Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscaed

9,021 results

1.57s

  • Webb v. County of Trinity

    734 F. Supp. 2d 1018 · District Court, E.D. California · Aug 10, 2010

    The ALJ’s order was reviewed by the California State Personnel Board. On October 22, 2009, the Board adopted these findings in full, with one exception not relevant here. … Nor has plaintiff alleged that other process, such as a state proceeding to enforce the personnel board order, is unavailable.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • (PC) Kononov v. Sacramento County Sheriff Dept.

    District Court, E.D. California · Jul 31, 2023

    See Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th 24 Cir. 1982). … See 14 Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Lopez v. Merced County, Cal.

    473 F. Supp. 2d 1072 · District Court, E.D. California · Jan 26, 2007

    See United States v. … See also Wright v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ronald L. Seay v. California Department of Corrections/Rehabilitation, et al.

    District Court, E.D. California · Nov 17, 2025

    Dittman, 191 F.3d at 1025–26 (citing Atascadero State 5 Hosp. v. Scanlon, 473 U.S. 234, 241 (1985)); see also Brown v. Cal. … Brown v. Bueno, No. 1:17-cv-01295-LJO-SKO (PC), 2018 WL 6068513, at *3 (E.D. Cal. 2 | Nov. 20, 2018) (citing and quoting Wilson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Spencer Enterprises, Inc. v. United States

    229 F. Supp. 2d 1025 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 28, 2001

    The Ninth Circuit has held an abuse of discretion when the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) required an additional statutory requirement. See Ruangswang v. INS, 591 F.2d 39, 43 (9th Cir.1978). … The letter from the Fresno County Board of Supervisors must meet the requirements of 8 C.F.R. § 204.6 (i).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Lo v. County of Siskiyou

    District Court, E.D. California · May 12, 2022

    Brown v. Plata, 563 U.S. 493, 542 (2011) (citation omitted). … See, 10 e.g., Brown, 563 U.S. at 542; see also, e.g., Sys. Fed’n No. 91, Ry. Emp. Dep’t, AFL-CIO v. 11 Wright, 364 U.S. 642, 648 (1961); A&M Recs., Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Kory v. Bonta

    District Court, E.D. California · Apr 23, 2024

    Pickup v. 22 Brown, 740 F.3d 1208, 1229 (9th Cir. 2014), abrogated on other 23 grounds by NIFLA, 585 U.S. 755. … the relevant Board.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Baday v. County of Kings

    District Court, E.D. California · Oct 22, 2020

    TO FILE 12 v. … See Rhodes v. Robinson, 621 F.3d 1002, 1005 (9th Cir. 2010).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gastelum

    District Court, E.D. California · Aug 24, 2026

    See Wallace v. Kato, 549 U.S. 384, 4 387-88 (2007); Jones v. … See Bernson 4 v. Browning-Ferris Indus., 7 Cal. 4th 926, 931 (1994); see also McDaniel v. Lizarraga, 2021 LX 5 80232, at *15 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2021).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • McCue v. SOUTH FORK UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

    766 F. Supp. 2d 1003 · District Court, E.D. California · Feb 7, 2011

    Plaintiffs subsequently contacted the State Board of Education to report the February 28, 2008 incident. The State Board of Education reprimanded Defendants Shive, Damron, Zurin, Mixion, and the School District. … Woodrum v. Woodward County, 866 F. 2d 1121, 1125 (9th Cir.1989); Baker v. Racansky, 887 F.2d 183, 187 (9th Cir. 1989); Rogers v. Cnty. of San Joaquin, 487 F.3d 1288 , 1294 (9th Cir.2007).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • (PC) Bell v. Martel

    District Court, E.D. California · Sep 23, 2020

    See Orand v. United States, 602 2 | F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 3 | See Britt v. … Defendants Quinto, Brown, and Spalding are DISMISSED without prejudice from this 17 || action; and 18 5.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gay-Straight Alliance Network v. Visalia Unified School District

    262 F. Supp. 2d 1088 · District Court, E.D. California · Apr 9, 2001

    One Golden West office worker allegedly posts anti-gay comments on a bulletin board in the school office. See id. … Loomis attempted to attend a VUSD Board of Education meeting, he found that he had been replaced by another student. See id. Mr. Loomis was then told that ISP students could not serve on the Board. See id. Mr.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Sierra Club v. Watt

    608 F. Supp. 305 · District Court, E.D. California · Apr 24, 1985

    Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. at 577, 92 S.Ct. at 2709 . … See Mennonite Board of Missions v.

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • Nelson v. County of Sacramento

    926 F. Supp. 2d 1159 · District Court, E.D. California · Feb 26, 2013

    Brewster noted that county boards of supervisors have authority over the “law enforcement conduct.” 275 F.3d at 811 . … See Brown v. Cnty. of Kern, 2008 WL 544565 at *11-*12 (E.D.Cal.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Atkinson v. County of Tulare

    790 F. Supp. 2d 1188 · District Court, E.D. California · May 18, 2011

    In Porter v. … Section 302.2.2 of the Policy Manual further provides: A finding will be the consensus of the Board. After the Board has concluded, the board will submit written findings to the Sheriff.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • (PC) Alexander-Campos v. Bruce

    District Court, E.D. California · Jun 20, 2025

    Dittman, 191 F.3d at 1025–26 (citing Atascadero State Hosp. 23 v. Scanlon, 473 U.S. 234, 241 (1985)); see Brown v. Cal. … Farmer v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Vega v. Solano County Jail

    District Court, E.D. California · Jul 24, 2023

    See 13 Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). … See Bd. of County Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 27 397, 403 (1997). Thus, municipal liability must rest on the actions of the municipality, and not of 28 the actions of its employees or officers. See id.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Harned v. Landahl

    88 F. Supp. 2d 1118 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 17, 2000

    Board of Regents v. Tomanio, 446 U.S. 478 485-86 , 100 S.Ct. 1790 , 64 L.Ed.2d 440 (1980)(quoting Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc., 421 U.S. 454, 463-64 , 95 S.Ct. 1716 , 44 L.Ed.2d 295 , (1975)). … of Regents v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • L.H. v. Schwarzenegger

    519 F. Supp. 2d 1072 · District Court, E.D. California · Sep 19, 2007

    Nine years after Gagnon , the question of hearings under Morrissey was discussed in Pierre v. Washington State Board of Prison Terms and Paroles, 699 F.2d 471 (9th Cir.1983). … Id. at 311 ; see also White v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. City of Turlock

    483 F. Supp. 2d 1023 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 13, 2007

    The First Circuit began its review of the merits of the case by noting that “federal courts do not sit as a super zoning board or a zoning board of appeals.” Id. at 44 (citations omitted). … (Board of Supervisors v. Superior Court (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 1616, 1623 , 38 Cal.Rptr.2d 876 .)

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.