Case law

CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Surface Transportation Board

754 F.3d 1056 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 20, 2014

Co. v. STB, 604 F.3d 602, 604 (D.C. Cir. 2010) (WFA I). … See Vill. of Barrington v. STB, 636 F.3d 650, 660 (D.C. Cir. 2011). The Board satisfied this burden.

William J. Goodson v. Railroad Retirement Board

595 F.2d 881 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 16, 1979

Rivas v. Weinberger, 475 F.2d 255, 258 (5th Cir. 1973). … But the Board must demonstrate that a claimant can engage in “(substantial services with reasonable regularity in some competitive employment .” Rivas v. Weinberger, supra, 475 F.2d at 258 .

Grainbelt Corp. v. Surface Transportation Board

109 F.3d 794 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 4, 1997

Co. v. ICC, 736 F.2d 708 , 717 (D.C.Cir.1984). The Commission also has broad authority to impose protective conditions to govern mergers. 49 U.S.C. § 11344 (c); see Lamoille Valley R.R. v. … (quoting Industrial Union Dept., AFL-CIO v. Hodgson, 499 F.2d 467, 476 (D.C.Cir. 1974)).

Conagra, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

117 F.3d 1435 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 8, 1997

See International Woodworkers v. NLRB, 263 F.2d 483 , 485 (D.C.Cir.1959). In NLRB v. … United Steelworkers Local 14534 v. NLRB, 983 F.2d 240 , 244 (D.C.Cir.1993). Subsequently, however, in response to a trilogy of Seventh Circuit decisions, the Board underwent a “change of heart.” Id. First came NLRB v.

Rasmussen v. National Transportation Safety Board

100 F. App'x 836 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 10, 2004

This petition for review of an order of the National Transportation Safety Board was considered on the briefs and appendix filed by the parties. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j).

National Labor Relations Board v. Willard, Inc.

98 F.2d 244 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 18, 1938

Respondent having failed to comply with the Board’s order, the Board petitioned this court pursuant to section 10 (e) of the act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 160 (e). … In the case of Webb, it would be hard to support any other finding than the one which the Board made. We hold that the Board’s order is valid and must be enforced. Petition granted.

Grainbelt Corporation v. Surface Transportation Board

109 F.3d 794 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 4, 1997

Louis Mackall, V, Attorney, Surface Transportation Board, argued the cause for respondents, with whom Henri F. Rush, General Counsel, Joel I. Klein, Acting Assistant Attorney General, U.S. … Co. v.

Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

194 F.2d 339 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 18, 1952

Court of Appeals, District of Columbia, April 6, 1949 [State Airlines, Inc., v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 84 U.S.App.D. … Supreme Court in the case of Ashbacker Radio Corporation v.

PPL Montana, LLC v. Surface Transportation Board

437 F.3d 1240 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 17, 2006

Before: GINSBURG , Chief Judge, and GARLAND and BROWN , Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN . … BROWN , Circuit Judge: PPL Montana, LLC (PPL) filed a complaint with the Surface Transportation Board, alleging the rail rates charged by intervenor BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) were unreasonably high.

Mohawk Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

329 F.2d 894 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 20, 1964

After protracted correspondence, the Board wrote a letter to Mohawk on May 15, 1963, in which it said, inter alia: “* * * [T]he Board has determined to disallow those claimed extra section miles on which no passengers were … United States v. Jones, 336 U.S. 641, 649 , 69 S.Ct. 787 , 93 L.Ed. 938 (1949).

William B. Andrews v. Railroad Retirement Board

595 F.2d 676 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 26, 1978

v. … Consolidated Edison Co. v. Labor Board, 305 U.S. 197, 229 [, 59 S.Ct. 206, 217 , 83 L.Ed. 126, 140 (1938)].

American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

231 F.2d 483 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 9, 1956

The legality of this experiment has been determined by this court in Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad v. … Eastern Airlines, Inc., v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 87 U.S.App.D.C. 331 , 185 F.2d 426, 428 , vacated 1950, 341 U.S. 901 , 71 S.Ct. 613 , 95 L.Ed. 1341 .

Golden Holiday Tours v. Civil Aeronautics Board

531 F.2d 624 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 3, 1976

Petitioners sought Board review of the staff action, and on 16 August 1974 the Board granted the petition for review and affirmed the staff action. … Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 125 , 93 S.Ct. 705, 712 , 35 L.Ed.2d 147, 161 (1973); Southern Pac. Term. Co. v. ICC, 219 U.S. 498, 515 , 31 S.Ct. 279, 283 , 55 L.Ed. 310, 316 (1911). See also DeFunis v.

Seattle Opera v. National Labor Relations Board

292 F.3d 757 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 11, 2002

(f); see Alois Box Co. v. … Huizinga Cartage Co. v.

Khaksari v. Chairman, Broadcasting Board of Governors

451 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 28, 2011

The same argument was raised in Nyunt v. … See Davis v.

Civil Aeronautics Board v. Deutsche Lufthansa Aktiengesellschaft

591 F.2d 951 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 8, 1979

pertaining to denied boarding (“bumping”) of passengers who have confirmed reserved space. … FTC v. Texaco, Inc., 180 U.S.App.D.C. 390, 407 , 555 F.2d 862 , 879 (en banc), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 974 , 97 S.Ct. 2940 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1072 (1977); SEC v.

Saturn Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

476 F.2d 907 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 9, 1973

International Union, United Auto Workers v. NLRB, 126 U. S.App.D.C. 11, 373 F.2d 671 (1967). … On November 13, 1972 acting Chief Judge Wright granted an unopposed motion to consolidate the seven petitions for review that were in this court as a result of the second circuit’s transfer order. .Compare Skelly Oil Co. v.

Pace University v. National Labor Relations Board

514 F.3d 19 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 25, 2008

Co. v. NLRB, 386 F.3d 1160, 1163-64 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Ryerson & Son, Inc. v. NLRB, 216 F.3d 1146, 1151-52 (D.C. Cir. 2000) (quoting Thomas-Davis Med. Ctrs. v. NLRB, 157 F.3d 909, 912 (D.C. Cir. 1998)); see Wackenhut Corp. v. NLRB, 178 F.3d 543, 552-53 (D.C.

Warriors v. National Labor Relations Board

50 F. App'x 3 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 15, 2002

This cause was considered on the record compiled before the National Labor Relations Board and was argued by counsel. … It is *4 ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for review is denied, and the order of the National Labor Relations Board is enforced.

Santos v. Merit Systems Protection Board

21 F. App'x 5 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 12, 2001