Case law

National Aviation Trades Association v. Civil Aeronautics Board

420 F.2d 209 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 2, 1969

Many of the key questions in this action are matters of market definition, and, as the Supreme Court indicated in Brown Shoe Co. v United States, 370 U.S. 294 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962), the process of defining … Therefore, the Board's order must be 53 Affirmed. 1 In Bergen County v.

Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

243 F.2d 607 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 6, 1956

The Board denied these motions. Eastern petitions for review. We think that under our decision in United Air Lines v. … Ashbacker Radio Co. v. Federal Communications Comm., 326 U.S. 327 , 66 S. Ct. 148 , 90 L.Ed. 108 (1945). . See. 403(c), Civil Aeronautics Act, 52 Stat 987 (1938), 49 U.S.C.A. § 481 (c). . Delta Air Lines v.

United Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

278 F.2d 446 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 7, 1960

v. … Large Irregular Carriers, Exemptions, 11 C.A.B. 609 (1950); American Airlines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 348 , 235 F.2d 845 (D.C.Cir.1956). . 72 Stat. 754 , 49 U.S.C.A. § 1371 . .

National Labor Relations Board v. Harris Teeter Supermarkets

215 F.3d 32 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 13, 2000

See NLRB v. Harris- Teeter Supermarket, 905 F.2d 1530 (4th Cir. 1990) (table). … As the Supreme Court explained in Board of Education v. Dowell, 498 U.S. 237 (1991), a case involving the modification of a desegregation decree, "compliance with pre- vious court orders is obviously relevant."

Rhino Northwest, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

867 F.3d 95 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 11, 2017

NLRB, 842 F.3d 784, 792-93 (2d Cir. 2016); FedEx Freight, Inc. v. NLRB, 839 F.3d 636, 638 (7th Cir. 2016); NLRB v. FedEx Freight, Inc., 832 F.3d 432, 441-43 (3d Cir. 2016); Macy’s, Inc. v. … NLRB, 824 F.3d 557, 567 (5th Cir. 2016); Nestle Dreyer’s Ice Cream Co. v. NLRB, 821 F.3d 489, 500 (4th Cir. 2016); FedEx Freight, Inc. v. NLRB, 816 F.3d 515, 523-24 (8th Cir. 2016); Kindred Nursing Ctrs. East, LLC v.

Hotel Bel-Air v. National Labor Relations Board

637 F. App'x 4 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 8, 2016

This case was considered on the record from the National Labor Relations Board and on the briefs of the parties. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. CIR. R. 34(j). … Therefore, on the record before us, we grant enforcement of the Board’s cross-application for enforcement of its Order, in full.

Bordas & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

288 F.2d 132 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 19, 1961

into on or about September 8, 1958, the decision of this court is reserved pending disposition by the Supreme Court of the United States of the cases of Local 357, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, etc. v. … B. v. Local 60, United Brotherhood of Carpenters, 7 Cir., 1960, 273 F.2d 699 , certiorari granted 363 U.S. 837 , 80 S.Ct. 1610 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1723 , or until the further order of this court.

Ampersand Publishing, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

702 F.3d 51 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 18, 2012

Fashion Valley Mall v. NLRB, 451 F.3d 241, 243 (D.C. Cir. 2006). We owe no deference to the Board’s resolution of constitutional questions. See, e.g., Lead Indus. Ass’n v. EPA, 647 F.2d 1130, 1173-74 (D.C. … Eastex, Inc. v. NLRB, 437 U.S. 556, 565 (1978). The courts’ construction of § 7 leaves the Board broad authority, see, e.g., Stephens Media, LLC v. NLRB, 677 F.3d 1241, 1251 (D.C. Cir. 2012), but there are limits.

Human Development Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board

937 F.2d 657 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 9, 1991

NLRB v. Kemmerer Village, Inc., 907 F.2d 661, 663-64 (7th Cir.1990) (citations omitted). Cf. Hicks v. … Corp. v.

United Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

228 F.2d 13 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 1955

Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc., v. Waterman S. S. Corp., 1948, 333 U.S. 103, 112-113 , 68 S.Ct. 431, 437 , 92 L.Ed. 568 . Cf. Is-brandtsen Co. v. … In Federal Communications Comm. v.

Gertrude M. Gordon v. Railroad Retirement Board

696 F.2d 131 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 12, 1983

Johnson v. Young, 372 A.2d 992, 994 (D.C.App.1977). … Mayo v. Ford, 184 A.2d 38, 41 (D.C.App.1962). Although the Board stated that it recognized and applied the aforediscussed presumption, it found that the presumption had been overcome.

Halle Enterprises, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

247 F.3d 268 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 27, 2001

See Darr v. NLRB, 801 F.2d 1404, 1407 (D.C. … Time Warner Cable v. NLRB, 160 F.3d 1, 3 (D.C. Cir. 1998). We conclude that there is substantial evidence to support the Board's finding.

National Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

306 F.2d 753 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 24, 1962

Federal Communications Comm’n [ 71 App.D.C. 11 , 107 F.2d 212 (1939)], Federal Communications Comm’n v. Sanders Radio Station [ 309 U.S. 470 , 60 S.Ct. 693 , 84 L.Ed. 869 (1940)], Alton R. [Co.] v. … The Board has safeguarded the rights of petitioners in the proceeding under Docket 11620, as evidenced by ft 2 of Order No. E-17811, supra. See American Trucking Assn’s v.

Advanced Micro Devices v. Civil Aeronautics Board

742 F.2d 1520 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 7, 1984

II A carrier introduces a new rate by filing a tariff with the Board. See 49 U.S.C. § 1373 (1976 & Supp. V 1981); id. § 14820(1) (Supp. V 1981). … FPC v.

Lummus Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

339 F.2d 728 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 11, 1964

in Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. … N.L.R.B. v. Local 490, International Hod Carriers, 300 F.2d 328 (8th Cir. 1962); N.L.R.B. v.

Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

495 F.2d 145 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 20, 1974

United Air Lines v. CAB, 198 F.2d 100, 106 (7th Cir. 1952). See also Western Air Lines v. CAB, 196 F.2d 933 (9th Cir. 1952); Alaska Airlines v. CAB, 109 U.S.App.D.C. 230 , 285 F.2d 672 (1960). B. … See also Alaska Airlines v. CAB, supra.

KLB Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

700 F.3d 551 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 4, 2012

But prompted by a series of Seventh Circuit decisions, the Board changed course. See, e.g., NLRB v. Harvstone Manufacturing Corp., 785 F.2d 570 (7th Cir.1986). … Graphic Communications International Union v. NLRB, 977 F.2d 1168 , 1169 (7th Cir.1992). We addressed the Board’s Nielsen standard in ConAgra, Inc. v. NLRB, 117 F.3d 1435 (D.C.Cir.1997).

Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

497 F.2d 608 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 23, 1973

In National Airlines v. CAB, 129 U.S. … In Braniff Airways v.

Ervin Szewczuga and Gerald Treichel v. National Labor Relations Board, Miller Brewing Company v. National Labor Relations Board

686 F.2d 962 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 17, 1982

Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. NLRB, 319 U.S. 533, 540 , 63 S.Ct. 1214, 1218 , 87 L.Ed. 1568 (1943). We find no reason to disturb the Board’s order. V. … NLRB v.

Southern Power Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

664 F.3d 946 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 6, 2012

The Board assesses all of these factors “from the perspective of the employees involved.” Cmty. Hosps. of Cent. Cal. v. NLRB, 335 F.3d 1079, 1083 (D.C. Cir. 2003). … We, however, owe great deference to the Board’s selection of bargaining units, and the Board “need only select an appropriate unit, not the most appropriate unit.” Dean Transp., Inc. v. NLRB, 551 F.3d 1055, 1063 (D.C.