Case law

Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

385 F.2d 648 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 12, 1967

Meanwhile, in Delta Air Lines v. … Board of Pub. Util. Comm’rs v. New York Tel. Co., 271 U.S. 23 , 46 S.Ct. 363 , 70 L.Ed. 808 (1926). 30 . City of Detroit v. FPC, 97 U.S.App. D.C. 260, 230 F.2d 810 (1955), cert. denied sub nom. Panhandle E.

Riffin v. Surface Transportation Board

331 F. App'x 751 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 22, 2009

Gorman v. NTSB, 558 F.3d 580, 586 (D.C.Cir.2009) (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted); see Clifton Power Corp. v. … Nor is it of any moment that Riffin’s petition to reopen has by now been denied by the Board. Sec Clifton Power Corp., 294 F.3d at 112 ; TeleSTAR, Inc. v. FCC, 888 F.2d 132, 134 (D.C.Cir.1989) (per curiam).

Douglas Foods Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

251 F.3d 1056 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 12, 2001

its weight,' " Schaeff, Inc. v. … NLRB v.

Cleveland Construction, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

44 F.3d 1010 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 24, 1995

Synergy Gas Corp v. N.L.R.B., 19 F.3d 649, 651 (D.C.Cir.1994). A bargaining unit determination will not stand if arbitrary and without substantial evidence. International Bhd. of Elec. Workers, Local 171 v. … The Board’s opinion in this ease, however, is completely silent on the relationship between Deklewa and Dezcon. The agency is not free to ignore its precedent without explanation. Michigan Consol. Gas Co. v.

Kenneth P. Prill v. National Labor Relations Board

835 F.2d 1481 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 31, 1987

On petition for review of that order, in Prill v. NLRB, 755 F,2d 941 (D.C.Cir.1985) (“Prill I"), we remanded to the Board for further consideration. … The Board also explained why it does not believe that there would be a chilling effect on other workers if Prill were not reinstated. In NLRB v.

Truserv Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

254 F.3d 1105 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 6, 2001

The Board distinguished NLRB v. … We remand this issue for consideration by the Board. See Grondorf, Field, Black & Co. v. NLRB, 107 F.3d 882, 888 (D.C. Cir. 1997); Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat Hospital v.

Local 483 v. National Labor Relations Board

288 F.2d 166 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 22, 1961

288 F.2d 166 109 U.S.App.D.C. 382 LOCAL 483, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF BOILERMAKERS, IRON SHIP BUILDERS, BLACKSMITHS, FORGERS & HELPERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, et al., Petitioners, v. … See American Potash & Chemical Corp., 107 N.L.R.B. 1418 (1954) 3 Midwest Piping and Supply Co., 63 N.L.R.B. 1060 (1945) 4 See Jones, Self-Determination v.

Detroit Newspaper Agency v. National Labor Relations Board

435 F.3d 302 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 20, 2006

furnishes, including the body of evidence opposed to the Board’s view.’ ” Epilepsy Found, of NE Ohio v. … We made clear in Epilepsy Foundation of Northeast Ohio v.

John E. Brown v. I.T.T./Continental Baking Company And Insurance Company Of North America

921 F.2d 289 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 11, 1990

Brown appealed to the Board. 7 The Board did not address the question of whether Brown's 1983 claim for the 1981 accident was time-barred. J.A. 177. … Sec. 921 (c), renders court "unable to decide an issue not reached by the Board"); Todd Shipyards Corp. v.

Leon E. Barnum v. National Transportation Safety Board

595 F.2d 869 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 14, 1979

Wilson v. … The Board ruled that air safety and the public interest required affirmation of the 150-day suspension. In Administrator v. Whitaker, 1 N.Tran.

Rex H. Reed v. National Labor Relations Board

927 F.2d 1249 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 15, 1991

See also Getman v. NLRB, 450 F.2d 670, 680 (D.C.Cir.1971) (Excelsior lists “do not in any direct sense reveal anything about the Board’s operations”). Cf. Ray v. U.S. … Grand Lodge v.

Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

280 F.2d 636 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 2, 1961

Transcontinental & Western Air v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 1949, 336 U.S. 601 , 69 S.Ct. 756 , 93 L.Ed. 911 . 3 . Summerfield v. … Transcontinental & Western Air v. Civil Aeronautics Board, supra, 336 U.S. at page 606 , 69 S.Ct. at page 758 . 5 . Summerfield v.

Brown v. Prince Georges County Police Department

368 F. App'x 147 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 8, 2010

See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004). That rule requires “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a).

Air Transport Associates, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

199 F.2d 181 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 19, 1953

In this respect the opinions in Civil Aeronautics Board v. Modern Air Transport, 7 Boyce Motor Lines v. United States, 8 and Brady Transfer & Storage Co. v. United States 9 are pertinent. … See Certificate to the Supreme Court in No. 11115, Civil Aeronautics Board v.

Farmland Industries, Inc. v. Grain Board of Iraq

904 F.2d 732 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 12, 1990

See Howard University v. Best, 484 A.2d 958, 966-67 (D.C.1984); Glekas v. Boss & Phelps, Inc., 437 A.2d 584, 587 (D.C.1981); 1901 Wyoming Avenue Cooperative Ass’n v. Lee, 345 A.2d 456 , 461 n. 8 (D.C.1975). … Supply Co. v. Continental Ins.

Enloe Medical Center v. National Labor Relations Board

433 F.3d 834 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 23, 2005

Printing Div. v. NLRB, 501 U.S. 190, 202-03 (1991) (citing Local Union 1395, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. NLRB, 797 F.2d 1027, 1030-31 (D.C. Cir. 1986)); see also BP Amoco Corp. v. … The Board developed this approach to contract interpretation by analogy from a case in a different context. In First National Maintenance Corp. v.

Railway Express Agency v. Civil Aeronautics Board

243 F.2d 422 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 28, 1957

See Ayrshire Collieries Corp. v. … United States, 292 U.S. 282, 288 , 54 S.Ct. 692 , 78 L.Ed. 1260 ; Lang v.

North Central Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

363 F.2d 983 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 15, 1966

The Board says we have no jurisdiction because the communication sought to be reviewed is not reviewable under the rule of Mohawk Airlines, Inc. v. CAB. 6 We disagree. … United States v. American Trucking Ass’ns, 310 U.S. 534, 542-543 , 60 S.Ct. 1059 , 84 L.Ed. 1345 (1940). 6 . 117 U.S.App.D.C. 326 , 329 F.2d 894 (D. C. Cir.1964).

Pall Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

275 F.3d 116 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 4, 2002

Local 24, Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters v. … Corp. v.

Communications Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

99 F. App'x 233 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 24, 2004

Utility Workers Union of America, Local 246, AFL-CIO v. NLRB, 39 F.3d 1210, 1213 (D.C.Cir.1994). … No. 139, at 4, 2003 WL 22012216 (2003) (J.A. 4); see NLRB v.