Case law

Iowa Independent Bankers, an Iowa Nonprofit Corporation v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Northwest Bancorporation, Intervenor

511 F.2d 1288 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 7, 1975

See, e. g., Brown Enterprises, Inc. v. Fulton, Iowa, 192 N.W.2d 773 (1971); State v. Kappos, Iowa, 189 N.W.2d 563 , cert. denied and appeal dismissed, 405 U.S. 982 , 92 S.Ct. 1242 , 31 L.Ed.2d 449 (1971); Becker v. … The most recent Iowa case to consider the issue of the applicability of a general law to a specific situation is State Board of Regents v.

Crowley Government Services, Inc. v. GSA

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 18, 2025

FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 125 (2000) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also NRDC v. Regan, 67 F.4th 397, 404 (D.C. … Board of Trade, 701 F.2d 653, 656 (7th Cir. 1983) (Posner, J.), cited with approval in Camreta v. Greene, 563 U.S. 692, 712 (2011); U.S. v.

Physicians National House Staff Association v. John H. Fanning

642 F.2d 492 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 23, 1981

The task of decision on the facts of each ease is assigned to the National Labor Relations Board and in making that decision the Board exercises its informed discretion. NLRB v. … See also Leedom v. Kyne, 358 U.S. at 184, 197 , 79 S.Ct. 180, 188 , 3 L.Ed.2d 210 (1958) (Brennan, J. dissenting); Cf. Switchmen’s Union v. National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 (1943).

Fort Dearborn Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

827 F.3d 1067 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 17, 2016

After the appointments of two Board Members were invalidated, see NLRB v. Noel Canning, 134 S. … Although the court will defer to the Board’s interpretation of the Act, Stanford Hosp. & Clinics v. NLRB, 325 F.3d 334, 337 (D.C.

Browning-Ferris Indus. of Cal., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

911 F.3d 1195 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 28, 2018

represented Leadpoint before the Board in Browning-Ferris. … Cir. 1945); Radio City, 135 F.2d 715; Norwood Hosp. v. Brown, 122 So. 411 (Ala. 1929); Ayala v. Antelope Valley Newspapers, Inc., 327 P.3d 165 (Cal. 2014); S. A. Gerrard Co. v. Indus.

Story v. Rives

97 F.2d 182 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 4, 1938

An indeterminate sentence is one for the maximum period imposed by the court, subject to termination by the Parole Board at any time after service of the minimum period. In United States ex rel. Paladino v. … (N.S.) 931, 20 Ann.Cas. 1217; Commonwealth v. Brown, 167 Mass. 144 , 45 N.E. 1 ; Commonwealth v. Kalck, 239 Pa. 533 , 87 A. 61 ; Woods v. State, 130 Tenn. 100 , 169 S.W. 558 , L.R.A. 1915F, 531 ; State v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters

826 F.3d 460 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 21, 2016

RESPONDENT v. … We “may consider only the Board’s own reasons, not the rationalizations of counsel.” Charlotte Amphitheater Corp. v. NLRB, 82 F.3d 1074, 1080 (D.C. Cir. 1996) (citing SEC v. Chenery Corp., 318 U.S. 80, 95 (1943)).

Retail Store Employees Union, Local 400 v. National Labor Relations Board

360 F.2d 494 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 13, 1965

The Board's inference should also rest upon some findings. This is underscored by the place accorded to findings of a trial examiner in Universal Camera Corp. v. … See Burlington Truck Lines v. United States, 371 U.S. 156, 167 , 83 S.Ct. 239 , 9 L.Ed.2d 207 , recently cited in Judge Washington's dissenting opinion in Texaco, Inc. v.

Allen v. Brown

320 F. Supp. 3d 16 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 1, 2018

See Allen v. Brown , 185 F.Supp.3d at 6 . … See Allen v. Brown , 185 F.Supp.3d at 6-7 . B.

Enterprise Leasing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

831 F.3d 534 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 5, 2016

We therefore summarily enforce the Board’s findings and order as to those charges. See Allied Mech. Servs., Inc. v. NLRB, 668 F.3d 758, 765 (D.C. Cir. 2012); Flying Food Grp., Inc. v. NLRB, 471 F.3d 178, 181 (D.C. … States Optical Co., 275 NLRB at 372; see also Exxel/Atmos, Inc. v. NLRB, 147 F.3d 972, 975 (D.C. Cir. 1998). But Browne did not stop there. Instead, he directed Garcia “to go back and get more” signatures.

Jacoby v. National Labor Relations Board

233 F.3d 611 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 12, 2000

We have held that the Board's interpretation of the duty of fair representation is entitled to deference under Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. … NRDC, 467 U.S. 837 (1984), when the Board enforces that duty as part of its jurisdiction to identify and remedy unfair labor practices. Ferriso v. NLRB, 125 F.3d 865, 869 (D.C. Cir. 1997); Finerty v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Blake Construction Co., Inc., and Its Alter Ego, M & S Building Supplies, Inc.

663 F.2d 272 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 17, 1981

The Board has wide latitude to exercise its remedial powers under the Act. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. NLRB, 379 U.S. 203, 215-17 , 85 S.Ct. 398, 405-06 , 13 L.Ed.2d 233 (1964); NLRB v. … San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers v. NLRB, 501 F.2d 794 , 802 (D.C.Cir.1974).

Honeywell International, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

253 F.3d 119 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 29, 2001

See Allied Chem. & Alkali Workers v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co., 404 U.S. 157, 159 (1971); UAW v. NLRB, 765 F.2d 175, 1799-80 (D.C. Cir. 1985). … But the federal courts, not the Board, are legislatively empowered to be the primary inter- preters of contracts. See Litton Fin. Printing Div. v.

Hamrick v. Brusseau

80 F. App'x 116 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 28, 2003

Library of Congress, 750 F.2d 89 , 103 n. 31 (D.C.Cir.1984); Laswell v. Brown, 688 F.2d 261, 268 (8th Cir.1982) (quoting Bivens v. … See Mississippi Industries v. F.E.R.C., 808 F.2d 1525 , 1567 (D.C.Cir.1987) (abuse of discretion standard for reviewing recusal decisions). Pursuant to D.C.Cir. Rule 36, this disposition will not be published.

Brown v. Rudolph

25 F.2d 540 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 2, 1928

Brown, and in our judgment said Robert W. … Kendall v. Stokes et al., 3 How. 87, 98 , 11 L. Ed. 506 ; Spalding v. Vilas, 161 *542 U. S. 483 , 16 S. Ct. 631 , 40 L. Ed. 780 ; De Arnaud v. Ainsworth, 24 App. D. C. 167, 5 L. E. A. (N. S.) 163; Mellon v.

Brown v. Shimabukuro

118 F.2d 17 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 27, 1941

Affirmed. 1 Young v. Young, 57 App.D.C. 157 , 18 F.2d 807 . Cf. Sacks v. Steeker, 2 Cir., 60 F.2d 73 . A narrower view is sometimes taken. Union Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Thomas, 9 Cir., 83 F. 803 .

Brown v. Christman

126 F.2d 625 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 9, 1942

In Boss v. … Brown, Tex.Civ.App., 22 S.W.2d 701, 703 ; where a check for the entire amount on deposit was accompanied by an assignment and delivery of the deposit slip, Hove v.

Western Coal Traffic League,petitioners v. Surface Transportation Board and United States of America, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Intervenors

216 F.3d 1168 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 14, 2000

Given the Board’s “special cognizance” over the railroad industry, National Motor Freight Traffic Ass’n v. … Fruit Growers Ass'n v. Martin, 968 F.2d 1265, 1272 (D.C.Cir.1992); see also Forester v. Consumer Prod.

W & M Properties of Connecticut, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

514 F.3d 1341 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 8, 2008

Broido, Senior Attorney.  2 Before: BROWN and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges, and EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GRIFFITH. … Hotel Mgmt., LLC v.

Shima v. Brown

140 F.2d 337 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 27, 1943

Appellee Brown recovered a judgment against appellant Shima in a suit for board and room. … Shima v. Brown, 77 U.S.App.D.C. 115 , 133 F.2d 48 , cert. denied, 318 U.S. 787 . Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co. of New York, 265 U.S. 78 , 44 S.Ct. 481 , 68 L.Ed. 909 ; Blassengame v.