Case law

Saturn Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

483 F.2d 1284 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 11, 1973

Almost seven years ago we introduced our opinion in American Airlines, Inc. v. … See generally American Airlines, Inc. v. CAB, supra, 365 F.2d at 944-945 .

Bell v. National Labor Relations Board

259 F.3d 719 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 10, 2001

See Detroit Edison Co. v. NLRB, 440 U.S. 301, 303 (1979); Country Ford Trucks, Inc. v. NLRB, 229 F.3d 1184, 1191 (D.C. … Allentown Mack Sales & Serv., Inc. v. NLRB, 522 U.S. 359, 361 (1998); see NLRB v. Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc., 494 U.S. 775, 778 (1990).

Brown v. Upper Marlboro Town Police

360 F. App'x 163 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 5, 2010

See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004). That rule requires “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief....” Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a).

American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

192 F.2d 417 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 27, 1951

These are petitions to review 1 an order of the Civil Aeronautics Board. … We had the same general problem before us in United Air Lines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 5 and the Supreme Court adverted to it in United States v.

Railroad Retirement Board v. Duquesne Warehouse Co.

149 F.2d 507 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 14, 1945

In the case of Duquesne Warehouse Co. v. … McCaughn v. Hershey Chocolate Co., 1931, 283 U.S. 488, 493, 494 , 51 S.Ct. 510 , 75 L.Ed. 1183 . 4 Cir. 1944, 144 F.2d 130 . Skidmore v.

Brown v. Howard County Police Department

358 F. App'x 186 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 2, 2009

See, e.g., Ciralsky v. CIA 355 F.3d 661, 668 (D.C.Cir.2004). Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published.

Brockton Hospital v. National Labor Relations Board

294 F.3d 100 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 28, 2002

Workers v. NLRB, 215 F.3d 11, 15 (D.C. Cir. 2000).  The Hospital challenges all the Board's determinations that it violated s 8(a)(1). … Galloway Co. v. NLRB, 856 F.2d 275, 280-81 (D.C.

CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Surface Transportation Board

754 F.3d 1056 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 20, 2014

Co. v. STB, 604 F.3d 602, 604 (D.C. Cir. 2010) (WFA I). … See Vill. of Barrington v. STB, 636 F.3d 650, 660 (D.C. Cir. 2011). The Board satisfied this burden.

American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

235 F.2d 845 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 19, 1956

v. … Ed. 1341 (1951); New England Air Express v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 90 U.S.

Bellagio, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

854 F.3d 703 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 25, 2017

Vol, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, entered an appearance.  2 Before: BROWN, Circuit Judge, and EDWARDS and SENTELLE, Senior Circuit Judges. … See Tasty Baking Co. v. NLRB, 254 F.3d 114, 125 (D.C. Cir. 2001). The Board analyzes the question of unlawful retaliation by applying the test enunciated in Wright Line, 251 NLRB 1083 (1980). See NLRB v. Transp. Mgmt.

Associated Press v. National Labor Relations Board

492 F.2d 662 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 20, 1974

NLRB v. Auburn Rubber Co., 10 Cir., 384 F.2d 1 (1967); Ramsey v. NLRB, supra note 1, 327 F.2d 784 . See also language favorable to the Spielberg policy in NLRB v. … Assn of Machinists & Aerospace Wkrs v. Fraser & Johnston Co., 9 Cir., 454 F.2d 88, 91 (1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 920 , 92 S.Ct. 1775 , 32 L.Ed.2d 119 (1972); NLRB v.

William J. Goodson v. Railroad Retirement Board

595 F.2d 881 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 16, 1979

Rivas v. Weinberger, 475 F.2d 255, 258 (5th Cir. 1973). … But the Board must demonstrate that a claimant can engage in “(substantial services with reasonable regularity in some competitive employment .” Rivas v. Weinberger, supra, 475 F.2d at 258 .

Hicks v. National Labor Relations Board

880 F.2d 1396 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 28, 1989

The ALJ again found jurisdiction, and this time the Board affirmed, limiting its discussion of jurisdiction to a half-page footnote. Hicks v. AFGE Local 3430, 290 NLRB No. 84 (1988). … We therefore remand the case to the Board, for further action either consistent with its existing precedents or for generation of a new jurisdictional rule. Compare NLRB v.

Conagra, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

117 F.3d 1435 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 8, 1997

See International Woodworkers v. NLRB, 263 F.2d 483 , 485 (D.C.Cir.1959). In NLRB v. … United Steelworkers Local 14534 v. NLRB, 983 F.2d 240 , 244 (D.C.Cir.1993). Subsequently, however, in response to a trilogy of Seventh Circuit decisions, the Board underwent a “change of heart.” Id. First came NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Downtown Bid Services Corp.

682 F.3d 109 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 22, 2012

, LLC v. … In NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Willard, Inc.

98 F.2d 244 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 18, 1938

Respondent having failed to comply with the Board’s order, the Board petitioned this court pursuant to section 10 (e) of the act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 160 (e). … In the case of Webb, it would be hard to support any other finding than the one which the Board made. We hold that the Board’s order is valid and must be enforced. Petition granted.

Grainbelt Corporation v. Surface Transportation Board

109 F.3d 794 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 4, 1997

Louis Mackall, V, Attorney, Surface Transportation Board, argued the cause for respondents, with whom Henri F. Rush, General Counsel, Joel I. Klein, Acting Assistant Attorney General, U.S. … Co. v.

PPL Montana, LLC v. Surface Transportation Board

437 F.3d 1240 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 17, 2006

Before: GINSBURG , Chief Judge, and GARLAND and BROWN , Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN . … BROWN , Circuit Judge: PPL Montana, LLC (PPL) filed a complaint with the Surface Transportation Board, alleging the rail rates charged by intervenor BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) were unreasonably high.

Norris, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

177 F.2d 26 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 27, 1949

F. of L. v. National Labor Relations Board, 1940, 308 U.S. 401 , 60 S.Ct. 300 , 84 L.Ed. 347 ; Inland Empire Dist. Council v. Millis, 1945, 325 U.S. 697 , 65 S.Ct. 1316 , 89 L.Ed. 1877 ; May Dept. Stores Co. v. … National Labor Relations Board, 1945, 326 U.S. 376, 388 , 66 S.Ct. 203 , 90 L.Ed. 145 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Falk Corp., 1940, 308 U.S. 453, 459 , 60 S.Ct. 307 , 84 L.Ed. 396 .

Village of Barrington v. Surface Transportation Board

758 F.3d 326 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 18, 2014

In ICC v. … Bend, Ind. v. STB, 566 F.3d 1166, 1171 (D.C.