Case law

Jochims v. National Labor Relations Board

480 F.3d 1161 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 23, 2007

to the Court’s decision in NLRB v. … In its Supplemental Decision, however, the Board expressly retreated from any discussion of or reliance on NLRB v.

United States v. Charles R. Brown, (2 Cases)

663 F.2d 229 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 10, 1981

United States v. Brown, No. 77 — 2106 (D.C.Cir., Mar. 21, 1980). Rule 12(f), Fed.R.Crim.P. provides: Effect of Failure to Raise Defenses or Objections. … United States v. Smith, 179 U.S.App.D.C. 162, 168 , 551 F.2d 348, 354 (1976); United States v. Moore, supra; United States v.

Lee's Summit v. Surface Transportation Board

231 F.3d 39 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 14, 2000

United States v. Larionoff, 431 U.S. 864, 872 (1976); Bluestone Energy Design, Inc. v. FERC, 74 F.3d 1288, 1292 (D.C. … Improve- ment of existing track does not constitute "construction," and does not even trigger Board jurisdiction under 49 U.S.C. s 1091. City of Detroit v.

Brown Instrument Co. v. Warner Register of Copyrights

161 F.2d 910 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 2, 1947

We agree with the court that the opinion of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Taylor Instrument Companies v. … We think, moreover, that the case is controlled by Baker v. Selden, 101 U.S. 99 , 25 L.Ed. 841 . That case involved blank forms for use in bookkeeping.

Una Chapter v. National Mediation Board

294 F.2d 905 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 13, 1961

294 F.2d 905 111 U.S.App.D.C. 121 UNA CHAPTER, FLIGHT ENGINEERS' INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AFL-CIO, Appellant, v. NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD, Francis A. … The purpose of the Board (and similarly of its designated Committee) is to find facts. See Switchmen's Union v. N.M.R., supra at page 301 of 320 U.S., at page 97 of 64 S.Ct.

O'Carroll v. Civil Aeronautics Board

144 F.2d 993 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 9, 1944

the preliminary findings gave testimony at the Board’s hearing. … The order of the Board will be Affirmed. 49 U.S.C.A. § 646 .

Weigand v. National Labor Relations Board

783 F.3d 889 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 17, 2015

The Board’s decision regarding the Facebook postings is “the product of reasoned decisionmaking,” Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass’n of U.S. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. … Id.; see also NLRB v.

Cooper v. National Transportation Safety Board

660 F.3d 476 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 15, 2011

Before: ROGERS, GARLAND and BROWN, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court by Circuit Judge ROGERS. … It recited the applicable standard to prove intentional falsification, as set forth in Board precedent based on Hart v. McLucas, 535 F.2d 516, 519 (9th Cir. 1976).

Boorda v. Subversive Activities Control Board

421 F.2d 1142 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 12, 1969

See Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 606-607 , 87 S.Ct. 675 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967); Shelton v. Tucker, 364 U.S. 479, 488 , 81 S.Ct. 247 , 5 L.Ed.2d 231 (1960). … The Board relies upon Adler v. Board of Education, 342 U.S. 485, 494-495 , 72 S.Ct. 380 , 96 L.Ed. 517 , 27 A.L.R.2d 472 (1952), for the contrary proposition. But the Supreme Court in Keyishian v.

Czarra v. Board of Medical Supervisors

25 App. D.C. 443 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 2, 1905

Meffert v. State Bd. of Medical Registration, 66 Kan. 710 , 72 Pac. 247 ; State ex rel. Chapman v. State Medical Examiners, 34 Minn. 387 , 26 N. W. 123 ; State Bd. of Health v. Roy, 22 R. … Baldwin v.

Music Choice v. Copyright Royalty Board

774 F.3d 1000 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 19, 2014

COPYRIGHT ROYALTY BOARD, APPELLEE SIRIUS XM RADIO INC. … Music Choice has not persuaded us, through its citation to U.S. v.

United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 204 v. National Labor Relations Board

447 F.3d 821 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 5, 2006

Nor can Smithfield prevail on its claim that the Board may not require it to notify everyone the company has employed since 1993 of the Board’s decision. Upholding a similar notification order in Teamsters Local 115 v. … But “[a] party challenging the Board’s choice of remedy must show that the remedy is clearly inadequate in light of the findings of the Board.” Teamsters Local Union No. 639 v. NLRB, 924 F.2d 1078, 1085 (D.C.

Dupuy v. National Labor Relations Board

806 F.3d 556 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 17, 2015

Cir. 1986) (reversing as-yet unenforced Board orders); Jackman v. … The Board cited Amalgamated Utility Workers v.

People v. Civil Aeronautics Board

567 F.2d 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 14, 1977

We hold that it does not and affirm the Board’s orders. … The decisions of the Board granting exemptions are affirmed, but in so doing the Court is neither approving nor disapproving the “view” expressed in the 1975 Board orders. Affirmed. .

Ruisi v. National Labor Relations Board

856 F.3d 1031 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 16, 2017

Under this deferential standard of review, we will reverse the Board “only when the record is so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find to the contrary.” Bally’s Park Place, Inc. v. … Finally, “[w]here, as here, the Board adopts the ALJ’s findings and conclusions as its own, we apply the same deferential standard to those findings and conclusions.” Weigand v. NLRB, 783 F.3d 889, 895 (D.C.

Shepherd v. Merit System Protection Board

652 F.2d 1040 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 20, 1981

. § 317.302(a)(1)(v). … Creamery v. Wickard, 140 F.2d 485, 488 (7th Cir. 1944); United States v. Carpenter, 84 F.2d 813, 814 (10th Cir. 1936). .

Wheeler v. National Labor Relations Board

314 F.2d 260 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 10, 1963

Co. v. N. L. R. B., 162 F.2d 435 (7th Cir., 1947). And “refusal to hire for an available job * * * [is] clearly discriminatory.” Radio Officers’ Union of Commercial Telegraphers Union AFL v. N. L. R. … B. v. Bradley Washfountain Co., 192 F.2d 144, 153 (7th Cir. 1951).

Drivers v. National Labor Relations Board

273 F.2d 815 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 23, 1959

Pursuant to charges made by Virginia-Carolina Freight Lines, Inc., the General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board filed with the Board on August 26, 1958, a complaint alleging Highway Truck Drivers Local 107 of … The Teamsters union has petitioned for review of the Board’s order and the Board has asked us to enforce it.

Brown v. District of Columbia

143 F.2d 374 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 26, 1944

It is not necessary to consider this contention further as it was fully considered and decided in the recent case of Johnson & Wimsatt, Inc. v. … This question, also, has been considered and decided ad *375 versely to appellants in the case of Garfield Memorial Hospital v.

San Manuel Indian Bingo & Casino v. National Labor Relations Board

475 F.3d 1306 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 9, 2007

Before: GARLAND and BROWN, Circuit Judges, and WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. … BROWN, Circuit Judge: In this case, we consider whether the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) may apply the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.