Case law

Brown v. Sellers

292 F. 655 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 3, 1923

Dennis A. Dickson v. Secretary of Defense

68 F.3d 1396 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 31, 1995

This court has not previously decided whether waiver determinations of the Board are reviewable. See Kendall v. … See, e.g., Guerrero v. Stone, 970 F.2d 626, 635 (9th Cir.1992) (Board’s decision was ''arbitrary, capricious and unsupported by substantial evidence"); Evans v.

Brown v. Slocum

30 App. D.C. 576 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 10, 1908

Counsel for appellant rely on the case of Lawrence v. Middle States Loan, Bldg. & Constr. Co. 7 App. D. C. 161. In that case the loan was for $4,000, and there was deducted, under the guise of a commission, $688. … In McBroom v. Scottish Mortg. & Land Invest. Co. 153 U. S. 318, 328 , 38 L. ed. 729, 783, 14 Sup. Ct.

Marx v. Brown

18 F.2d 827 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 4, 1927

The Commissioner, after an analysis of the evidence, concurred in the views of the board and awarded priority to Brown. … The board found that the invention was made by Brown before Marx entered the field and was publicly used more ' than two years before the filing date of either party.

Montgomery v. Brown

25 App. D.C. 490 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 2, 1905

It is the rule laid down in Smith v. … See also the cases of Wright v. Holcomb, 5 App. D. C. 76; Smith v. Bell, 6 Pet. 68 , 8 L. ed. 322; Brant v. Virginia Coal & I. Co. 93 U. S. 326 , 23 L. ed. 927; Potter v. Couch, 141 U. S. 316 , 35 L. ed. 732, 11 Sup.

CC1 Limited Partnership v. NLRB

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 3, 2018

Corp. v. NLRB, 863 F.2d 964, 967 (D.C. Cir. 1988) (stating that the Board “can infer from falsity of employer’s stated reason for discharge that motive is unlawful” (citing Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. … Ctr., Inc. v.

Brown v. Campbell

41 App. D.C. 499 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 2, 1914

The Examiner of Interferences and the Board of Examiners in Chief, after an unusually exhaustive and satisfactory analysis of the evidence, found that Campbell had established a conception and reduction to practice in February … VTe therefore agree with the Office that the case is ruled by Mason v. Hepburn, 13 App. D. C. 86; Richards v. Burkholder, 29 App. D. C. 485; Gordon v. Wentworth, 31 App. D. C. 150, and other cases in this court.

Donovan v. Brown

124 F.2d 295 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 10, 1941

Martin v. Washington Times Co., 67 App.D.C. 11 , 89 F.2d 230 . It is a salutary rule that errors which the trial court is given no opportunity to correct will not, in general, be considered on appeal. Affirmed.

Brown v. Winston

197 F.2d 601 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 29, 1952

Brown wrote Mrs. Rosa Jones a letter, which recited that he had learned that her son did not want to sell the property. He told Mrs. … After public hearing the Commission made findings of fact and conclusions of law and suspended Brown’s license as a real estate and business chance broker for a period of sixty days.

Brown v. Holt

221 F.2d 113 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 14, 1955

Brown v. O'Brien

469 F.2d 563 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 5, 1972

In Mitchum v. … In the companion case of Perez v.

Brown v. Califano

627 F.2d 1221 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 31, 1980

First, Brown v. Board of Education, 6 held that the Constitution demands the dismantling of dual school systems, intentionally segregated by race. Second, Cooper v. … North Carolina State Board of Education v.

Banneker Ventures, LLC v. Jim Graham

798 F.3d 1119 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 18, 2015

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (internal quotation marks omitted). … The district court relied extensively on Carr v. Brown, 395 A.2d 79, 82 (D.C. 1978).

Gwin v. Brown

21 App. D.C. 295 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 3, 1903

Koshkonong v. Burton, supra; Cooley, Const. Lim. (6th ed.) 449, 450; Terry v. Anderson, 95 U. S. 628 . See also Price v. Hopkins, 13 Mich. 318 ; Call v. Hagger, 8 Mass. 423, 430 ; Society v. … Wheeler, 2 Gall, 106; Hart v. Bostwick, 14 Fla. 162 .

Steven Drielak v. Scott Pruitt

890 F.3d 297 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 15, 2018

See Williams v. Runyon, Appeal No. 01931274, 1993 WL 1506710, at *2 (EEOC Apr. 7, 1993); Spencer v. … Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C. Cir. 1999). While actions other than an outright firing or demotion can be adverse, a claim based on less must “rest on a significant change in [] job responsibilities.”

United States v. Jackson, Tarry

415 F.3d 88 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 22, 2005

United States v. (Monte) Brown, 374 F.3d 1326, 1328 (D.C.Cir.2004) *90 (quoting United States v. Davis, 458 F.2d 819, 821 (D.C.Cir.1972)); see also Illinois v. … United States v. (Rocky Lee) Brown, 334 F.3d 1161 , 1172 n. 8 (D.C.Cir.2003) (quoting United States v. Christian, 187 F.3d 663, 670 (D.C.Cir.1999)) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Devenpeck v.

Prindle v. Brown

24 App. D.C. 114 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 8, 1904

Trufant and Brown each appealed to the Examiners-in-Chief, who, coming to the conclusion that Brown was the first to conceive as well as to reduce to.practice, reversed the decision and awarded priority to Brown. … Foster v. Antisdel, 14 App. D. C. 552, 555, and cases there cited.

Brown v. Waring

1 App. D.C. 378 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 7, 1893

Davis v. Alvord, 94 U. S., 545 . … Davis v. Alvord, supra. 3. The question as to the waiver of the lien by talcing the promissory notes of the owner, need not be considered. In the view we have -taken of the case it becomes quite unnecessary.

United States v. Brown

449 F.3d 154 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 2, 2006

See United States v. … None of the officers had yet read Brown his rights. But the police officer’s inquiries fall squarely within the public-safety exception to Miranda v.

Brown v. Harvey

168 F. App'x 452 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 31, 2005