Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscadc

10,000+ results

1.56s

  • Rail-Term Corp. v. Railroad Retirement Board

    666 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 3, 2016

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Duchek v. National Transportation Safety Board

    364 F.3d 311 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 20, 2004

    Administrator v. Duchek, NTSB Order No. EA-5040 (May 23, 2003), at 4–5 (Board Order). … Thomas Jefferson Univ. v. Shalala, 512 U.S. 504, 512 (1994) (citing, inter alia, Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1, 16 (1965)).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Santos v. Merit Systems Protection Board

    21 F. App'x 5 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 12, 2001

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United Steelworkers v. National Labor Relations Board

    401 F.2d 434 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 3, 1968

    The Board was plainly justified in finding no unfair labor practice; this was a small matter resulting from “circumstances which the Board could or should accept as excusing or justifying unilateral action.” NLRB v. … E. g., NLRB v. Southland Cork Co., supra. The Company, on the other hand, urges that the Board should have tolled the back-pay provisions until the date of its order.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Ceridian Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

    435 F.3d 352 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 27, 2006

    Cassell v. FCC, 154 F.3d 478, 483 (D.C. Cir. 1998); see Boca Airport, Inc. v. FAA, 389 F.3d 185, 190 (D.C. Cir. 2004); U.S. Telecom Ass’n v. FCC, 295 F.3d 1326, 1332 (D.C. Cir. 2002); Global Crossing Telecomms., Inc. v. … ITT Indus., Inc. v. NLRB, 251 F.3d 995, 999 (D.C. Cir. 2001) (quoting Lechmere, Inc. v. NLRB, 502 U.S. 527, 536 (1992) (citing Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 842-43 (1984))).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • National Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    392 F.2d 504 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 29, 1968

    Delta Air Lines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 46 , 228 F.2d 17 (1955); cf. Pan American-Grace Airways v. … Delta Air Lines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 46 , 50, 228 F.2d 17 , 21 (1955). . Delta Air Lines v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Washington Board of Trade v. McLaughlin

    267 F.2d 633 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 12, 1959

    This suit was brought in the District Court by various employers within the District of Columbia (1) to declare invalid an agreement made between the District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board and the Secretary … See, e. g., Eecles v. Peoples Bank, 1948, 333 U.S. 426 , 68 S.Ct. 641 , 92 L.Ed. 784 ; State of California v. Latimer, 1938, 305 U.S. 255 , 59 S.Ct. 166 , 83 L.Ed. 159 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Local 808 v. National Mediation Board

    888 F.2d 1428 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 23, 1990

    R.R. v. … Ry. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Schaeff Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board

    113 F.3d 264 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 27, 1997

    We reject the Board’s factual findings only if they are not supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole. See Universal Camera Corp. v. … Schaeff and the Board dispute the impact of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Office of Workers' Compensation v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

    501 F.2d 794 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 21, 1974

    Though Congress has vested in the Board “the fullest jurisdictional breadth constitutionally permissible under the Commerce Clause,” NLRB v. … The Board similarly misplaces reliance on Local No. 5, United Ass’n of Journeymen etc. of Plumbing etc. Industry v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    365 F.2d 939 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 19, 1966

    was to be left to the Board; and second, that this court’s decision in American Airlines, Inc., et al. v. … See United States v. International Union United Auto, etc., Workers, 352 U.S. 567, 585 (1950); Nicholas v. Denver & R. G. W. R. Co., 195 F.2d 428 (10th Cir. 1952); Duplex Printing Press Co. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Timsco Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    819 F.2d 1173 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 2, 1987

    See NLRB v. A.J. Tower Co., 329 U.S. 324, 330 , 67 S.Ct. 324, 327 , 91 L.Ed. 322 (1946) (citing Southern S.S. Co. v. NLRB, 316 U.S. 31, 37 , 62 S.Ct. 886, 889 , 86 L.Ed. 1246 (1942); NLRB v. Waterman S.S. … NLRB v. Knogo Corp., 727 F.2d 55, 58 (2d Cir.1984).

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Hughes Air Corp. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    492 F.2d 567 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 5, 1973

    See, e. g., American Airlines, Inc. v. … Board procedures for approval of this type of agreement were the subject of our decision in Air Line Pilots Ass’n v. CAB, supra, page 571. .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Indiana Boxcar Corporation v. Railroad Retirement Board

    712 F.3d 590 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 9, 2013

    See FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc., 556 U.S. 502, 515 (2009). … Until now, the Board used the definition of “common control” found in Union Pacific, a Federal Circuit case. Union Pacific Corp. v. United States, 5 F.3d 523 (Fed.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Blackmon-Malloy v. United States Capitol Police Board

    575 F.3d 699 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 31, 2009

    For example, in Baldwin County Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147 (1984), which appellants cite, the Supreme Court explicitly notes this holding in Zipes. Id. at 152 n.6. … The Police Board relies on the general rule that, absent exceptional circumstances, this court will not entertain arguments not made in the district court, see, e.g., Meijer, Inc. v.

    Cited 107 timesPublished
  • Van Dyke v. National Transportation Safety Board

    286 F.3d 594 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 23, 2002

    Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 (1938)), taking "into account whatever in the record fairly detracts from its weight" (Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 488 (1951)). See Lindsay v. Nat'l Transp. … If there is no substantial evidence to support the Board's reasoning - and there is none here - its order must be vacated. See SEC v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Adam J. Bertamini v. Railroad Retirement Board

    440 F.2d 278 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 23, 1971

    For similar statements regarding the scope of judicial review of decisions of the Board, see Gloss v. Railroad Retirement Board, 114 U.S.App.D.C. 177 , 313 F.2d 568 (1962) ; Aldridge v. … Compare Duncan v. Railroad Retirement Board, 4 Cir., 375 F.2d 915 (1967) ; Gardner v. Earnest, 4 Cir., 371 F.2d 606 (1967). 5 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • BNSF Railway Co. v. Surface Transportation Board

    741 F.3d 163 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 31, 2014

    Co. v. STB, 526 F.3d 770, 776-77 (D.C.Cir.2008). … Co. v. STB, 604 F.3d 602, 604 (D.C.Cir.2010) ('WFA I).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Consolidated Communications, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    837 F.3d 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 13, 2016

    v. … See Midwest Regional Joint Board v. NLRB, 564 F.2d 434 , 440 (D.C.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Elizabeth MacKenzie v. D.C. Unemployment Compensation Board

    393 F.2d 659 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 16, 1968

    This dismissal was affirmed by the Board and the District Court. … See Gregory v. United States, 102 Ct.Cl. 642, 662-64 , 57 F.Supp. 962, 973 (1944); Conner v. Miller, 154 Ohio St. 313 , 96 N.E.2d 13 (1950).

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.