Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscadc

10,000+ results

0.71s

  • Warehousemen's Union, Local 117 v. National Labor Relations Board

    121 F.2d 84 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 5, 1941

    B. v. Falk Corp., 1940, 308 U.S. 453, 461 , 60 S.Ct. 307 , 84 L.Ed. 396 ; N. L. R. B. v. Highland Park Mfg. Co., 4 Cir., 1940, 110 F.2d 632, 640 ; Texas & N. O. R. R. v. Brotherhood of Ry. … F. of L. v. N. L. R. B., 1940, 308 U.S. 401, 405, 409 , 60 S.Ct. 300 , 84 L.Ed. 347 . In Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. N. L. R.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Carpenters District Council v. National Labor Relations Board

    274 F.2d 564 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 9, 1959

    Local 1976, United Brotherhood of Carpenters, etc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 1958, 357 U.S. 93, 98 , 78 S.Ct. 1011, 1015 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1186 (emphasis supplied). … L. v. National Labor Relations Board, 1954, 347 U.S. 17, 45 , 74 S.Ct. 323 , 98 L.Ed. 455 ).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Frontier Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    259 F.2d 808 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 20, 1958

    Civil Aeronautics Board, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 184 , 243 F.2d 607 (1957); United Air Lines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 42 , 228 F.2d 13 (1955) 3 United Air Lines v. … Civil Aeronautics Board, supra note 1 4 North American Airlines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 55 , 237 F.2d 209 (D.C.Cir.1956)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Local No. 152 v. National Labor Relations Board

    343 F.2d 307 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 28, 1965

    We accordingly will set aside that part of the order of the Board which dismissed the complaint as to Baker and remand this phase of the ease to the Board for its further consideration. See NLRB v. … See also Scobell Chemical Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Switchmen's Union of N. America v. National M. Board

    135 F.2d 785 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 24, 1943

    Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. National Mediation Board, cited supra, note 19; Order of Railway Conductors of America v. … Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. National Mediation Board, cited supra, note 23; Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Switchmen's Union v. National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297 (1943)Cited 17 timesPublished
  • International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-Cio v. National Mediation Board

    870 F.2d 733 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 24, 1989

    Whatever deference is owed to the Board under Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. … Camp v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Di Giorgio Fruit Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

    191 F.2d 642 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 5, 1951

    National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Construction Trades Council, 1951, 341 U.S. 675 , 71 S.Ct. 943 , 95 L.Ed. 1284 . . National Labor Relations Board v. … F. of L. v. National Labor Relations Board, 1951, 341 U.S. 694 , 71 S.Ct. 954 , 95 L.Ed. 1299 .

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Textile Workers Union v. National Labor Relations Board

    315 F.2d 41 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 31, 1963

    Textile Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO v. … , entered into after Board complaint had issued, between the General Counsel of the Board and the employers charged with unfair labor practices.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Aikens v. United States Postal Service Board of Governors

    665 F.2d 1057 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 8, 1981

    See Teamsters v. United States, 431 U.S. 324 , 358 & n.44, 97 S.Ct. 1843 , 1866 n.44, 52 L.Ed.2d 396 (1977). As the Court explained in Furnco Construction Co. v. … Aikens v. United States Postal Serv., 642 F.2d 514 (D.C.Cir.1980), rev'd, 453 U.S. 902 , 101 S.Ct. 3135 , 69 L.Ed.2d 989 (1981). . Aikens v.

    Reversed on other grounds by United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens, 460 U.S. 711 (1983)Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Joy Silk Mills, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    185 F.2d 732 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 2, 1950

    B. v. … B. v. Express Publishing Co., 312 U.S. 426, 437 , 61 S.Ct. 693, 700 , 85 L.Ed. 930 . Neither the Board nor the courts- can read the minds of men. As the Board has stated: .

    Cited 202 timesPublished
  • International Longshore & Warehouse Union v. National Labor Relations Board

    705 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 6, 2017

    Our review of unfair labor practice determinations by the Board is “quite narrow.” Traction Wholesale Ctr. Co. v. NLRB, 216 F.3d 92, 99 (D.C. Cir. 2000). … Under this standard, the Board’s findings are “conclusive” if supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e); Universal Camera Corp. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • District Lodge 64, International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

    949 F.2d 441 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 29, 1991

    NLRB v. … actions”); NLRB v.

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • Brown, P Hamilton v. Ridge, Thomas J.

    327 F.3d 1198 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 2, 2003

    Brown v. Summers, 201 F. Supp. 2d 60, 63–64 (D.D.C. 2002). … Brown, 201 F. Supp at 62–63.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Interstate Quality Services, Inc. v. Railroad Retirement Board

    83 F.3d 1463 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 17, 1996

    But see Itel Corp. v. … v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Co. Accounting Oversight Board

    537 F.3d 667 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 22, 2008

    context,” Spies v. … Wonsover v. SEC, 205 F.3d 408, 413-14 (D.C.Cir.2000). V.

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • Mathews Readymix, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    165 F.3d 74 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 29, 1999

    Although the Board’s findings of fact are conclusive if supported by substantial evidence, see Avecor, Inc. v. … Sullivan Indus. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Laborers' International Union of North America, Local 859, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

    446 F.2d 1319 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 7, 1971

    A picket equipped with a sign 2 stationed himself in a motor vehicle across the street from the Brown job site. Brown filed charges with the Board. … We agree with the Board’s conclusion that Byrne, Citadel and Brown were neutral secondary employers. We hold that the Independents were “struck-work allies” of McDonald.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Corson and Gruman Company v. National Labor Relations Board

    899 F.2d 47 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 27, 1990

    Even if the Board did err in not applying Deklewa, moreover, the Company should have addressed that mistake initially before the Board, not this court. See United States v. … Although it did note this point before the Board, the Company never raised this issue in its opening brief before us and therefore waived the argument in this court. See Reyes-Arias v.

    Cited 66 timesPublished
  • International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-Cio v. National Mediation Board

    785 F.2d 1098 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 21, 1986

    The early cases carried on this line in fact involved not the NMB but the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). In Leedom v. … Board jurisdiction.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Veritas Health Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    671 F.3d 1267 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 13, 2012

    Wayneview Care Center v. NLRB, 664 F.3d 341, 348 (D.C. Cir. 2011) (citation omitted). … See Perdue Farms, Inc. v. NLRB, 144 F.3d 830, 834 (D.C.

    Cited 13 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.