Case law

Daycon Products Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

494 F. App'x 97 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 6, 2012

It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the petition for review be denied and the Board’s cross-application for enforcement be granted. … We hold that the Board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence in the record. Daycon also raises procedural challenges to the Board’s denial of certain motions.

Walter C. Barnes v. George J. Reed, Chairman, United States Board of Parole, Members, United States Board of Parole

301 F.2d 516 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 11, 1962

The District Court granted the Parole Board’s motion to dismiss on the ground that, since the Board had offered Barnes a rehearing with counsel present, the controversy became moot. Reed v. … Upon the authority of that case the judgment of the District Court in the present ease is reversed, and the case is remanded for the entry of an order in accordance with the opinion in Reed v. Butterworth.

Local 702, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

215 F.3d 11 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 9, 2000

American Ship Building Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, supra; National Labor Relations Board v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278 , 85 S.Ct. 980 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965); and National Labor Relations Board v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Brown, supra, 380 U.S. at 289 , 85 S.Ct. at 987 ; American Ship Building Co. v.

Garvey Marine, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

245 F.3d 819 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 17, 2001

Co. v. NLRB, 140 F.3d 259, 265 (D.C.Cir.1998). The Board’s determination finds such support. … Plastics, Inc. v. NLRB, 209 F.3d 727, 738 (D.C.Cir.2000), we scrutinize with great care the Board’s decision to issue one. The Board must show that the employer’s ULPs were “serious,” Skyline Distrib. v.

Nancy Johnson v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

969 F.2d 1082 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 11, 1992

Compare Linquist v. … See, e.g., Crandon v.

Texas International Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

458 F.2d 782 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 28, 1971

We agree with the Government and with Ozark Air Lines, Inc. v. … Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. CAB, 128 U.S.App.D.C. 126, 148 , 385 F.2d 648, 670 (1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 944 , 88 S.Ct. 1029 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1133 (1968); Virgo Corp. v.

ITT Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

413 F.3d 64 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 28, 2005

This court reviewed the Board’s decision in ITT Industries, Inc. v. NLRB, 251 F.3d 995, 1006-07 (D.C. Cir. 2001). … NLRB v.

International Longshoremen's Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board

277 F.2d 681 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 28, 1960

The cross petition for enforcement is denied, and the case in all other respects is remanded to the Board for further consideration in the light of the master contract and of this opinion. So ordered. . See Doucis v. … Labor Board v. Wooster Division of Borg-Warner Corp., 356 U.S. 342, 349 , 78 S.Ct. 718, 722 , 2 L.Ed.2d 823 (1958). . Id., 356 U.S. 342 , 78 S.Ct. 718 (1958).

Sutter East Bay Hospitals v. National Labor Relations Board

687 F.3d 424 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 24, 2012

Milakshmi V. Rajapakse, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief was John H. … In NLRB v.

Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

228 F.2d 17 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 24, 1955

Ashbacker Radio Corp. v. Federal Communications Comm., 320 U.S. 327 , 66 S.Ct. 148, 90 L.Ed. 108 (1945). . Northwest Airlines v. … Civil Aeronautics Board, 90 U.SApp.D.C. 158, 194 F.2d 339 (D.C.Cir.1952); Western Air Lines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 184 F.2d 545 (9th Cir.1950). . Supra note 5, 326 U.S. at page 332 , 66 S.Ct. at page 150 . .

Veritas Health Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

671 F.3d 1267 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 13, 2012

Wayneview Care Center v. NLRB, 664 F.3d 341, 348 (D.C. Cir. 2011) (citation omitted). … See Perdue Farms, Inc. v. NLRB, 144 F.3d 830, 834 (D.C.

Unbelievable, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

118 F.3d 795 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 18, 1997

Rich Co. v. … In Smith v.

Textile Workers Union v. National Labor Relations Board

294 F.2d 738 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 27, 1961

In Marine Engineers’ Beneficial Ass’n v. N. L. R. … International Union of Electrical Workers v. N. L. R. B., 110 U.S.App.D.C. 91 , 289 F.2d 757 .

Roosevelt Brandon v. District of Columbia Board of Parole

734 F.2d 56 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 8, 1984

Compare Booth v. Hammock, 605 F.2d 661 (2d Cir.1979) (Greenholtz makes shall/unless formulation decisive) and Slocum v. Georgia State Board of Pardons & Paroles, 678 F.2d 940 (11th Cir.1982) (same) with Winsett v. … Anderson v.

International Longshore & Warehouse Union v. National Labor Relations Board

705 F. App'x 3 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 6, 2017

Our review of unfair labor practice determinations by the Board is “quite narrow.” Traction Wholesale Ctr. Co. v. NLRB, 216 F.3d 92, 99 (D.C. Cir. 2000). … Under this standard, the Board’s findings are “conclusive” if supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e); Universal Camera Corp. v.

Allied Mechanical Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

668 F.3d 758 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 17, 2012

Ass’n v. … See Kravis, 550 F.3d at 1189 (deferring to the Board’s finding of section 9(a) status where the Board “reasonably” reached its conclusion); see also NLRB v.

Capitol International Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

392 F.2d 511 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 8, 1968

Federal Trade Comm’n v. [Standard] Education Society, 302 U.S. 112, 117 [ 58 S.Ct. 113, 115 , 82 L.Ed 141]; Gray v. Powell, 314 U.S. 402, 412 [ 62 S.Ct. 326, 332 , 86 L.Ed. 301 ]; Labor Board v. … Outagamie County, Wisconsin v. C.A.B., 355 F.2d 900 (7th Cir. 1966).

Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

443 F.2d 745 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 12, 1971

The Board refused, and Delta, among others, petitioned this court to review the decision. In National Air Lines, Inc. v. … See City of Lawrence, Massachusetts v. CAB, 343 F.2d 583 (1st Cir. 1965); Northeast Airlines, Inc. v. CAB, 331 F.2d 579 (1st Cir. (1984)).

Sundor Brands, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

168 F.3d 515 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 26, 1999

In American Hospital Association v. … See NLRB v. Metropolitan Life Ins.

Blue Man Vegas, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

529 F.3d 417 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 10, 2008

Before: GINSBURG, BROWN, and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GINSBURG. … The Board’s principal concern in evaluating a proposed bargaining unit is whether the employees share a “community of interest.” NLRB v. Action Auto., Inc., 469 U.S. 490, 494 (1985); see also Agri Processor Co., Inc. v.