Case law

Go Air, Inc. v. National Transportation Safety Board, Engen (Donald D.)

841 F.2d 428 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 7, 1988

841 F.2d 428 268 U.S.App.D.C. 306 Go Air, Inc. v. National Transportation Safety Board, Engen (Donald D.) NO. 87-1000 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. MAR 07, 1988 1 Appeal From: NAT.

United Electrical Contractors Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board

258 F. App'x 331 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 27, 2007

Agents’ Int’l Union, 361 U.S. 477, 488 , 80 S.Ct. 419 , 4 L.Ed.2d 454 (1960), and this court gives deference to the Board’s determination, which is “largely a matter for the Board’s expertise.” NLRB v. … Scepter, Inc. v.

Heartland Plymouth Court MI, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

650 F. App'x 11 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 3, 2016

Ctr. v. NLRB, 433 F.3d 834, 835 (2005). … Nuclear Operating Co. v. NLRB, 524 F.3d 1350, 1358 (D.C. Cir. *13 2008); NLRB v. U.S. Postal Serv., 8 F.3d 832, 836 (D.C. Cir. 1993).

National Council of American-Soviet Friendship, Inc. v. Subversive Activities Control Board

301 F.2d 518 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 10, 1962

Counsel having appeared before this court for a prehearing conference, and it appearing that counsel for petitioner asserts that numerous alleged findings of fact included in the Report and Order of the Board here under review … are without the support of substantial evidence in the record as a whole; and it further appearing that the Board in response insists that all its findings are fully supported by substantial evidence in the record; and it

Meat & Highway Drivers, Dockmen, Helpers & Miscellaneous Truck Terminal Employees, Local Union No. 710 v. National Labor Relations Board

335 F.2d 709 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 25, 1964

See Labor Board v. Mexia Textile Mills, 339 U. S. 563, 567 , 70 S.Ct. 833 , 94 L.Ed. 1067 (1950), and cases there cited. To the extent that the Board decree is so designed, it will be enforced. V. … Member Brown of the Board, who relied on Retail Clerks Union Local 770 v. N.L.R.B., supra Note 8, dissented from the Board’s decision that the provision here involved violated § 8(e).

American Airlines, Inc., National Airlines, Inc., Intervenor v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Capitol Airways, Inc., Quaker City Airways, Inc., Aircoach Transport Association, and Independent Military Air Transport Association, Intervenors. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, United Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Northwest Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Allegheny Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Capital Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Braniff Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Pacific Northern Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Abilene & Southern Railway Company v. Civil Aeronautics Board

235 F.2d 845 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 19, 1956

TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, Inc., Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent. EASTERN AIR LINES, Inc., Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent. PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS, Inc., Petitioner, v. … CONTINENTAL AIR LINES, Inc., Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent. NORTHWEST AIR LINES, Inc., Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent. ALLEGHENY AIRLINES, Inc., et al., Petitioners, v.

Textile Workers Union of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

420 F.2d 635 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 14, 1969

after the Supreme Court decided NLRB v. … had virtually abandoned the Joy Silk Mills, Inc. v.

Retail Store Employees Union Local 954 v. Rothman

298 F.2d 330 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 11, 1962

Brown, Jr., National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Boad, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. … Natinal Labor Relations Board, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 316 , 201 F.2d 187 (1952), and in Bandlow v.

Inland Lakes Management, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

987 F.2d 799 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 9, 1993

as a § 8(b)(1)(B) violation. 17 The Board responds on appeal 2 that these cases predate the decision of the Supreme Court in NLRB v. … Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wichita Board of Trade, 412 U.S. 800, 808 , 93 S.Ct. 2367, 2375 , 37 L.Ed.2d 350 (1973) (plurality opinion); see also NLRB v.

Broadcasting Board of Governors Office of Cuba Broadcasting v. Federal Labor Relations Authority

752 F.3d 453 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 16, 2014

Before addressing the merits of the Board’s arguments, however, we must determine whether we have subject matter jurisdiction. See Department of the Navy v. FLRA, 665 F.3d 1339, 1344 (D.C. … In support, the Board relies on our recent opinion in Federal Bureau of Prisons v. FLRA, 654 F.3d 91 (D.C.

Aotop, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

331 F.3d 100 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 10, 2003

See Boire v. … See Colquest Energy, Inc. v.

United States Postal Service v. National Labor Relations Board

969 F.2d 1064 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 1992

In ruling on the cross-application, we have authority to consider the responding party's objections to the Board's decision. 4 See Ford Motor Co. v. … We have no warrant on the facts before us to declare the Board's relief order excessive. See Virginia Elec. & Power Co. v.

Banercraft Clothing Company, Inc. v. The Renegotiation Board, Astro Communication Laboratory, a Division of Aiken Industries, Inc. v. The Renegotiation Board, David B. Lilly Co., Inc. v. The Renegotiation Board

466 F.2d 345 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 6, 1972

466 F.2d 345 151 U.S.App.D.C. 174 BANERCRAFT CLOTHING COMPANY, Inc. v. The RENEGOTIATION BOARD, Appellant. ASTRO COMMUNICATION LABORATORY, A Division of Aiken Industries, Inc. v. The RENEGOTIATION BOARD, Appellant. … Renegotiation Board, the District Judge ordered production of the documents for in camera inspection so he could evaluate the force of the Board's arguments. Cf. Soucie v.

Greater Washington Board of Trade v. District of Columbia and Sharon Pratt Dixon

948 F.2d 1317 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 10, 1992

WALD, Circuit Judge: Appellant Greater Washington Board of Trade (“Board”) is a nonprofit corporation that provides health insurance to its employees. … On March 27, 1991, the district court granted appellees’ motion to dismiss and denied the Board’s motion for a preliminary injunction. See Greater Wash. Bd. of Trade v. District of Columbia, No. 91-00511 (D.D.C.

American Association of Marriage and Family Counselors Inc. v. Harold Brown, Secretary of Defense

593 F.2d 1365 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 21, 1979

American Association of Marriage and Family Counselors, Inc. v. Brown, 440 F.Supp. 1114 (D.D.C.1977). This appeal followed. B. … In NTEU v.

International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 470 v. National Labor Relations Board

350 F.3d 105 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 2, 2003

Co., Inc. v. NLRB, 213 F.3d 750, 755 (D.C.Cir.2000) (internal quotation marks omitted). … Plastics, Inc. v. NLRB., 209 F.3d 727, 735 (D.C.Cir.2000) (citing Wright Line, Inc., 251 N.L.R.B. 1083 , 1089, 1980 WL 12312 (1980)). *396 Ross Stores, Inc. v. NLRB, 235 F.3d 669, 675 (D.C.Cir.2001).

International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

426 F.2d 1243 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 3, 1970

There is a presumption that favors the Board, with its expertise, in its selection of remedies. Fibreboard Paper Prods. Corp. v. N.L.R.B., supra. See also Consolo v. … Corp. v. N.L.R.B., supra,; N.L.R.B. v. Mooney Aircraft, Inc., supra. The Union has asked for remand to the Board for further consideration of the make-whole claim (while the remainder of the Board’s order is enforced).

Thomas Carswell v. J.J. Parker, Warden, U.S. Penitentiary and U.S. Parole Board

385 F.2d 645 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 24, 1967

It is conceded that the Board’s warrant was issued and executed promptly after the facts constituting the violation came to the Board’s attention and at a time when the Board had statutory power to act. Birch v. … Citing such cases as Anderson v. Corall, 263 U.S. 193 , 44 S.Ct. 43 , 68 L.Ed. 247 (1923), and Zerbst v.

Earnest Frank Brown, Sr. v. Charles H. Ward, United States Marshal for District of Columbia

275 F.2d 884 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 25, 1960

Maktos v. Matthews, 1952, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 183, 184 , 194 F.2d 354, 355 . There was thus ample basis for the requisition. See Bruzaud v. Matthews, 1953, 93 U.S. App.D.C. 47, 207 F.2d 25 . The situation in Fowler v. … As we said in Richards v. Matthews, 1953, 93 U.S.App.D.C. 70, 73 , 207 F.2d 227 , 230:

William B. Blount v. Securities and Exchange Commission, Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, Intervenor

61 F.3d 938 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 4, 1995

As such, the Board asserts, the rule cannot be found to violate the First or Tenth Amendments, since the Constitution is “a restraint on government action, not that of private persons”, CBS v. … Co. v.