED. R. CIV. … Brown v. Ransweiler, 171 Cal.App.4th 516, 526-27 , 89 Cal.Rptr.3d 801 (Cal.Ct.App.2009) (internal citations omitted).

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.