Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.55s
International Organization Of Masters, Mates And Pilots v. National Labor Relations Board
486 F.2d 1271 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 30, 1973
ILA-AFL-CIO, Petitioners v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent Marine & Marketing International Corporation, Intervenor No. 72-1595. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. … Labor Board, 357 U.S. 93, 99-100 , 78 S.Ct. 1011, 1016 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1186 (1958); see National Woodworkers Mfrs. Ass'n. v. NLRB, supra, 386 U.S., at 619 , 87 S.Ct. 1250 6 See NLRB v. Allis Chalmers Mfg.
Cited 13 timesPublishedSecurities Industry Ass'n v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System
821 F.2d 810 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 7, 1987
Ass’n v. Board of Governors of the Fed. … In Board of Governors of the Fed. Reserve Sys. v. Investment Co.
Cited 2 timesPublishedChauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local Union No. 175 v. National Labor Relations Board
294 F.2d 261 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 6, 1961
The Board’s order is apparently intended to prevent the union from inducing employees of any trucking concern to respect the picket line at McJunkin’s plant. … The case will be remanded to the Board with directions to modify its order so that it will not be broader than the one the Hearing Examiner had recommended. As so modified, the order will be enforced. Order modified.
Cited 2 timesPublishedTextile Workers Union of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board
475 F.2d 973 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 1, 1973
It is not clear that an order issued in Stevens V is “adequate”— to use the Board’s word — in Stevens XII. … See International Union of Electrical Workers v. N. L. R. B., 426 F.2d 1243 , 1249 (D.C.Cir.1970); SEC v. Chenery Corp., 318 U.S. 80 , 63 S.Ct. 454 , 87 L.Ed. 626 (1943). . See J. P. Stevens & Co., Inc., v. N. L. R.
Cited 18 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 19, 2023
However, Brown’s allegations regarding the actions of these individuals do not create liability for the District as a defendant. In Monell v. … Triplett v. District of Columbia, 108 F.3d 1450, 1453 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (quoting Jett v. Dallas Indep. Sch. Dist., 491 U.S. 701, 737 (1989)). Brown has not alleged, much less shown, that in the area of mental health Dr.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNational Capital Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Washington Airways, Inc., Intervenor
419 F.2d 668 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 28, 1969
Butler Aviation Company v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 389 F.2d 517 (2d Cir. 1968). … Accardi v. Shaughnessy, 347 U.S. 260 , 74 S.Ct. 499 , 98 L.Ed. 681 (1954) (denial of fair and impartial consideration by Board of Immigration Appeals); Pacific Molasses Co. v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedSoft Drink Workers Union Local 812 v. National Labor Relations Board
937 F.2d 684 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 9, 1991
Penello v. … Building Service Employees Int’l Union, Local 262 v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCommunist Party of the United States of America v. Subversive Activities Control Board
254 F.2d 314 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 11, 1958
Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 95 F.2d 390, 397 (2 Cir., 1938). 10 . … National Labor Relations Board v. Fairchild Engine & Airplane Corp., 145 F.2d 214 (4 Cir., 1944) ; National Labor Relations Board v.
Cited 40 timesPublishedGeorge J. Hurley v. George J. Reed, Chairman, United States Board of Parole
288 F.2d 844 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 2, 1961
The later proceeding, of course, would necessarily be in the District of Columbia where jurisdiction of the Board may be had. Robbins v. Reed, 1959, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 51 , 269 F.2d 242 ; Howell v. … Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 339 U.S. 667, 671 , 70 S.Ct. 876 , 94 L.Ed. 1194 . Reliance is placed by the Parole Board, however, on two decisions of our court. Clark v.
Cited 27 timesPublishedOil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union v. National Labor Relations Board
806 F.2d 269 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 2, 1986
Mahon v. NLRB, No. 85-7565 (9th Cir.1985); Roadway Express, Inc. v. … See, e.g., NLRB v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedAmerican Bakery & Confectionery Workers International Union v. National Labor Relations Board
379 F.2d 160 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 18, 1967
the reports of Board decisions. … Company, in the face of organizing efforts of the Union, violated Sections 8(a) (1), (2), and (3) of the Act are supported by substantial evidence in the record considered as a whole, as required by Universal Camera Corp. v.
Cited 1 timesPublished371 F.2d 733 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 9, 1967
See Outagamie County, Wis., v. CAB, 355 F.2d 900, 906-908 (7th Cir. 1966). The Board’s findings as to the various factors are amply supported by the record. … Compare City of Lawrence, Mass. v. CAB, 343 F.2d 583 (1st Cir. 1965). The court had under consideration the Board’s order in the New England Regional Airport Investigation.
Cited 39 timesPublished335 F.2d 709 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 25, 1964
See Labor Board v. Mexia Textile Mills, 339 U. S. 563, 567 , 70 S.Ct. 833 , 94 L.Ed. 1067 (1950), and cases there cited. To the extent that the Board decree is so designed, it will be enforced. V. … Member Brown of the Board, who relied on Retail Clerks Union Local 770 v. N.L.R.B., supra Note 8, dissented from the Board’s decision that the provision here involved violated § 8(e).
Cited 4 timesPublishedGeiger Ready-Mix Company of Kansas City, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
87 F.3d 1363 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 5, 1996
Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union v. … See NLRB v. Special Mine Servs., Inc., 11 F.3d 88, 90 (7th Cir.1993) (“When the Board defers decision, it ought to defer the application for enforcement as well.”).
Cited 5 timesPublishedHeartland Plymouth Court MI, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board
650 F. App'x 11 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 3, 2016
Ctr. v. NLRB, 433 F.3d 834, 835 (2005). … Nuclear Operating Co. v. NLRB, 524 F.3d 1350, 1358 (D.C. Cir. *13 2008); NLRB v. U.S. Postal Serv., 8 F.3d 832, 836 (D.C. Cir. 1993).
Cited 0 timesPublished438 F.2d 154 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 8, 1970
438 F.2d 154 NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY, Appellant, v. DISTRICT UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD, Lucy Arlene Thomas. NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY, Appellant, v. DISTRICT UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD, Laura H. Dorsey. … Tunget v. State Employment Security Dept., 2 Wash.App. 574 , 468 P.2d 734 (1970); Sciacca v. Unemployment Compensation Bd. of Review, 189 Pa.Super. 334 , 150 A.2d 557 (1959); Szojka v.
Cited 15 timesPublished235 F.2d 845 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 19, 1956
TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, Inc., Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent. EASTERN AIR LINES, Inc., Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent. PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS, Inc., Petitioner, v. … CONTINENTAL AIR LINES, Inc., Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent. NORTHWEST AIR LINES, Inc., Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent. ALLEGHENY AIRLINES, Inc., et al., Petitioners, v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedNational Council of American-Soviet Friendship, Inc. v. Subversive Activities Control Board
301 F.2d 518 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 10, 1962
Counsel having appeared before this court for a prehearing conference, and it appearing that counsel for petitioner asserts that numerous alleged findings of fact included in the Report and Order of the Board here under review … are without the support of substantial evidence in the record as a whole; and it further appearing that the Board in response insists that all its findings are fully supported by substantial evidence in the record; and it
Cited 2 timesPublishedAlexander J. Woykovsky v. Richard A. Chappell, Chairman, U. S. Board of Parole
336 F.2d 927 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 18, 1964
United States Board of Parole, No. 18,301. … See, for example, Jones v. Clemmer, supra; Frierson v. Rogers, 289 F.2d 234 (5th Cir. 1961); Grant v. Hunter, 166 F.2d 673 (10th Cir. 1948); cf. Bates v. Rivers, 116 U.S.App.D.C. 306 , 323 F.2d 311 (1963).
Cited 12 timesPublishedWeldon, Williams & Lick, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
255 F. App'x 535 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 21, 2007
The petition for review and cross-application for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board was considered on the briefs and oral arguments of counsel. … Conair Corp. v. NLRB, 721 F.2d 1355, 1368 (D.C.Cir.1983) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna