Case law

Board of Trustees of the Kern County Electrical Workers Pension Fund v. Measurement Instrumentation and Controls, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California · Oct 11, 2023

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 BOARD … P. 15(a), that such an 6 amendment is not (1) prejudicial to the opposing party, (2) the product of undue delay, (3) proposed in 7 bad faith, or (4) futile, see Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962). 8 V.

(PS) Olson v. Slote

District Court, E.D. California · Mar 27, 2025

local bulletin board in-person where 12 information was posted. … O’Brien v. 16 Welty, 818 F.3d 920, 932 (9th Cir. 2016) (quoting Pinard v. Clatskanie Sch.

Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Center v. United States Forest Service

52 F. Supp. 3d 1089 · District Court, E.D. California · Oct 1, 2014

(the “Water Board”). … Husman v. U.S., 616 F.Supp. 344, 346 (D.Wyo.1985) (citing Castle v. Womble, 19 L.D. 455, 457 (1894)).

Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.) Inc.

870 F. Supp. 2d 995 · District Court, E.D. California · Jun 27, 2012

Barriers Compliance Board,” 42 U.S.C. § 12186 (c), commonly referred to as the "Access Board.” … In sum, the Board establishes "minimum guidelines” for Title III, but the DOJ promulgates its own regulations, which must be consistent with-but not necessarily identical to-the Board's guidelines. Miller v.

Board of Trustees of the Roofers Local 27 Health and Welfare Trust Fund v. Absolute Urethane

District Court, E.D. California · Aug 19, 2019

Co., Inc. v. Boeing Co., Inc., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999) 5 | (quoting Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997)). … Pedrina v. Chun, 987 F.2d 608, 609 (9th 8 | Cir. 1993).

C.B. v. Sonora School District

691 F. Supp. 2d 1123 · District Court, E.D. California · Sep 22, 2009

See Brown v. County of Kern, 2008 WL 544565 at *12 n. 6 (E.D.Cal.2008). … See, e.g., S.M. v. West Contra Costa County Unified School Dist., 2007 WL 108456 , *4 (N.D.Cal.2007); Brown v. Napa Valley Unified School Dist., 2007 WL 2028201, *4 (N.D.Cal.2007); Fraser v.

Harrosh v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

District Court, E.D. California · Apr 16, 2025

See, e.g., Tahoe-Sierra, 27 535 U.S. at 313 & n.6; Brown v. Tahoe Reg’l Plan. Agency, 385 F. Supp. 1128, 1134 (D. Nev. 28 1973). … In Merry v.

Warden

District Court, E.D. California · Feb 12, 2026

See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B); see also 25 Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983). Jacqueline Brown is hereby appointed to 26 represent petitioner for the duration of the proceedings in this court. … See 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (establishing the All Writs Act which 4 || empowers the federal courts to “issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective 5 || jurisdictions....”); see also F.T.C. v.

Cummings v. Connell

177 F. Supp. 2d 1060 · District Court, E.D. California · May 2, 2001

See Abood v. … Requiring a union to apportion time spent during board meetings would remove the flexibility necessary for the union’s performance of its function as an exclusive collective bargaining representative. See Fell v.

Selvester v. State of CA, al

District Court, E.D. California · Mar 27, 2025

No. 51 at 2) (citing Garrett v. Hine, No. 1:21- 22 cv-00845-DAD-BAK, 2022 WL 2067903 (E.D. Cal. June 8, 2022)). … Plaintiff’s SAC still brings the defamation claim against 24 defendant Brown.

Spence v. Mendoza

993 F. Supp. 785 · District Court, E.D. California · Feb 11, 1998

Terrell v. … See McCarthy v. Madigan, 503 U.S. 140 , 112 S.Ct. 1081 , 117 L.Ed.2d 291 (1992).

Nevada Irrigation District v. Oppenheimer

District Court, E.D. California · Dec 6, 2023

Williams v. … Brown, 992 F.2d 937, 942 (9th Cir. 1993) (holding that 1 school districts are more like corporate persons than state entities in finding that they 2 have standing to pursue constitutional claims).

San Joaquin Valley Insurance Authority v. Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California · Feb 6, 2020

See Columbia Pictures Television, Inc. v. … Brown Act [] 3 requires that, with exceptions that do not apply here, all of a public entity’s business be conducted 4 in open session.” (ECF No. 94, at p. 13, citing Cal. Govt. Code §§ 54950, et seq.).

Dairy v. Dairy Employees Union Local No. 17 Christian Labor Ass'n of the United States of America Pension Trust

153 F. Supp. 3d 1217 · District Court, E.D. California · Dec 23, 2015

See Board of Trustees of the Constr. Laborers’ Pension Trust v. M.M. Sundt Constr. Co., 37 F.3d 1419 , 1420 (9th Cir.1994). … Board of Trustees, 542 F.2d 1128 , 1131 (9th Cir.1976); Turner v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, etc., 604 F.2d 1219 , 1227 (9th Cir.1979).

(PC)Vera v. Warden

District Court, E.D. California · Jun 10, 2024

See, e.g., Brown v. Shaffer, No. 1:18-cv-00470-AWI-HBK 16 (PC), 2021 WL 4441693, at *7 (E.D. Cal. … Sept. 28, 2021) (recommending dismissal of due 17 process claim following BPH proceeding and stating “claims that the Board relied on false 18 information is … cognizable only in habeas”); Molina v. Brown, No.

Northwestern Fruit Co. v. A. Levy & J. Zentner Co.

116 F.R.D. 384 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 24, 1986

E.g., In re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation, 80 F.R.D. 244, 252 (S.D.Tex.1978); In re Glassine and Greaseproof Payer Antitrust Litigation, 88 F.R.D. 302, 307 (E.D.Pa.1980); Brown v. … Cameron-Brown Comyany, 92 F.R.D. 32, 49 (E.D.Va.1981).

Sierra Club v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

916 F. Supp. 2d 1098 · District Court, E.D. California · Jan 4, 2013

V(g).) … Sims v.

El Comite Para el Bienestar de Earlimart v. Helliker

416 F. Supp. 2d 912 · District Court, E.D. California · Feb 22, 2006

See Bayview Hunters Point Community Advocates v. Metropolitan Transportation Commission, 366 F.3d 692, 695 (9th Cir.2004) (citing Friends of the Earth v. … Public Citizen v. Dept. of Transp., 316 F.3d 1002 , 1021 (9th Cir.2003).

Anders

District Court, E.D. California · Nov 19, 2025

California State University, Fresno and Board 15 of Trustees of California State University, 16 Defendants. 17 18 This matter came before the court on the parties’ joint motion for … See Kang v. Credit Bureau Connection, Inc., No. 18-01359, 2023 WL 21 3751117, at *5 (E.D. Cal. June 1, 2023).

(PC) Davis III v. Gibson

District Court, E.D. California · Nov 1, 2019

Jones v. … Jan. 28, 2013) (stating the California Victim Compensation and Government 24 Claims Board was immune from suit as an agency of the State of California); Brown v.