Case law

Frazier Industrial Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

213 F.3d 750 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 9, 2000

See Synergy Gas Corp. v. NLRB, 19 F.3d 649, 651 (D.C.Cir.1994). The court gives even greater deference to the Board’s determination of questions of motive, see Laro Maintenance Corp. v. … The Board has broad remedial discretion to devise remedies that effectuate the policies of the Act, see ABF Freight System, Inc. v.

United Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

228 F.2d 13 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 1955

Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc., v. Waterman S. S. Corp., 1948, 333 U.S. 103, 112-113 , 68 S.Ct. 431, 437 , 92 L.Ed. 568 . Cf. Is-brandtsen Co. v. … In Federal Communications Comm. v.

Pacific Micronesia Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

219 F.3d 661 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 27, 2000

including the body of evidence opposed to the Board's view." Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 488 (1951). … NLRB v.

Deming Hospital Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

665 F.3d 196 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 20, 2011

Milakshmi V. Rajapakse, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were John H. … Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. BROWN, Circuit Judge: Deming Hospital Corporation operates Mimbres Memorial Hospital (the “Hospital”) in New Mexico.

Unbelievable, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

118 F.3d 795 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 18, 1997

Workers v. NLRB, we reaffirmed the Board's authority to award attorney's fees in similar circumstances. International Union of Elec., Radio and Mach. Workers v. … NLRB v.

Daikichi Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

56 F. App'x 516 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 3, 2003

Warshawsky & Co. v. NLRB, 182 F.3d 948, 955 (D.C.Cir. 1999); Int’l Union, UAW v. NLRB, 459 F.2d 1329, 1344-45 (D.C.Cir.1972). … Co. v. NLRB, 99 F.3d 413, 423-424 (D.C.Cir. 1996); MECO Corp. v. NLRB, 986 F.2d 1434, 1437-38 (D.C.Cir.1993).

Bally's Park Place, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

646 F.3d 929 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 5, 2011

Indeed, “the Board is to be reversed only when the record is ‘so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find’ to the contrary.” Id. (quoting INS v. … Workers v. NLRB, 215 F.3d 11, 15 (D.C. Cir. 2000) (internal quotation marks omitted); see Universal Camera Corp. v.

Davis Supermarkets, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

2 F.3d 1162 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 27, 1993

NLRB v. … Accordingly, we see no reason to overturn the Board’s decision. Because all the prerequisites for a Gissel bargaining order are satisfied, we uphold the Board’s issuance of such an order. V.

Alois Box Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

216 F.3d 69 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 27, 2000

Corp. v. … The Board properly applied its “rule against relitigation,” Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v.

Prime Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

266 F.3d 1233 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 12, 2001

Ctr. v. NLRB, 871 F.2d 137, 145 (D.C. Cir. 1989). … We have held that before the Board issues a bargaining order on the basis of a union majority of authorization cards--a Gissel order, after NLRB v.

Matson Terminals, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

637 F. App'x 609 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 26, 2016

The Board did not abuse its discretion in' enforcing that well-settled procedural rule here. See Pace Univ. v. … Servs., Inc. v. NLRB, 668 F.3d 758, 771 (D.C.Cir.2012). Accordingly, we deny Matson’s petition for review and grant the Board’s cross-application for enforcement of its order. Pursuant to D.C.

Fortuna Enterprises, LP v. National Labor Relations Board

789 F.3d 154 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 12, 2015

. v. … Fortuna points to Cone Mills Corp. v.

Union Pacific Railroad v. Surface Transportation Board

62 F. App'x 354 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 30, 2003

This cause came to be heard on the record compiled before the Surface Transportation Board and was briefed and argued by counsel. … It is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petitions be denied for the reasons stated in the Board’s decisions.

Southern Power Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

664 F.3d 946 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 6, 2012

The Board assesses all of these factors “from the perspective of the employees involved.” Cmty. Hosps. of Cent. Cal. v. NLRB, 335 F.3d 1079, 1083 (D.C. Cir. 2003). … We, however, owe great deference to the Board’s selection of bargaining units, and the Board “need only select an appropriate unit, not the most appropriate unit.” Dean Transp., Inc. v. NLRB, 551 F.3d 1055, 1063 (D.C.

National Labor Relations Board v. Arcade-Sunshine Co.

132 F.2d 8 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 19, 1942

The master’s report will be confirmed, the order to show cause discharged, and the Board’s petition denied. National Labor Relations Board v. Arcade-Sunshine Co., Inc., 73 App.D.C. 128 , 118 F.2d 49 . … National Labor Relations Board v. Arcade-Sunshine Co., Inc., 74 App.D.C. 361 , 122 F.2d 964 .

Vermont Public Service Board v. Federal Communications Commission

661 F.3d 54 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 18, 2011

In 2003, following litigation in the Tenth Circuit not directly relevant here, Qwest Corp. v. … Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, 18 FCC Rcd. 22559, 22583 ¶ 39.

Flamingo Hilton-Laughlin v. National Labor Relations Board

148 F.3d 1166 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 31, 1998

In NLRB v. … Co. v.

Hotel Bel-Air v. National Labor Relations Board

637 F. App'x 4 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 8, 2016

This case was considered on the record from the National Labor Relations Board and on the briefs of the parties. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. CIR. R. 34(j). … Therefore, on the record before us, we grant enforcement of the Board’s cross-application for enforcement of its Order, in full.

Service Corp. International v. National Labor Relations Board

495 F.3d 681 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 27, 2007

, Salaried, Mach. & Furniture Workers v. … When making decisions about representation elections, the Board is entitled to “a wide degree of discretion,” NLRB v. A.J.

H. B. Roberts v. National Labor Relations Board

350 F.2d 427 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 21, 1965

ROBERTS, Business Manager of Local 925, International Union of Operating Engineers, and Local 925, International Union of Operating Engineers, Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. No. 18942. … Also see, the National Labor Relations Board, Rules and Regulations Series 8, as amended, Section 102.9. 14 7. Hercules Powder Co. v. N. L. R.