Case law

Brown v. Metropolitan Life Ins.

100 F.2d 98 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 29, 1938

Browne, husband of appellant, died February 29, 1936. At the time of his death, there were in existence four industrial insurance policies on his life, totalling $2,351.56. … We held in Shellman v.

Brown v. Alves

377 F. App'x 18 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 26, 2010

See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004). Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition 'will not be published.

Brown v. Alves

377 F. App'x 18 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 26, 2010

See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004). Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition 'will not be published.

Brown v. Baradel

360 F. App'x 162 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 4, 2010

See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004). That rule requires “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a).

Brown v. Baradel

360 F. App'x 162 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 4, 2010

See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004). That rule requires “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a).

Brown v. McCarthy

368 F. App'x 145 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 18, 2010

See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir. 2004). That rule requires “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief,” Fed.

Brown v. Miller

360 F. App'x 164 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 5, 2010

See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004). That rule requires “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a). … Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 , 556 n. 3, 127 S.Ct. 1955 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007) (citation omitted).

Brown v. Miller

360 F. App'x 164 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 5, 2010

See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004). That rule requires “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a). … Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 , 556 n. 3, 127 S.Ct. 1955 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007) (citation omitted).

Brown v. Obama

352 F. App'x 446 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 28, 2009

See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004). That rule requires “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a). … Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 , 556 n. 3, 127 S.Ct. 1955 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007) (citation omitted).

Brown v. Obama

352 F. App'x 446 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 28, 2009

See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004). That rule requires “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a). … Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 , 556 n. 3, 127 S.Ct. 1955 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007) (citation omitted).

Trump Plaza Associates v. National Labor Relations Board

679 F.3d 822 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 11, 2012

The High Court ultimately held that the two-member Board lacked the authority to act, New Process Steel, L.P. v. NLRB, 130 S. … Co. v. NLRB, 140 F.3d 259, 265 (D.C.

Brown v. Sellers

292 F. 655 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 3, 1923

This case (companion to Brown v. Sellers [No. 3890] -App. D. C. -, 292 Fed. 655 ), is here on writ of error to the juvenile court of the District of Columbia. … The board is also authorized to appoint truant officers who, in co-operation with the inspectors provided for in the Juvenile Court Act, “shall under the direction of the board of education carry out the provisions of this

Ida Brown v. Joseph Yeldell

487 F.2d 1210 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 29, 1973

I.B. v. D.C. Dep’t of Human Resources, D.C.App., 287 A.2d 827, 829-830 (1972). … See Carafas v. LaVallee, 391 U.S. 234 , 88 S.Ct. 1556 , 20 L.Ed.2d 554 (1968). Affirmed.

Brown, Ernest v. Plaut, William M.

131 F.3d 163 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 16, 1997

Indeed, the administrative proceed- ing before the Housing Board entailed so little process that it would almost certainly be accorded no collateral estoppel effect. See Nasem v. Brown, 595 F.2d 801, 806-08 (D.C. … Did Brown Have a Liberty Interest? In Sandin v.

Nicolson v. Brown

135 F.2d 245 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 29, 1943

Brown v. Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Co., 73 Md. 567 , 601 (appendix); Bond v. Murray, 118 Md. 445 , 84 A. 655 ; Mackall v. Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Co., 94 U.S. 308 , 24 L.Ed. 161 ; Boston & Albany R. Co. v. … Schuylkill Navigation Co. v. Commissioners, 11 Pa. 202, 204 ; United States v. Big Horn Land & Cattle Co., 8 Cir., 17 F.2d 357, 365 . Twin Falls Canal Co. v. American Falls Reservoir, Dist.

John I. Brown v. United States

370 F.2d 242 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 10, 1966

Berger v. United States, supra, 295 U.S. at 88 , 55 S.Ct. at 633 ; Viereck v. United States, supra, 318 U.S. at 248 , 63 S.Ct. at 567 . Reversed. 1 . 22 D.C.Code § 505 (Supp. V 1966). 2 . … See United States v. Brown, D.D.C., Crim. No. 80-65, June 25, 1965. 3 . Compare Walker v. United States, 124 U.S.App.D.C. 194 , 363 F.2d 681 (1966); Hood v. United States, 125 U.S.App.D.C. -, 365 F.2d 949 (1966).

Roland W. Brown v. United States

293 F.2d 149 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 25, 1961

Considered as a whole, the record presents no nonfrivolous question for appellate review and the appeal will therefore be dismissed as legally frivolous. 1 See United States v.

United States v. Reginald T. Brown

463 F.2d 949 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 12, 1972

Bailey v. United States, 128 U.S.App.D.C. 354 , 389 F.2d 305 (1967). See also United States v. Gorman, 355 F.2d 151 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 1024 , 86 S. Ct. 1962 , 16 L.Ed.2d 1027 (1966). … United States v. Davis, 147 U.S.App.D.C. 400 , 458 F.2d 819 (March 16, 1972).

William Brown, Jr. v. United States

264 F.2d 363 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 5, 1959

United States v. Gutterman, 2 Cir., 1945, 147 F.2d 540 , 157 A.L.R. 1221 ; Mayes v. United States, 8 Cir., 1949, 177 F.2d 505 ; People v. Ephraim, 1952, 411 Ill. 118 , 103 N.E.2d 363 . … In a practical view of the situation, Brown’s appeal is without substance. Affirmed. . He was not the trial counsel. . There is a passage in Adams v.

Melvin L. Brown v. United States

365 F.2d 976 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 21, 1966

Coleman v. United States, supra. … Rios v. United States, 364 U.S. 253 , 80 S.Ct. 1431 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1688 (1960); Green v.