Case law

Bannercraft Clothing Co. v. Renegotiation Board

466 F.2d 345 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 6, 1972

See, Switchmens Union of North America v. National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 (1943); cf. Reisman v. Caplin 375 U.S. 440, 450 , 84 S.Ct. 508 , 11 L.Ed.2d 459 (1964). … Renegotiation Board, the District Judge ordered production of the documents for in camera inspection so lie could evaluate the force of the Board’s arguments. Cf. Soucie v.

Pasternack v. National Transportation Safety Board

596 F.3d 836 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 26, 2010

Before: GINSBURG, BROWN, and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges. … The Board, in turn, affirmed the ALJ’s decision. See Adm’r v. Pasternack, NTSB Order No. EA-5443 (Apr. 27, 2009) (J.A. 394).

Board of County Commissioners v. DOT

955 F.3d 96 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 7, 2020

See City of Angels Broad., Inc. v. FCC, 745 F.2d 656, 663 (D.C. Cir. 1984); see also Butz v. Glover Livestock Comm’n Co., 411 U.S. 182, 185 (1973). … Ass’n of U.S., Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 463 U.S. 29, 52, 53 (1983); U.S. Telecom Ass’n v.

Frazier v. Merit Systems Protection Board

672 F.2d 150 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 2, 1982

See Dabney v. Freeman, 358 F.2d 533 (D.C. Cir. 1965); Paroczay v. Hodges, 297 F.2d 439 (D.C.Cir.1961); Christie v. U. S., 518 F.2d 584 (Ct.Cl.1975); Myslik v. Veteran’s Administration, 2 MSPB 241 (1980). . … Chapter v. Irving, 610 F.2d 1221 (4th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, sub nom. Assoc. Builders v.

Railroad Retirement Board v. Bates

126 F.2d 642 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 24, 1942

After the Railroad Retirement Board had decided' in the affirmative, Miss Bates filed a complaint in the District Court under the authority of section 11, and prayed that the Court set aside the Board’s decision on the limited … The Board moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.

Roberts v. National Labor Relations Board

350 F.2d 427 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 21, 1965

Also see, the National Labor Relations Board, Rules and Regulations Series 8, as amended, Section 102.9. . Hercules Powder Co. v. N. L. R. B., 297 F.2d 424, 433 (C.A.5). . … International Ladies Garment Workers’ Union, AFL-CIO (Bernhard-Altmann) v. N. L. R. B., 366 U.S. 731, 737-738 , 81 S.Ct. 1603 , 6 L.Ed.2d 762 . . 105 Cong.Rec. 6847, 9108 (daily ed.

Settling Devotional v. Copyright Royalty Board

797 F.3d 1106 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 14, 2015

The Copyright Royalty Board Matthew J. … Our review is “highly deferential,” Intercollegiate Broadcast Sys., Inc. v. Copyright Royalty Board, 571 F.3d 69, 79 (D.C.

Hourihan v. National Labor Relations Board

201 F.2d 187 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 6, 1953

F. of L. v. National Labor Relations Board, 10 Cir., 1950, 179 F.2d 492 ; Lincourt v. National Labor Relations Board, 1 Cir., 1948, 170 F.2d 306 . 4 . … Compare Jacobsen v. National Labor Relations Board, 3 Cir., 1941, 120 F.2d 96, 100 ; Att’y Gen. Man. Ad. Proc. Act 94-95 (1947); Davis, Administrative Law 160-167, 846-848 (1951).

Federal Trade Commission v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation

778 F.2d 35 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 18, 1985

FTC v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 580 F.Supp. 981 (D.D.C.1983). … See, e.g., Friedman v. Rogers, 440 U.S. 1 , 99 S.Ct. 887 , 59 L.Ed.2d 100 (1979). Both consumers and society have a strong interest “in the free flow of commercial information,” see Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v.

Brown v. Chevy Chase Bank

373 F. App'x 79 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 30, 2010

See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004). Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published.

Brown v. Suburban Propane, LP

367 F. App'x 165 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 12, 2010

See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004). That rule requires “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a). … Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 556, n. 3 , 127 S.Ct. 1955 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007) (citation omitted).

Dickson v. National Transportation Safety Board

639 F.3d 539 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 6, 2011

. § 706(2)(A); see Chritton v. NTSB, 888 F.2d 854, 856 (D.C. Cir. 1989). The Board’s “[f]indings of fact . . . , if supported by substantial evidence, are conclusive.” 49 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(3). … In determining whether substantial evidence supports the NTSB’s decision, we must accept “reasonable credibility determinations” made by the ALJ and approved by the Board. Throckmorton v.

La Forest v. Board of Commissioners

92 F.2d 547 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 9, 1937

He appealed to the Commissioners of the District, who referred the appeal back to the Board for formal hearing. There was a hearing, and the Board adhered to its former ruling. … There was also a governor and a board of public works.

Roberts v. National Transportation Safety Board

776 F.3d 918 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 23, 2015

The FAA sought rehearing, which the Board denied in January 2011. See Administrator v. Roberts, NTSB Order No. EA-5568 (2011), 2011 WL 289248, at *3. … Ass’n of Retired Persons v. EEOC, 873 F.2d 402, 406 (D.C. Cir. 1989) (holding that fee- seekers could gain reimbursement pursuant to the EAJA for their pro bono counsel). The Board expressly recognized this point.

Brown v. Chevy Chase Bank

373 F. App'x 79 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 30, 2010

See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004). Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published.

Brown v. Suburban Propane, LP

367 F. App'x 165 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 12, 2010

See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004). That rule requires “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a). … Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 556, n. 3 , 127 S.Ct. 1955 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007) (citation omitted).

Collins v. National Transportation Safety Board

351 F.3d 1246 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 19, 2003

(citing Sumitomo Shoji America, Inc. v. Avagliano, 457 U.S. 176, 184–85 (1982)); Hill v. Norton, 275 F.3d 98, 104 (D.C. … Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Rev.

National Labor Relations Board v. Eanet

179 F.2d 15 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 31, 1949

In National Labor Relations Board v. … Co. v. National Labor Relations Board 7 and similar cases.

Pirlott v. National Labor Relations Board

522 F.3d 423 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 18, 2008

Board to reconsider the issue of the adequacy of the Union’s financial disclosure in light of Penrod v. … There is no doubt that the Board may not ignore its prior decisions, LeMoyne-Owen College v. NLRB, 357 F.3d 55, 60-61 (D.C.

Jochims v. National Labor Relations Board

480 F.3d 1161 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 23, 2007

to the Court’s decision in NLRB v. … In its Supplemental Decision, however, the Board expressly retreated from any discussion of or reliance on NLRB v.