Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscadc

10,000+ results

0.81s

  • Shima v. Brown

    133 F.2d 48 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 18, 1943

    Sibbach v. Wilson & Co., Inc., 312 U.S. 1 , 61 S.Ct. 422 , 85 L.Ed. 479 . D.C.Code 1940, §§ 28—2707, 28—2708, 31 Stat. 1378 . Fries, Beall & Sharp Co. v. Livingstone, 56 App.D.C. 209 , 12 F.2d 150 . … New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad Co. v. Estill, 147 U.S. 591, 622, 623 , 13 S.Ct. 444, 456 , 37 L.Ed. 292 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Amobi v. Brown

    317 F. Supp. 3d 29 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 19, 2018

    See Bourjaily v. … Report for Derrick history Brown 89.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Mabus

    548 F. App'x 623 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 26, 2013

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Commissioner

    697 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 15, 2017

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Reynolds v. Brown

    690 F. App'x 5 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 16, 2017

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Rudberg

    171 F.2d 831 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 20, 1948

    The plaintiffs, Rudberg and O’Neill, and defendant Brown entered into a written “Agreement”, whereby Brown agreed to sell and the plaintiffs agreed to buy the defendant’s liquor store located in the District of Columbia. … See. 32 of Rules and Regulations of Alcoholic Beverage Control Board for the District of Columbia, pursuant to 48 Stat. 322 (1934), D.C.Code § 25 — 107 (1940).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Hill

    686 F. App'x 6 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 16, 2017

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Califano

    627 F.2d 1221 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 31, 1980

    First, Brown v. Board of Education, 6 held that the Constitution demands the dismantling of dual school systems, intentionally segregated by race. Second, Cooper v. … North Carolina State Board of Education v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Slater

    23 App. D.C. 51 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 5, 1904

    to get possession of that property, as *57 against a dishonest mortgagor seeking to retain snch possession, was by way of the action of ejectment, as held by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Willis v. … this class of cases is not among those enumerated in § § 8, 9, and 10 of the Code, which might be so transferred by writ of certiorari, it would remain subject to the rule laid down by this court in the case of Hendley v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Hartz Mountain Corporation v. Donald L. Dotson, Chairman, National Labor Relations Board

    727 F.2d 1308 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 24, 1984

    In Leedom v. … In Bell & Howell Co. v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Vilsack

    866 F. Supp. 2d 23 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 11, 2012

    B (Letter to plaintiff from Philip Miller, Paralegal Specialist, Office of the Clerk of the Board, U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board, dated June 30, 2010). … .”); see also Anderson v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Petersen

    25 App. D.C. 359 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 4, 1905

    Crane v. Morris, 6 Pet. 598 , 8 L. ed. 514; Kelly v. Jack *364 son, 6 Pet. 622 , 8 L. ed. 523; United States v. Wiggins, 14 Pet. 334 , 10 L. ed. 481; Quock Ting v. United States, 140 U. S. 417 , 35 L. ed. 501, 11 Sup. … Rep. 733, 851; The City of New York (Alexandre v. Machan) 147 U. S. 72 , 37 L. ed. 84, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 211. We find no error in tbe record, and tbe judgment appealed from must therefore be affirmed, with costs.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Bell v. Brown

    128 F.2d 317 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 11, 1942

    Gunning v. Cooley, 281 U.S. 90, 95 , 50 S.Ct. 231 , 74 L.Ed. 720 ; Jackson v. Capital Transit Co., 69 App.D.C. 147 , 99 F.2d 380 , and cases there cited.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Georgetown Hotel v. National Labor Relations Board

    835 F.2d 1467 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 29, 1987

    In Linden Lumber Division v. … See Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Int’l Union v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Jameson v. Brown

    109 F.2d 830 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 29, 1939

    Grady v. Garland, supra. A liquor store across a wide and busy street is not the same thing as a liquor store on one’s own side. … In Castleman v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Hill

    573 F. App'x 3 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 25, 2014

    See Earle v. District of Columbia, 707 F.3d 299, 305 (D.C.Cir.2012).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Canonsburg General Hospital v. Sylvia Mathews Burwell

    807 F.3d 295 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 1, 2015

    See Provider Reimbursement Review Board Decision 41–42. … See Provider Reimbursement Review Board Decision 43–44 (citing St. Luke’s, 315 F.3d at 988–89).

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • Field v. Brown

    610 F.2d 981 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 13, 1979

    Communist Party v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 367 U.S. 1, 72 , 81 S.Ct. 1357, 1397 , 6 L.Ed.2d 625 (1961). … Communist Party v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 367 U.S. at 71 , 81 S.Ct. at 1397 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Dennis A. Dickson v. Secretary of Defense

    68 F.3d 1396 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 31, 1995

    This court has not previously decided whether waiver determinations of the Board are reviewable. See Kendall v. … See, e.g., Guerrero v. Stone, 970 F.2d 626, 635 (9th Cir.1992) (Board’s decision was ''arbitrary, capricious and unsupported by substantial evidence"); Evans v.

    Cited 265 timesPublished
  • Property Resources Corporation and Triboro Maintenance Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

    863 F.2d 964 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 16, 1988

    See NLRB v. … Southwire Co. v. NLRB, 820 F.2d 453, 460 (D.C.Cir.1987).

    Cited 15 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.