Case law

Frontier Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

439 F.2d 634 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 27, 1971

In Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. CAB, 107 U.S.App.D.C. 174, 187 , 275 F.2d 632 , 645 (1959), cert. denied, Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. … But, once the Board has fixed upon a central consideration which it regards as conclusive, it need not deal in detail with every other aspect of the matter. Outagamie County v.

Reno Hilton Resorts v. National Labor Relations Board

196 F.3d 1275 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 3, 1999

Cir. 1997), or unless the Board "acted arbitrari- ly or otherwise erred in applying established law to the facts." Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. NLRB, 104 F.3d 1354, 1358 (D.C. … Corp. v. NLRB, 56 F.3d 224, 229 (D.C. Cir. 1995), and "accept[s] the ALJ's credibility determinations that are adopted by the Board 'unless they are patently unsupport- able.' " Schaeff Inc. v.

Time Warner Cable v. National Labor Relations Board

160 F.3d 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 6, 1998

(Time Warner) petitions for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board) concluding that it engaged in an unfair labor practice by refusing to bargain with the Communication Workers of America, … Peoples Gas Sys., Inc. v. NLRB, 629 F.2d 35 , 42 (D.C.Cir.1980). We do not, however," ‘merely rubber stamp NLRB decisions,”’ Davis Mem’l Goodwill Indus. v. NLRB, 108 F.3d 406, 410 (D.C.Cir.1997) (quoting Avecor, Inc. v.

Herbert Harvey, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

385 F.2d 684 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 26, 1967

The Labor Board also rejected Harvey’s other contentions and ordered an election, which was held and led to the Board’s certification of the union as bargaining representative. … The Bank’s status as an employer was pointedly raised before the Board, but the Board’s decision neither determines nor discusses the question.

Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v. National Mediation Board, National Mediation Board v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers

410 F.2d 1025 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 29, 1969

Switchmen’s Union of North America v. National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 (1943). . Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, etc. v. … C. v. National Securities, Inc., 393 U.S. 453, 467-468 , 89 S.Ct. 564 , 21 L.Ed.2d 668 (1969). . See Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, etc. v.

Railway Labor Executives' Association v. National Mediation Board

988 F.2d 133 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 23, 1993

The Board derives this position from the seminal Leedom v. … NLRB v.

Exxon Chemical Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

386 F.3d 1160 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 26, 2004

While the Board’s interpretation of the scope of the parties’ contractual agreement is subject to de novo review, Litton Fin. Printing Div. v. … NLRB v. Strong Roofing & Insulating Co., 393 U.S. 357, 361 (1969). The Board quite reasonably found it significant that the parties were in an end-game situation.

Healthbridge Management, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

672 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 30, 2016

See Hilyer v. Howat Concrete Co., 578 F.2d 422 , 426 n.7 (D.C. Cir. 1978). … See CTS Corp. v. EPA, 759 F.3d 52, 64 (D.C. Cir. 2014) (“[HJiding an argument [in a footnote] and then articulating it in only a conclusory fashion results in forfeiture.”).

Fugazy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

350 F.2d 733 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 5, 1965

Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, March 18, 1965, 120 U.S.App.D.C. -, 345 F.2d 445 . … Standard Airlines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 85 U.S.App.D.C. 29 , 177 F.2d 18 (1949).

National Aviation Trades Ass'n v. Civil Aeronautics Board

420 F.2d 209 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 2, 1969

Many of the key questions in this action are matters of market definition, and, as the Supreme Court indicated in Brown Shoe Co. v. … Therefore, the Board’s order must be Affirmed. . In Bergen County v.

Richard Pickus v. United States Board of Parole

543 F.2d 240 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 9, 1976

Pickus v. United States Board of Parole, 165 U.S.App.D.C. 284 , 507 F.2d 1107 (1974), relying on 5 U.S.C. § 553 (1970). 2 . … See Childs v. U. S. Board of Parole, 167 U.S.App.D.C. 268 , 511 F.2d 1270 (1974). See also Bradford v. Weinstein, 519 F.2d 728 (4th Cir. 1974), vacated as moot 423 U.S. 147 , 96 S.Ct. 347 , 46 L.Ed.2d 350 (1975) .

Davis Supermarkets, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

2 F.3d 1162 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 27, 1993

NLRB v. … Accordingly, we see no reason to overturn the Board’s decision. Because all the prerequisites for a Gissel bargaining order are satisfied, we uphold the Board’s issuance of such an order. V.

Frazier Industrial Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

213 F.3d 750 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 9, 2000

See Synergy Gas Corp. v. NLRB, 19 F.3d 649, 651 (D.C.Cir.1994). The court gives even greater deference to the Board’s determination of questions of motive, see Laro Maintenance Corp. v. … The Board has broad remedial discretion to devise remedies that effectuate the policies of the Act, see ABF Freight System, Inc. v.

Pacific Micronesia Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

219 F.3d 661 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 27, 2000

including the body of evidence opposed to the Board's view." Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 488 (1951). … NLRB v.

Deming Hospital Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

665 F.3d 196 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 20, 2011

Milakshmi V. Rajapakse, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were John H. … Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. BROWN, Circuit Judge: Deming Hospital Corporation operates Mimbres Memorial Hospital (the “Hospital”) in New Mexico.

Unbelievable, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

118 F.3d 795 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 18, 1997

Workers v. NLRB, we reaffirmed the Board's authority to award attorney's fees in similar circumstances. International Union of Elec., Radio and Mach. Workers v. … NLRB v.

Daikichi Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

56 F. App'x 516 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 3, 2003

Warshawsky & Co. v. NLRB, 182 F.3d 948, 955 (D.C.Cir. 1999); Int’l Union, UAW v. NLRB, 459 F.2d 1329, 1344-45 (D.C.Cir.1972). … Co. v. NLRB, 99 F.3d 413, 423-424 (D.C.Cir. 1996); MECO Corp. v. NLRB, 986 F.2d 1434, 1437-38 (D.C.Cir.1993).

Bally's Park Place, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

646 F.3d 929 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 5, 2011

Indeed, “the Board is to be reversed only when the record is ‘so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find’ to the contrary.” Id. (quoting INS v. … Workers v. NLRB, 215 F.3d 11, 15 (D.C. Cir. 2000) (internal quotation marks omitted); see Universal Camera Corp. v.

Alois Box Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

216 F.3d 69 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 27, 2000

Corp. v. … The Board properly applied its “rule against relitigation,” Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v.

Prime Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

266 F.3d 1233 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 12, 2001

Ctr. v. NLRB, 871 F.2d 137, 145 (D.C. Cir. 1989). … We have held that before the Board issues a bargaining order on the basis of a union majority of authorization cards--a Gissel order, after NLRB v.